jershell99
New member
imported post
Venator wrote:
Should we pursue getting these signs removed as they are a violation of state law?
Venator wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. The only reason I ask is that I regularly frequent Metro Beach and there is a large "NO FIREARMS" sign right by the gate.jershell99 wrote:Since preemption exists and a park is not a firearm free zone, then Open carry is allowed. Concealed carry is allowed with a CPL. Is that better? I tend to take short cuts on forums. Sorry. I shouldn't have to specify on the open carry part since a CPL holder can CC or OC at their discretion.Venator wrote:There is a AG opinion on metro parks. Since they are public property then OC or CC with a CPL is allowed. Preemtion applies.
So is that: OC is allowed and CC with CPL is allowed, or OC and CC with a permit is allowed? Just wanting to clear up the semantics of your sentence structure. As written, it implies that they are both allowed with CPL only. I am not being critical, just want to make it as clear as possible. Thanks.
Should we pursue getting these signs removed as they are a violation of state law?