• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Obama's Anti-Gun Record

John Pierce

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 5, 2006
Messages
1,777
imported post

[flash=320,256]http://www.youtube.com/v/ifEg1aq6Emo&hl=en[/flash]
 

utbagpiper

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
4,061
Location
Utah
imported post

Pretty rough election for gun owners. Comes down to bad, worse, and terrible. I have the advantage of living in a GOP safe State so my vote won't matter anyway.

But if my vote did matter I might have to hold my nose and go for McCain hoping against hope that we might get better SCOTUS appointments out of him than from either of the Democrats.

There is another part of me that wouldn't mind seeing one of the Demos win and get to take some blame for what I figure is going to be a rough 4 years economically anyway. But that is a bit OT for this forumn.

Charles
 

deepdiver

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
5,820
Location
Southeast, Missouri, USA
imported post

utbagpiper wrote:
Pretty rough election for gun owners. Comes down to bad, worse, and terrible. I have the advantage of living in a GOP safe State so my vote won't matter anyway.

But if my vote did matter I might have to hold my nose and go for McCain hoping against hope that we might get better SCOTUS appointments out of him than from either of the Democrats.

There is another part of me that wouldn't mind seeing one of the Demos win and get to take some blame for what I figure is going to be a rough 4 years economically anyway. But that is a bit OT for this forumn.

Charles
Except for the living in a GOP safe state I agree.
 

imperialism2024

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
3,047
Location
Catasauqua, Pennsylvania, USA
imported post

Is it too early to merge together the relevant threads into one big, honkin' thread about members' theories on the 2008 presidential election? It just seems like a lot of redundant comments about strategic voting for gun owners' rights, are being made on a variety of different threads, and it might be more useful and concise to put it all into one...

Or not? :uhoh:
 

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
imported post

imperialism2024 wrote:
Is it too early to merge together the relevant threads into one big, honkin' thread about members' theories on the 2008 presidential election? It just seems like a lot of redundant comments about strategic voting for gun owners' rights, are being made on a variety of different threads, and it might be more useful and concise to put it all into one...

+12

Or maybe a couple threads. One for facts about the candidates and another for strategic discussion.
 

imperialism2024

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
3,047
Location
Catasauqua, Pennsylvania, USA
imported post

Citizen wrote:
imperialism2024 wrote:
Is it too early to merge together the relevant threads into one big, honkin' thread about members' theories on the 2008 presidential election? It just seems like a lot of redundant comments about strategic voting for gun owners' rights, are being made on a variety of different threads, and it might be more useful and concise to put it all into one...

+12

Or maybe a couple threads. One for facts about the candidates and another for strategic discussion.
And sticky them, too, so we don't end up with 20 threads about how anti-gun Obama is every time the main thread(s) drop below the first third of the first page...
 

Pointman

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2008
Messages
1,422
Location
, ,
imported post

Source: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08142/883560-100.stm

Gun-control group secures $350,000 grant
Wednesday, May 21, 2008, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Pennsylvania)

The state's largest gun control group, CeaseFirePA, is getting a $350,000 grant to strengthen its advocacy efforts statewide.

The Chicago-based Joyce Foundation is granting the organization the money over two years to aid its bid to build a statewide, grass-roots response to gun violence, CeaseFirePA's executive director Joe Grace said.

Although the six-year-old nonprofit group, which focuses on stopping gun violence and access to illegal handguns, is based in Philadelphia, it is making its grant announcement today at Pittsburgh police headquarters to underscore its efforts to work with legislators, police and residents around Pennsylvania.

CeaseFirePA supports laws, such as one defeated by the state House on April 1, requiring gun owners to report to police within 72 hours if their handguns are lost or stolen.

-------

From 1998 to 2001, Obama was a director of the Joyce Foundation, the largest provider of tax-free funds to anti-gun groups and causes in this country--$19 million, including the Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence and $1.5 million to the ultra-radical Violence Policy Center and during Joyce’s Obama years. The Joyce Foundation is tightly linked to the Soros Open Society Institute--an extremist group that advocates a worldwide ban on civilian firearm ownership." Obama even considered becoming Joyce’s president, according to the Boston Globe.

