BB62
Accomplished Advocate
imported post
RetLeo99 wrote:
In reading the law, it seems like to be guilty of one or the other, the "alarm" must be real - a standard that is in many cases very subjective.
You have come to this site, presumably because you support the exercise of OC (or maybe because you're a SPY! LOL) - so what do you think about the question above?
RetLeo99 wrote:
You bring up a point much discussed here - that is the threat, or the actual issuance of a ticket (or is it "summons"?) for Inducing Panic or Disorderly Conduct. These possible chargeshave stopped many a potential OCer from doing so - but one must ask "How can I exercise a right without such worry?...This left us with a piddly charge of Inducing Panic. But we couldn't even get that because the brain surgeon store clerk, who was the only one in the store at the time, decided to go macho and testified that he wasn't alarmed at all...
In reading the law, it seems like to be guilty of one or the other, the "alarm" must be real - a standard that is in many cases very subjective.
You have come to this site, presumably because you support the exercise of OC (or maybe because you're a SPY! LOL) - so what do you think about the question above?