Flintlock
Regular Member
imported post
A bit off-topic but bizarre and sad..
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,353998,00.html
A bit off-topic but bizarre and sad..
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,353998,00.html
After White's death, about two dozen homes were evacuated for two days while explosives experts collected pieces from his collection and detonated them.
I once burned smokeless powder that had been at the bottom of the sea for over 70 years after letting it dry, and it lit right up. Even if powder gets wet, it is still dangerous once it's dry. When I was at MCAS Cherry Point, NC, in the early 1990s, we were warned that there was unexploded civil war munitions in the nearby woods.
Tomahawk wrote:
I once burned smokeless powder that had been at the bottom of the sea for over 70 years after letting it dry, and it lit right up. Even if powder gets wet, it is still dangerous once it's dry. When I was at MCAS Cherry Point, NC, in the early 1990s, we were warned that there was unexploded civil war munitions in the nearby woods.
You guys are correct for smokeless powder, but black powder does not survive getting wet very often. Principally this is because smokeless powder is a true chemical compounding, whereas black powder is a simple mechanical mixture. Both the salt peter and the sulphur can be separated out by moisture. But if the black powder is kept in an enclosed space like a cannon ball, the components do not wash away, and when it dries out it might still produce an exciting reaction when you add a little heat.
Better living through chemistry:celebrate
Regards
note to self: do not dremel cannoball
"Biemeck and Peter George, co-author of a book on Civil War ordnance, believe White was using either a drill or a grinder attached to a drill to remove grit from the cannonball, causing a shower of sparks.
Because of the fuse design, it may have appeared as though the weapon's powder had already been removed, leading even a veteran like White to conclude mistakenly that the ball was inert."
Yeah but no one told the fuse that it was.W.E.G. wrote:
note to self: do not dremel cannoball
"Biemeck and Peter George, co-author of a book on Civil War ordnance, believe White was using either a drill or a grinder attached to a drill to remove grit from the cannonball, causing a shower of sparks.
Because of the fuse design, it may have appeared as though the weapon's powder had already been removed, leading even a veteran like White to conclude mistakenly that the ball was inert."
It doesn't make a bit of difference guys, the balls are inert!
... SNIP
It doesn't make a bit of difference guys, the balls are inert!