sv_libertarian
State Researcher
imported post
The suspense is killing me!
The suspense is killing me!
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Well Heller will by out by Thursday...
- Thread starter sv_libertarian
- Start date
amlevin
Regular Member
imported post
They are saving the best for last. Just like that big christmas present for your kid.
They are saving the best for last. Just like that big christmas present for your kid.
bobernet
Founder's Club Member
imported post
If SCOTUSblog.com is to be believed, the court has said they are releasing all three remaining decisions on Thursday at 10a Eastern. Less than 24 hours to go.
If SCOTUSblog.com is to be believed, the court has said they are releasing all three remaining decisions on Thursday at 10a Eastern. Less than 24 hours to go.
sv_libertarian
State Researcher
imported post
amlevin wrote:
amlevin wrote:
I'm single. All big presents are for me and me alone! Bwwaahhaahhhaaa!!!!
rysa
Regular Member
imported post
sv_libertarian wrote:
sv_libertarian wrote:
lucky, im at the level of sox and dress shirts now....with 4 kids you'd think the creativity would be higher. I swear im buying myself a sig for christmas this year
PT111
Regular Member
imported post
rysa wrote:
rysa wrote:
I always buy myself a Christmas present. I put it under the tree and tag it To: Daddy From: Daddy. :lol:sv_libertarian wrote:lucky, im at the level of sox and dress shirts now....with 4 kids you'd think the creativity would be higher. I swear im buying myself a sig for christmas this year
Bear 45/70
Regular Member
imported post
PT111 wrote:
PT111 wrote:
I use the to "Dad from Santa". This way they know I bought it but there is no proof that will stand up in court, even her court. Besides would anybody doubt that Santa wouldn't give me a present? I'm always on the good boy list.rysa wrote:I always buy myself a Christmas present. I put it under the tree and tag it To: Daddy From: Daddy. :lol:sv_libertarian wrote:lucky, im at the level of sox and dress shirts now....with 4 kids you'd think the creativity would be higher. I swear im buying myself a sig for christmas this year
uncoolperson
Regular Member
imported post
I just told the wife, "hey, your getting this for me for christmas... as i got off the phone setting up the purchase"
she told me i had to wrap it though.
..... so i went and bought a holster!
I just told the wife, "hey, your getting this for me for christmas... as i got off the phone setting up the purchase"
she told me i had to wrap it though.
..... so i went and bought a holster!
sv_libertarian
State Researcher
imported post
Izzle wrote:
Izzle wrote:
No because in this state we have a higher protection of rights, plus preemption. In this case the higher protection of rights would be applicable.
joeroket
Regular Member
imported post
But depending on how the ruling is worded and the scope that is encompasses, providing it is in our favor, it could cause any future federal firearm ban to be unconstitutional.
But depending on how the ruling is worded and the scope that is encompasses, providing it is in our favor, it could cause any future federal firearm ban to be unconstitutional.
zakst1
Regular Member
imported post
I am so anxious...
I am so anxious...
uncoolperson
Regular Member
imported post
joeroket wrote:
or possibly (overreaching here) do something about the full auto thing, which could with the hand of a few legislators and a good lawyer or two do something about washington's restrictions on types of firearms.
does anyone else here really want to cut down a tree with an m-60, or is it just me?
joeroket wrote:
or possibly (overreaching here) do something about the full auto thing, which could with the hand of a few legislators and a good lawyer or two do something about washington's restrictions on types of firearms.
does anyone else here really want to cut down a tree with an m-60, or is it just me?
TechnoWeenie
Regular Member
imported post
5$ says they rule DC's ban unconstitutional, but say 'reasonable' regulation is OK.....(registration,licensing,etc)
5$ says they rule DC's ban unconstitutional, but say 'reasonable' regulation is OK.....(registration,licensing,etc)
joeroket
Regular Member
imported post
TechnoWeenie wrote:
TechnoWeenie wrote:
That's sucker bet. They alluded to that greatly during the arguments.
joeroket
Regular Member
imported post
uncoolperson wrote:
uncoolperson wrote:
That would be great but there is no way in hell they are going to touch that with a 50' pole. If they did that it would basically be an end to banning any "arm" that is used in the military.
Bear 45/70
Regular Member
imported post
TechnoWeenie wrote:
TechnoWeenie wrote:
I disagree. The 2nd is the only one of the ten that says, "shall not be infringed" which by that wordings means no restrictions can be applied.
Bear 45/70
Regular Member
imported post
Dr. Fresh wrote:
Dr. Fresh wrote:
The Justicestalked about it during the questioning phase and the inference was that if shall not be infringed is in fact the actuallymeaning then the NFA is unconstitution. Besides that law has never prevent one BG from using a machine gun when he felt like it.