• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Schools and School Zones / Oak Harbor...

G

Guest

Guest
imported post

Friend of mine told me that Oak Harbor has/had impose a city ordinance stating that carrying concealed within 500 yds of a school is illegal? Their is a major throughfare that connects two major arteries in this town that passes right in front of a school. How do my rights apply in this case? I would imagine they would freak if they saw me walk down the sidewalk while carrying openly.

Thanks,

Dave
 

joeroket

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
3,339
Location
Everett, Washington, USA
imported post

Dukester wrote:
Friend of mine told me that Oak Harbor has/had impose a city ordinance stating that carrying concealed within 500 yds of a school is illegal? Their is a major throughfare that connects two major arteries in this town that passes right in front of a school. How do my rights apply in this case? I would imagine they would freak if they saw me walk down the sidewalk while carrying openly.

Thanks,

Dave
The city ord., if it does exist is pre-empted and repealed by state law. Now if you do not have a Wa. CPL then they could technically get you on the federal gun free zone laws.

Code:
(A) It shall be unlawful for any individual knowingly to possess a firearm that has moved in or that otherwise affects
interstate or foreign commerce at a place that the individual knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, is a school
zone. 
(B) Subparagraph (A) does not apply to the possession of a firearm— 
(i) on private property not part of school grounds; 
(ii) if the individual possessing the firearm is licensed to do so by the State in which the school zone is located or a
political subdivision of the State, and the law of the State or political subdivision requires that, before an
individual obtains such a license, the law enforcement authorities of the State or political subdivision verify 
hat the individual is qualified under law to receive the license;
 

carhas0

New member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
161
Location
, ,
imported post

I agree with joeroket. With a CPL you should be fine because the local ordinance is repealed by preemption. Without a CPL you would run into federal trouble, which restricts carry in a school zone to CPL holders (but I don't remember the distance of a "school zone" from a school).
 

joeroket

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
3,339
Location
Everett, Washington, USA
imported post

sean-1286 wrote:
I agree with joeroket. With a CPL you should be fine because the local ordinance is repealed by preemption. Without a CPL you would run into federal trouble, which restricts carry in a school zone to CPL holders (but I don't remember the distance of a "school zone" from a school).
Oh I forgot to type that , Sorry. The school zone by federal definition is 1000 feet from the boundary lines of the school.
 
G

Guest

Guest
imported post

I do posses a CPL as I mostly CC.I amnew to this open carrying option. Still scared as hell on trying it out on the local law enforcement community...

Dave

 

carhas0

New member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
161
Location
, ,
imported post

Dukester wrote:
I do posses a CPL as I mostly CC.I amnew to this open carrying option. Still scared as hell on trying it out on the local law enforcement community...

Dave

There are others on the forum up your way. You could try contacting them through the boards and arrange a lunch or something. Or you could make it to the monthly lunch in Everett this coming Sunday.

I was nervous about OCing in Seattle so for my first "real OC" (meaning significant outing) I was with others from the board and it helps a lot.
 

joeroket

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
3,339
Location
Everett, Washington, USA
imported post

Dukester wrote:
I do posses a CPL as I mostly CC.I amnew to this open carrying option. Still scared as hell on trying it out on the local law enforcement community...

Dave

Then you are completely legal in walking in front of the school. Myself, I would walk across the street from it just so they can't say you went across part of the school property.
 

Agent 47

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2007
Messages
570
Location
, Washington, USA
imported post

So just to make sure I got this strait, you can carry within 1000 feet of school grounds as long as you have a CPL. You can carry on school grounds with a CPL as long as you are picking up or droping off a student. And you can never carry a gun inside a school building.
 

joeroket

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
3,339
Location
Everett, Washington, USA
imported post

Agent 47 wrote:
So just to make sure I got this strait, you can carry within 1000 feet of school grounds as long as you have a CPL. You can carry on school grounds with a CPL as long as you are picking up or droping off a student. And you can never carry a gun inside a school building.
That is exactly correct.
 

Bill Starks

State Researcher
Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Messages
4,304
Location
Nortonville, KY, USA
imported post

To quote RCW 9.41.280

Possessing dangerous weapons on school facilities — Penalty — Exceptions.

(3) Subsection (1) of this section does not apply to:

(e) Any person in possession of a pistol who has been issued a license under RCW 9.41.070, or is exempt from the licensing requirement by RCW 9.41.060, while picking up or dropping off a student;

(f) Any nonstudent at least eighteen years of age legally in possession of a firearm or dangerous weapon that is secured within an attended vehicle or concealed from view within a locked unattended vehicle while conducting legitimate business at the school;

(g) Any nonstudent at least eighteen years of age who is in lawful possession of an unloaded firearm, secured in a vehicle while conducting legitimate business at the school;
 

DrewGunner

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Messages
363
Location
Seattle, Washington, USA
imported post

joeroket wrote:
Agent 47 wrote:
So just to make sure I got this strait, you can carry within 1000 feet of school grounds as long as you have a CPL. You can carry on school grounds with a CPL as long as you are picking up or droping off a student. And you can never carry a gun inside a school building.
That is exactly correct.
You have to have a CPL to carry within 1000 ft of the school? How does that work? What if you lived across the street from a school and didn't have a CPL?
 

