-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Man fined $10K for defending his "property rights"
- Thread starter ne1
- Start date
Aran
Banned
imported post
Man Hit with $10,000 Stupid Tax.
Fixed that one for you.
Man Hit with $10,000 Stupid Tax.
Fixed that one for you.
Evil Ernie
Regular Member
imported post
Sheesh, I know where that place is...graduated not far from there Mifflinburg '89. That dude is a nut from the word go...
Sheesh, I know where that place is...graduated not far from there Mifflinburg '89. That dude is a nut from the word go...
Statkowski
Regular Member
imported post
Agree that he was indeed hit with a Stupid tax.
Then again, having survived such, loaded diapers can indeed pose a valid threat to one's life, family andbusiness. My kid's dumps would peel wallpaper three houses away!
Agree that he was indeed hit with a Stupid tax.
Then again, having survived such, loaded diapers can indeed pose a valid threat to one's life, family andbusiness. My kid's dumps would peel wallpaper three houses away!
deepdiver
Campaign Veteran
imported post
WTH is wrong with that guy? It only takes a few stupid gun owners to give the ammunition to the antis to paint us all with a broad brush.
WTH is wrong with that guy? It only takes a few stupid gun owners to give the ammunition to the antis to paint us all with a broad brush.
imperialism2024
Regular Member
imported post
Just remember folks, this is a result of not enough pro-shooting-people laws. If we had laws like Texas, then heros like this gentleman wouldn't have done anything illegal! Any real man would have shot all of those people who were trespassing.
Just remember folks, this is a result of not enough pro-shooting-people laws. If we had laws like Texas, then heros like this gentleman wouldn't have done anything illegal! Any real man would have shot all of those people who were trespassing.
Aran
Banned
imported post
Er...
Er...
Citizen
Founder's Club Member
imported post
deepdiver wrote:
I understand your concern, but there are always going to be a few nutcases.
Just remember that the anti-s paint themselves with the blood of the innocents who were deprived of the means to defend themselves. They brush themselves in it; they they shower in it, they wallow in it, they drink it at the altarof theirillusory utopia.
deepdiver wrote:
I understand your concern, but there are always going to be a few nutcases.
Just remember that the anti-s paint themselves with the blood of the innocents who were deprived of the means to defend themselves. They brush themselves in it; they they shower in it, they wallow in it, they drink it at the altarof theirillusory utopia.
Statkowski
Regular Member
imported post
b) Kind of hard to leave immediately while in the middle of changing a diaper.
c) Anyone who attempted to prosecute such a charge would be laughed out of court.
On the shooter's side, they did have a loaded diaper. If you've ever experienced one of them, they can indeed be deadly - known to make old ladies gag two blocks away.
a) They apparently were asked to leave, not told to leave.
b) Kind of hard to leave immediately while in the middle of changing a diaper.
c) Anyone who attempted to prosecute such a charge would be laughed out of court.
On the shooter's side, they did have a loaded diaper. If you've ever experienced one of them, they can indeed be deadly - known to make old ladies gag two blocks away.
imported post
ne1 wrote:
No sign would be required if this guy is the owner. Even if charged, the people could raise the defense of necessity. In any event, absent some missing information - there appears to be none, this guy is a nutjob and is getting off easy. Deadly force cannot be employed to cure a trespass (although I don't think there was one) even in Texas and that stupid comment, even in jest should be deleted. Smiley faces do not negate everything.
ne1 wrote:
No sign would be required if this guy is the owner. Even if charged, the people could raise the defense of necessity. In any event, absent some missing information - there appears to be none, this guy is a nutjob and is getting off easy. Deadly force cannot be employed to cure a trespass (although I don't think there was one) even in Texas and that stupid comment, even in jest should be deleted. Smiley faces do not negate everything.
Aegis
Regular Member
imported post
On Tuesday, Kumar pleaded no-contest to terroristic threats and told Judge Louise O. Knight, "I fired to get them to leave, in order to save my wife, family and property."
SO......what was in that diaper that put his wife, family, and property in mortal jepardy:uhoh:????
On Tuesday, Kumar pleaded no-contest to terroristic threats and told Judge Louise O. Knight, "I fired to get them to leave, in order to save my wife, family and property."
SO......what was in that diaper that put his wife, family, and property in mortal jepardy:uhoh:????
emailjobdetails
New member
imported post
imperialism2024
Regular Member
imported post
My eyes are bleeding after reading that last post...
I wonder, though, whether a lit cigarette or a fired round is more explosion-inducing. Especially if the bullet richochets and produces a hole that will cause more gas fumes. Poor choice, IMO.
My eyes are bleeding after reading that last post...
I wonder, though, whether a lit cigarette or a fired round is more explosion-inducing. Especially if the bullet richochets and produces a hole that will cause more gas fumes. Poor choice, IMO.
emailjobdetails
New member
imported post
imperialism2024
Regular Member
imported post
Nitrovic? Is that you?
I'm curious where the information in that post was derived... it provided a detailed account of the incident, albeit while entirely unformatted and utilizing gigantic paragraphs.
Nitrovic? Is that you?
I'm curious where the information in that post was derived... it provided a detailed account of the incident, albeit while entirely unformatted and utilizing gigantic paragraphs.
jack
Banned
imported post
Had a armed person been in or around the car the idiot "defending his property rights" could have been shot and killed, without violation of law occurring. He was playing with fire.
$10,000 seems cheap to me. He should have gotten some serious time.
Had a armed person been in or around the car the idiot "defending his property rights" could have been shot and killed, without violation of law occurring. He was playing with fire.
$10,000 seems cheap to me. He should have gotten some serious time.