• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Define "Open" for restaurant carry

treadresistant

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2008
Messages
17
Location
Arlington, ,
imported post

When I'm carrying in a restaurant, must I use my blackhawk serpa style holster which exposes the entire gun, or am I ok tucking my shirt in while wearing an IWB style holster, thus exposing the grip, hammer, and well basically the back portion of the gun?
Thanks
 

stryth

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
68
Location
, ,
imported post

The relevant code section is VA 18.2-308: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+18.2-308


Which starts, in part: "A. If any person carries about his person, hidden from common observation, (i) any pistol, revolver, or other weapon designed or intended to propel a missile of any kind by action of an explosion of any combustible material... For the purpose of this section, a weapon shall be deemed to be hidden from common observation when it is observable but is of such deceptive appearance as to disguise the weapon's true nature."
 

deepdiver

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
5,820
Location
Southeast, Missouri, USA
imported post

treadresistant wrote:
When I'm carrying in a restaurant, must I use my blackhawk serpa style holster which exposes the entire gun, or am I ok tucking my shirt in while wearing an IWB style holster, thus exposing the grip, hammer, and well basically the back portion of the gun?
Thanks
I believe that method of OC is actually referred to as "Virginia carry" because so many people there with the OC only in ABC restaurants end up carrying that way.
 

hsmith

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2007
Messages
1,687
Location
Virginia USA, ,
imported post

deepdiver wrote:
treadresistant wrote:
When I'm carrying in a restaurant, must I use my blackhawk serpa style holster which exposes the entire gun, or am I ok tucking my shirt in while wearing an IWB style holster, thus exposing the grip, hammer, and well basically the back portion of the gun?
Thanks
I believe that method of OC is actually referred to as "Virginia carry" because so many people there with the OC only in ABC restaurants end up carrying that way.
Thats how I do it. If you can't tell it is a handgun when all that is covered is what is in the holster, than you aren't going to be able to figure it out anway!
 

asforme

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Mar 27, 2008
Messages
839
Location
Kalamazoo, MI
imported post

On a related note I have a friend who recently bought a 9mm Markov that came with a leather cavalry style holster with a flap. Looks like this:

DD1465-holster.jpg

Do you think that would be considered illegally CCing?
 

deepdiver

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
5,820
Location
Southeast, Missouri, USA
imported post

That'll be a nice holster for someone to inherit when he gets drilled while trying to get it open and draw his weapon. :shock:

Just kidding. There are obviously situations such as riding or hiking where such a holster is not only warranted but a good idea which is why they designed them in the first place.
 

Nelson_Muntz

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
697
Location
Manassas, Virginia, USA
imported post

I met someone today for the first time, formally. One thing I noticed about him was that he had a two shot derringer mounted on his buckle. I did remark about it, but didn't ask if it was loaded. Anyway, he had the opinion that it was concealed because it 'hid it's true nature'. I guess it was obvious to me because I knew what I was looking at, but who here thinks it was concealed, or not, by definition? LEO?
 

casullshooter

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
490
Location
Bristow, Virginia, USA
imported post

I OCd to a VCDL meet with a Nagant Revolver in a similar flap holster. I was not worried about the need for a quick draw as 98% of the other people in the room were armed family(VCDL Family).:cool:
 

longwatch

Founder's Club Member - Moderator
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
4,327
Location
Virginia, USA
imported post

I agree with the buckle owners opinion because I am the buckle owner.:D
Look at 18.2-308 A. last line.
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+18.2-308
For the purpose of this section, a weapon shall be deemed to be hidden from common observation when it is observable but is of such deceptive appearance as to disguise the weapon's true nature.

Now anyone familiar with NAA Minis may recognize it for what it is, but many folks may not and just think it is a gun shaped buckle. I'm just being conservative about its status to whether its OC or CC. YMMV
 

Attachments

  • cc22_bbg.jpg
    cc22_bbg.jpg
    23.5 KB · Views: 140
Top