Flintlock
Regular Member
imported post
SmallWhiteBox wrote:
The so-called separation of church and state exists nowhere in the constitution or the declaration of independence. References to God exist in the declaration, on our money, and in the writings of most of the founders, among other places. If it wasn't unconstitutional after 1791, thenit isn't unconstitutional now.
Not one specific "religion" is mentioned or"established"but to discount all religion is to actuallyadovocate and establishthe religion of atheism.
SmallWhiteBox wrote:
Why not? I don't think we can have an objective and equal government of the peopleso long as we are able to vote for president in thegeneral elections. Too many promises that should never be and it advocates corruption beyond comprehension. Probably why the founders had congress vote for president and not the people.Voting for any entity that bases part(s) of itself on any religious teachings, even if they match what you believe, is a very dangerous path. You cannot have an objective and equal government of the people if you do not separate state and religion.
The so-called separation of church and state exists nowhere in the constitution or the declaration of independence. References to God exist in the declaration, on our money, and in the writings of most of the founders, among other places. If it wasn't unconstitutional after 1791, thenit isn't unconstitutional now.
Not one specific "religion" is mentioned or"established"but to discount all religion is to actuallyadovocate and establishthe religion of atheism.