joeroket
Regular Member
imported post
Dr. Fresh wrote:
Dr. Fresh wrote:
You ever hear of a battlefield nuke? Carried and shoulder fired by a single person.joeroket wrote:Not if they define "bear" as any weapon that can be carried and deployed by one person. Then you don't have to worry about nukes, etc.uncoolperson wrote:That would be great but there is no way in hell they are going to touch that with a 50' pole. If they did that it would basically be an end to banning any "arm" that is used in the military.joeroket wrote:But depending on how the ruling is worded and the scope that is encompasses, providing it is in our favor, it could cause any future federal firearm ban to be unconstitutional.
or possibly (overreaching here) do something about the full auto thing, which could with the hand of a few legislators and a good lawyer or two do something about washington's restrictions on types of firearms.
does anyone else here really want to cut down a tree with an m-60, or is it just me?