imported post
Actually the court even said in their opinion that he had a valid argument in assuming that the lobby was not a prohibited area. Where he went wrong was staying to argue and get belligerent. I think that the court made the wrong decision and I could see this being overturned by the SCOTUS. He should have been found guilty of the first charge regarding the confrontation and not guilty of the second IMHO.
I would like to see the argument that legally carrying for lawful purposes is allowed, however, as another case.