• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

'TSA's new policelike badges a sore point with real cops.' USA Today today

Doug Huffman

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
9,180
Location
Washington Island, across Death's Door, Wisconsin,
imported post

http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2008-06-15-tsa-badges_N.htm

WASHINGTON — Screeners at the nation's airport checkpoints are going to start wearing police-style badges — but real officers aren't too happy about it. Some sworn officers fear airline passengers will mistake screeners for law-enforcement officials with arrest powers.

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is starting to equip its 48,000 screeners with 3-inch-by-2-inch, silver-colored, copper and zinc badges that will be worn on new royal-blue police-style shirts.

The attire aims to convey an image of authority to passengers, who have harassed, pushed and in a few instances punched screeners. "Some of our officers aren't respected," TSA spokeswoman Ellen Howe said.

Actual airport police, who carry guns and have arrest powers, worry that their own authority will be undercut by screeners who look like police. Every major airport has its own police department or is patrolled by local police.

"A lot of cops at airports are not real thrilled about it," said Duane McGray of the Airport Law Enforcement Agencies Network, an airport police association. "It's another way of saying (to airport police), 'You're not important.' "

Network president Paul Mason, chief of the Lambert-St. Louis International Airport police, worries that passengers will mistake badge-wearing screeners for police and expect them to handle crimes. "There are going to be some growing pains on the part of the (screeners) and police," he said.

Agencies often give badges to workers who aren't law-enforcement officers. At the TSA, badges are carried by 1,200 inspectors who check that airlines, airports and others comply with security rules. The Environmental Protection Agency gives badges to its 250 workers charged with overseeing cleanups of oil spills and other hazardous releases, EPA spokeswoman Roxanne Smith said.

Airport screeners will get badges after finishing a two-day training program covering issues related to badges as well as how to talk to passengers in a calming manner. Unlike police, who often are required to carry their badges while off-duty, screeners will be barred from wearing them when they are not working, TSA Deputy Administrator Gale Rossides said.

"We coupled the badges with the communications training to make it clear to our officers that they're there to facilitate our passengers," Rossides said. She said the TSA has no interest in giving screeners law-enforcement power.

In April, Baltimore-Washington International Airport screeners became the first to get badges and blue shirts, which replace white shirts adorned with a yellow TSA patch. Screeners at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport will get them today.

A.J. Castilla, a screener at Boston's Logan Airport and a spokesman for a screeners union, is eager to get a badge. "It'll go a long way to enhance the respect of this workforce," he said.
 

Eagleeye

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2008
Messages
282
Location
Eagle, Idaho, USA
imported post

Doug Huffman wrote:
I met a Texan CWP with a CWP badge this past weekend - and saw no OC.
What is the point in having a CWP if youre going to be stupid enought to wear a moronic CWP Badge?

Reminds me of thos Mall Rent-A-Cops who like to use thier sercurity company uniform badge as a clothing acessory.:banghead:
 

Sheriff

Regular Member
Joined
May 19, 2008
Messages
1,968
Location
Virginia, USA
imported post

Doug Huffman wrote:
Screeners at the nation's airport checkpoints are going to start wearing police-style badges — but real officers aren't too happy about it. Some sworn officers fear airline passengers will mistake screeners for law-enforcement officials with arrest powers.
242913.jpg
 

Brigdh

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
147
Location
, ,
imported post

Doug Huffman wrote:
http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2008-06-15-tsa-badges_N.htm



The attire aims to convey an image of authority to passengers, who have harassed, pushed and in a few instances punched screeners. "Some of our officers aren't respected," TSA spokeswoman Ellen Howe said.

Gee really? Last time i flew, i didn't feel like i was respected. perhaps they screeners just got on the wrong person's nerves
 

hsmith

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2007
Messages
1,687
Location
Virginia USA, ,
imported post

maybe that money spent on stupid badges and training on how to wear badges could have been spent on actual training so they could actually find threats

But that would poke a hole on the facade of safety the government has created with the TSA
 

goldfishcb

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2008
Messages
10
Location
Phoenix, Arizona, USA
imported post

We couldn't do our jobs without LEO support. TSO's (Transportation Security Officers) are indeed law enforcement. We are 1801 Series Federal Officers (Same as FBI, Border patrol, ICE, and CPB Agents.)

Fact is, we are Federal Officers without powers of arrest. Thats what cops are for.
 

Nelson_Muntz

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
697
Location
Manassas, Virginia, USA
imported post

They ought to make them work shoeless, with only 3oz bottles of water to drink. Make it equally entertaining for the passengers. TSA thugs should be on those digital strip search monitors for the passengers waiting in line to laugh at. How's that for equal Doug?
 

deepdiver

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
5,820
Location
Southeast, Missouri, USA
imported post

""Some of our officers aren't respected," TSA spokeswoman Ellen Howe said."

