imperialism2024
Regular Member
imported post
USAF_MetalChris wrote:
Anyhow, it's a terrible thing to have happened. I'd like to think that people didn't stop solely because they were disarmed... If I see a man violently beating a child on the side of the road, my first thought would be that he is deranged and a threat to my safety if I stop. Fortunately, even though Pennsylvania keeps me disarmed of a handgun, I would have the option of stopping, grabbing my trunk gun of choice, and stopping the threat at that point. But I could understand how the sh**ple could assume that if he were engaging in this kind of horrendous behavior, he most likely was carrying a weapon as well.
Or they were just typical sh**ple who were too wrapped up in their cell phone call to bother observing their surroundings.
USAF_MetalChris wrote:
I'm half surprised that the headline wasn't "Police Shoot Unarmed Man"I wonder what would've happened if one of us had shot an unarmed man that was beating a child? I wonder if we'd be going home that night or spending the next 25-40 years in a federal facility?
Anyhow, it's a terrible thing to have happened. I'd like to think that people didn't stop solely because they were disarmed... If I see a man violently beating a child on the side of the road, my first thought would be that he is deranged and a threat to my safety if I stop. Fortunately, even though Pennsylvania keeps me disarmed of a handgun, I would have the option of stopping, grabbing my trunk gun of choice, and stopping the threat at that point. But I could understand how the sh**ple could assume that if he were engaging in this kind of horrendous behavior, he most likely was carrying a weapon as well.
Or they were just typical sh**ple who were too wrapped up in their cell phone call to bother observing their surroundings.