Sources:
Illinois State Rifle Association, "ISRA Blasts Candidate Obama On His Record Of Hostility Toward Law-Abiding Firearm Owners," Press Release, 8/24/04
http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/view_topic.php?id=10141&forum_id=4&highlight=Joyce+Foundation
http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/view_topic.php?id=10725&forum_id=65&highlight=Joyce+Foundation
 

John

Regular Member
Joined
May 15, 2008
Messages
62
Location
, ,
imported post

The one good thing about a McCain presidency that might save us is the fact that he might spend a lot of time arguing with democrats over security and the war. That might cut back on the time these liberal pricks have to enact gun control legislation. With Obama in the White House, it is open season on law-abiding Americans.
 

.40 Cal

State Researcher
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
1,379
Location
COTEP FOREVER!, North Carolina, USA
imported post

I say vote for Obama. After 1 year of a failed presidency he will be impeached or better... The American Sheeple will never put up with a socialist President for long. We got rid of Jimmy, L.H. Oswald took care of the other one.
 

imperialism2024

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
3,047
Location
Catasauqua, Pennsylvania, USA
imported post

.40 Cal wrote:
I say vote for Obama. After 1 year of a failed presidency he will be impeached or better... The American Sheeple will never put up with a socialist President for long. We got rid of Jimmy, L.H. Oswald took care of the other one.
I'm not as optimistic.

Sh**ple still want free stuff, and always will. They will gladly take limitations on freedom because they're afraid of freedom. They want Big Brother to take care of them. If it's not socialism on the Democrat side, it's fundamentalist religion on the Republican side that comforts the sh**ple. In other words, the vast majority of the American (and I use that term loosely) people (and I use that term loosely as well) are going to do nothing to stop the gravy train.
 

like_the_roman

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2008
Messages
293
Location
Tucson, Arizona, USA
imported post

imperialism2024 wrote:
Sh**ple still want free stuff, and always will. They will gladly take limitations on freedom because they're afraid of freedom. They want Big Brother to take care of them. If it's not socialism on the Democrat side, it's fundamentalist religion on the Republican side that comforts the sh**ple. In other words, the vast majority of the American (and I use that term loosely) people (and I use that term loosely as well) are going to do nothing to stop the gravy train.

Worse is better, at least in this case. When the gravy train stops (and believe me, it will), people will find out what Obama really is and what he really believes, and the sooner we can be rid of him.
 

imperialism2024

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
3,047
Location
Catasauqua, Pennsylvania, USA
imported post

like_the_roman wrote:
imperialism2024 wrote:
Sh**ple still want free stuff, and always will. They will gladly take limitations on freedom because they're afraid of freedom. They want Big Brother to take care of them. If it's not socialism on the Democrat side, it's fundamentalist religion on the Republican side that comforts the sh**ple. In other words, the vast majority of the American (and I use that term loosely) people (and I use that term loosely as well) are going to do nothing to stop the gravy train.

Worse is better, at least in this case. When the gravy train stops (and believe me, it will), people will find out what Obama really is and what he really believes, and the sooner we can be rid of him.
Well, the gravy train will stop, especially with a worthless currency and ridiculous foreign debt, but things will get much worse when someone else proposes a new gravy train. See Germany before World War II.
 

FogRider

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
1,412
Location
Centennial, Colorado, USA
imported post

.40 Cal wrote:
I say vote for Obama. After 1 year of a failed presidency he will be impeached or better... The American Sheeple will never put up with a socialist President for long. We got rid of Jimmy, L.H. Oswald took care of the other one.
How sure of that are you? After all, Bush has been in office for over seven years.
 

like_the_roman

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2008
Messages
293
Location
Tucson, Arizona, USA
imported post

FogRider wrote:
How sure of that are you? After all, Bush has been in office for over seven years.

Barack Obama is almost the exact opposite of George W. Bush in terms of physical appearance and ideological/cultural background. People are willing to put up with a rotten President as long as he's a WASP Republican from Texas, but they will not be able to put up with Barack Obama.
 

FogRider

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
1,412
Location
Centennial, Colorado, USA
imported post

like_the_roman wrote:
Barack Obama is almost the exact opposite of George W. Bush in terms of physical appearance and ideological/cultural background. People are willing to put up with a rotten President as long as he's a WASP Republican from Texas, but they will not be able to put up with Barack Obama.
You may be on to something there. I can't say I agree with it, but the idea seems sound.
 
Top