heresolong

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
1,318
Location
Blaine, WA, ,
imported post

DrewGunner wrote:
joeroket wrote:
Agent 47 wrote:
So just to make sure I got this strait, you can carry within 1000 feet of school grounds as long as you have a CPL. You can carry on school grounds with a CPL as long as you are picking up or droping off a student. And you can never carry a gun inside a school building.
That is exactly correct.
You have to have a CPL to carry within 1000 ft of the school? How does that work? What if you lived across the street from a school and didn't have a CPL?
According to the BS federal law you have to have it unloaded and cased. This would even apply to get to and from your car. That is one of the reasons this law is so ridiculous.
 

DrewGunner

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Messages
363
Location
Seattle, Washington, USA
imported post

heresolong wrote:
DrewGunner wrote:
joeroket wrote:
Agent 47 wrote:
So just to make sure I got this strait, you can carry within 1000 feet of school grounds as long as you have a CPL. You can carry on school grounds with a CPL as long as you are picking up or droping off a student. And you can never carry a gun inside a school building.
That is exactly correct.
You have to have a CPL to carry within 1000 ft of the school? How does that work? What if you lived across the street from a school and didn't have a CPL?
According to the BS federal law you have to have it unloaded and cased. This would even apply to get to and from your car. That is one of the reasons this law is so ridiculous.
Thats very good to know. I've been looking at rental houses, one of them is across the street from a school.
 

sv_libertarian

State Researcher
Joined
Aug 15, 2007
Messages
3,201
Location
Olympia, WA, ,
imported post

Dukester wrote:
I do posses a CPL as I mostly CC.I amnew to this open carrying option. Still scared as hell on trying it out on the local law enforcement community...

Dave

I grew up in Oak Harbor, and really have no opinion on what the locals would do over OC. If I get up that way again anytime soon mebbe we can meet up for lunch someplace. That Chinese buffet still on Midway?
 

CC27

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2007
Messages
136
Location
, Washington, USA
imported post

joeroket wrote:
Agent 47 wrote:
So just to make sure I got this strait, you can carry within 1000 feet of school grounds as long as you have a CPL. You can carry on school grounds with a CPL as long as you are picking up or droping off a student. And you can never carry a gun inside a school building.
That is exactly correct.
do you have to CC?
 

Stealth Potato

Regular Member
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
143
Location
Seattle, Washington, USA
imported post

joeroket wrote:
(A) It shall be unlawful for any individual knowingly to possess a firearm that has moved in or that otherwise affects
interstate or foreign commerce at a place that the individual knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, is a school
zone.
This is just another example of the ridiculous lengths to which the commerce clause is stretched to grant the federal legislature damn near arbitrary regulatory power. Simply because a firearm has "moved in" or "affects" interstate commerce, the feds have the authority to dictate what may be done with it forever after? It's such a transparent abuse of the government's constitutional authority that I'm amazed it's allowed to stand.

:banghead:
 

althor

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
61
Location
West Jordan, Utah, USA
imported post

heresolong wrote:
DrewGunner wrote:
joeroket wrote:
Agent 47 wrote:
So just to make sure I got this strait, you can carry within 1000 feet of school grounds as long as you have a CPL. You can carry on school grounds with a CPL as long as you are picking up or droping off a student. And you can never carry a gun inside a school building.
That is exactly correct.
You have to have a CPL to carry within 1000 ft of the school? How does that work? What if you lived across the street from a school and didn't have a CPL?
According to the BS federal law you have to have it unloaded and cased. This would even apply to get to and from your car. That is one of the reasons this law is so ridiculous.
Well the first exemption to the law is for private property that is not part of school grounds. You're just fine if you live within 1000ft. And you don't have to worry about carrying your gun to your car unless you park on the street off your property.

At least that is how I read it.
 

heresolong

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
1,318
Location
Blaine, WA, ,
imported post

Stealth Potato wrote:
joeroket wrote:
(A) It shall be unlawful for any individual knowingly to possess a firearm that has moved in or that otherwise affects
interstate or foreign commerce at a place that the individual knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, is a school
zone.
This is just another example of the ridiculous lengths to which the commerce clause is stretched to grant the federal legislature damn near arbitrary regulatory power. Simply because a firearm has "moved in" or "affects" interstate commerce, the feds have the authority to dictate what may be done with it forever after? It's such a transparent abuse of the government's constitutional authority that I'm amazed it's allowed to stand.

:banghead:
Don't know if it has been mentioned on this forum before, but the courts ruled that the commerce clause extended to a farmer who grew crops "only for his own use" on the grounds that otherwise he would have been purchasing those crops from other farmers from out of state. Therefore they could regulate him because he was affecting interstate commerce. The restriction on the federal government based on interstate commerce is as dead as George Custer (unless there is ever a reversal in the SCOTUS).
 
Top