UTOC-45-44 wrote:
A couple of thoughts. I will dispute the opening titles about the pentagon being so guarded. It isn't really, for what it is. No fencing at all. As for CCTVs, many do not run anywhere close to 60 frames a second and until I know the frame rate of the system, it is easy enough to ask how far a 747 moved between frames.
Beyond that, we have the calls from the passengers on board the plane giving location information. If the plane did NOT hit the building, where did it go? And if you have the power to somehow engineer THAT, why NOT just engineer crashing it into the building?
We've got how much footage of TWO planes hitting the twin towers. How much of their aluminum bodies or even engines survived the resulting fires? How much of flight 94 survived crashing into the ground?
There may well be some undisclosed details. How and why Building 7 came down, or whether high rises in major cities have to have secret self destruct explosives built in to prevent domino effects is something I might entertain.
But anyone who tries to tell me that a 747 did not hit the pentagon, better start by offering some explanation for where it went instead. Otherwise, Occam's razor is a tough hurdle to overcome on THAT front.
