• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Letters: 'A PROVOCATIVE THOUGHT EXPERIMENT ON GUNS' Philly.com Daily News H/T John R. Lott, Jr.

Doug Huffman

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
9,180
Location
Washington Island, across Death's Door, Wisconsin,
imported post

http://www.philly.com/dailynews/opinion/20080506_Letters__A_PROVOCATIVE_THOUGHT_EXPERIMENT_ON_GUNS.html

ABOUT 90 percent of the people shot in the city last year were African-American. While figures are unavailable, it is assumed by most that close to 100 percent of the perpetrators of these shootings were African-American.

Almost all the firearms used in these shootings were obtained, possessed and carried illegally by those who perpetrated the shootings. If, as is constantly claimed, we MUST DO SOMETHING to stop this violence, then why not ban African-American residents of the city from owning handguns?

The answer is that that is patently unfair and discriminatory. To judge an entire group as a problem and punish all members of that group, irrespective of their individual actions, is unconscionable.

Yet, it's deemed perfectly acceptable to discriminate against one particular group - gun owners.

Let's just tell the truth. The instant Mayor Nutter gets the right to pass gun laws for Philly, it will become a practical impossibility to own a handgun or any other weapon the city deems "inappropriate."

I've done nothing wrong, but my rights are to be removed step-by-step because others - entirely outside the law - are using guns feloniously. How is this any less outrageous a suggestion than that black people shouldn't be allowed to have guns?

J.F. Wolfington, Philadelphia
 

imperialism2024

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
3,047
Location
Catasauqua, Pennsylvania, USA
imported post

Eh, this is gonna come off badly for him as far as public perception...

I think a better comparison would be to ban black people. That would get across the point that the "we must do ANYTHING to stop violent crime" actually doesn't mean "anything", but only "anything" involving legal gun owners. It also points out how ridiculous it is to attribute criminality to an inanimate feature, like skin color or gun ownership. Even within entirely white communities there is a good deal of crime.

At any rate, the laws already on the books do a fair job of discriminating. Legislation against "junk guns" and requiring training to get LTCF's target socioeconomically disadvantaged minority groups, and may-issue carry permits allow anyone with a racist agenda to continue said agenda unchecked. In other words... gun control is this country is already effectively banning law-abiding black people from having guns.
 
Top