Oh waaaahhhh. There are millions of US citizens who have had to pass through TSA who haven't been respected. I think their "aren't respected" is a matter of you reap what you sow.
 

goldfishcb

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2008
Messages
10
Location
Phoenix, Arizona, USA
imported post

Yep.. People actually forget why the TSA is in place. Remember 9/11? Obviously not. Look upAATSA (Aviation Transportation Security Act)Usually it's ignorant people who have one thing on their mind. Just themselves. People begin to think that we aren't on the same side. If there was NO security, would you still fly? I doubt it.


The "digital strip search" you speak of isn't so great. Liberal morons complain that its too "intrusive" hence the reason why filters have been added to it. It still does a great job, but trust me.. we dont want to see whats under your clothes unless its a weapon.

EVERY TSA employee (other than a select few)that has to work on the Sterile Side of a checkpoint has to go through screening just as you do! This includes taking everything off their person, wallet, cellphone, watches, jewlery, keys, and yes folks.. shoes too in many cases. I do it everyday.


If you don't like thesecurity screening checkpoints, go Greyhound.It's that simple.
 

Sheriff

Regular Member
Joined
May 19, 2008
Messages
1,968
Location
Virginia, USA
imported post

goldfishcb wrote:
If there was NO security, would you still fly? I doubt it...... If you don't like thesecurity screening checkpoints, go Greyhound.It's that simple.

Yes, I would still fly. And I would open carry if permitted. We've seen what pilots carrying firearms has accomplished recently, blowing a hole in the side of a plane.

And it's not as simple as hopping on a Greyhound. I don't have time to ride to and from a meeting in Los Angeles.
 

jaredbelch

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
545
Location
Cottonwood Heights, Utah, USA
imported post

goldfishcb wrote:
Yep.. People actually forget why the TSA is in place. Remember 9/11? Obviously not. Look upAATSA (Aviation Transportation Security Act)Usually it's ignorant people who have one thing on their mind. Just themselves. People begin to think that we aren't on the same side. If there was NO security, would you still fly? I doubt it.


The "digital strip search" you speak of isn't so great. Liberal morons complain that its too "intrusive" hence the reason why filters have been added to it. It still does a great job, but trust me.. we dont want to see whats under your clothes unless its a weapon.

EVERY TSA employee (other than a select few)that has to work on the Sterile Side of a checkpoint has to go through screening just as you do! This includes taking everything off their person, wallet, cellphone, watches, jewlery, keys, and yes folks.. shoes too in many cases. I do it everyday.


If you don't like thesecurity screening checkpoints, go Greyhound.It's that simple.
And that, Ladies and Gentleman, is the problem...

Airline/Airport employees also don't have to pass through security, unless they are flying, but they are given full access to all parts of the airport including the airplanes...hmmm
 

ScottyT

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
800
Location
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
imported post

goldfishcb wrote:
If there was NO security, would you still fly? I doubt it......

I would feel much safer knowing that law-abiding citizens (like me) were allowed to carry.

The law-abiding people will obey all the moronic restrictions forced upon us, but the criminals will always be hunting for ways to prey upon unarmed victims provided to them by the government.

"...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

It doesn't say "shall not be infringed except where the government decides to infringe upon that right."
 

Sheriff

Regular Member
Joined
May 19, 2008
Messages
1,968
Location
Virginia, USA
imported post

ScottyT wrote:
"...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

It doesn't say "shall not be infringed except where the government decides to infringe upon that right."
The largest street gang in America, The Men In Blue, have been known to disagree with you. :)
 

goldfishcb

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2008
Messages
10
Location
Phoenix, Arizona, USA
imported post

jaredbelch wrote:
goldfishcb wrote:
Yep.. People actually forget why the TSA is in place. Remember 9/11? Obviously not. Look upAATSA (Aviation Transportation Security Act)Usually it's ignorant people who have one thing on their mind. Just themselves. People begin to think that we aren't on the same side. If there was NO security, would you still fly? I doubt it.


The "digital strip search" you speak of isn't so great. Liberal morons complain that its too "intrusive" hence the reason why filters have been added to it. It still does a great job, but trust me.. we dont want to see whats under your clothes unless its a weapon.

EVERY TSA employee (other than a select few)that has to work on the Sterile Side of a checkpoint has to go through screening just as you do! This includes taking everything off their person, wallet, cellphone, watches, jewlery, keys, and yes folks.. shoes too in many cases. I do it everyday.


If you don't like thesecurity screening checkpoints, go Greyhound.It's that simple.
And that, Ladies and Gentleman, is the problem...

Airline/Airport employees also don't have to pass through security, unless they are flying, but they are given full access to all parts of the airport including the airplanes...hmmm

The select few are as follows:


Federal Air Marshalls, FFDO (Federal Flight Deck Officers), Phoenix Police Dept., Federal Officers with orders to fly armed, Military flying while armed, TSA Supervisory Trasportation Security Officers, TSA Lead Trandportation Security Officers, BDO's, and TSA Officials ranking higher than Lead.

This is because they have to go down the EXIT LANE because they are armed or it's a TSA employee. Which in that case, being our checkpoint we can so as we wish.

Everyone else at SKY HARBOR MUST be screened before passing through to ANY sterile area in the airport. PERIOD.

You have no idea what you are talking about.


Also.. We don't have the time or the man power to make sure the people who want to fly armed are actually law abiding citizens. It's not nessicary. Thats why we allow only people with a REAL PURPOSE to fly armed. It's simple. If you want to fly armed.. become a pilot and take the FFDO class, become an air marshal, or anything that I listed above.. otherwise suck it up and like it.
 

BobCav

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
2,798
Location
No longer in Alexandria, Egypt
imported post

goldfishcb wrote:
Yep.. People actually forget why the TSA is in place. Remember 9/11? Obviously not. Look upAATSA (Aviation Transportation Security Act)Usually it's ignorant people who have one thing on their mind. Just themselves. People begin to think that we aren't on the same side. If there was NO security, would you still fly? I doubt it.


The "digital strip search" you speak of isn't so great. Liberal morons complain that its too "intrusive" hence the reason why filters have been added to it. It still does a great job, but trust me.. we dont want to see whats under your clothes unless its a weapon.

EVERY TSA employee (other than a select few)that has to work on the Sterile Side of a checkpoint has to go through screening just as you do! This includes taking everything off their person, wallet, cellphone, watches, jewlery, keys, and yes folks.. shoes too in many cases. I do it everyday.


If you don't like thesecurity screening checkpoints, go Greyhound.It's that simple.

I could argue that mandating that everyone wear helmets 24/7 is a valuable safety tool and "if it saves just one life..." What a bunch of crap.

You may very well be a decent guy, but there are organizations in America that freedom loving Americans that have actually read (and Love) the Constitution and many who have sworn an oath to defend it against all enemies, foreign AND domestic, cannot stomach. The TSA is very high on that list. They are usurping American freedoms and liberties one at a time. Greyhound? Your organization is trying to control busses too now, I hear.

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmond Burke


Here comes the DHS/TSA, disarming and disabling all the good men in America and allowing only themselves to be the defenders of liberty! A job for which they are completely and wholly unsuited and incapable. Talk about a "Hero Complex" on a governmental scale!

I sir, will not be lectured about 9-11. I was on base in DC and lost some friends in the Pentagon. I had to organize the lists of the Navy's dead and I can still see their names on the wall. The creation of Homeland Defense and the TSA were knee-jerk reactions to a problem that could have been best solved other ways, but those don't increase the size of government or creats unnecessary jobs now, do they? It's not about safety or security, it's all about $$$$.

The very creation of these departments are the biggest victory of the terrorists. Every time I step foot in an airport, I AM reminded of 9-11 and the friends I've lost both that dayand in the war, and I realize that we have already lost as a nation. Our lives, our culture, our freedoms HAVE been limited or taken away "in the name of safety". You play into their hands every day you wear that uniform. We may have killed tens of thousands of them, but they have taken freedom and liberty from MILLIONS of Americans and they're laughing at us. They are laughing at you, doing their work for them.

This is typical SOCIALIST behavior. "You must DISARM like good loyal subjects (and dewater, and de-pocket knife and de-nailclipper, etc...) in the name of safety but ze state vill protect you!!

Can anyonecite every known assault and/or death, ANYWHERE, not just on a plane, by 1) nailclippers; 2) keychain size pocket knives; 3) liquids 4) anything else prohibted by the TSA. I'd like to see the actual reported numbers. It's just not worth the cost using standard ORM.

I will not give up one bit of my birthright American freedom in the name of what the TSAcalls "safety" because I do NOT trust you or the TSA with my life or with the lives of my family. If the courts have already determined that even the Police aren't responsible for my personal safety, how in the world is the TSA going to jump in like supermen (dum-da dum!) and do just that with even less actual authority? Remember, can't have authority without responsibility! We love looking up US Codes and laws (it's what we do...).

Organizations such as the TSA, BATFE, FEMA, etc. are insults to American liberty. This is not the America that I served 20 years to protect and preserve and it is a disgrace to my service and to theloyal service of everyone in uniform that has ever served in the military.

"Those who fail to learn the lessons of history....are doomed torepeat it's mistakes."
-George Santayana
 
Top