• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Definition of "loaded" carry, in AZ?

WhiteDingo

New member
Joined
Jun 26, 2008
Messages
3
Location
, ,
imported post

As stated in my other post, I'll be moving to AZ in about a month; the Prescott area to be specific. I'm a current resident of California, and as you can imagine, open carrying here is alot more problematic than I have read about in AZ.

For instance, here in CA, in order to open carry in most locations, the weapon must be fully exposed, be completely unloaded, and if it uses a magazine, said magazine must also be exposed (as it's considered part of the firearm). Revolver speedloaders don't fall under this restriction, but it's not a whole lot better.

My question is, what is the state of Arizona's definition of a "loaded" firearm? Can there be a magazine in the weapon, round in the chamber? Or does it need to not have a round in the chamber? I'd like to have this worked out before I move out, so I can start carrying right away.

In CA, in State Gov't. buildings, the definition of "loaded" is even having the ammunition for the firearm on your person!! So a buddy and I could walk into a state building, carrying each other's mags (as long as they're not compatible), and we'd be fine, theoretically....
 

AZkopper

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2008
Messages
675
Location
Prescott, Arizona, USA
imported post

You may open carry, fully loaded, with 1 in the chamber. If OC with no CCW permit, the handgun must be in a belt holster, and the holster must be "wholly or partially visible". Basically, if it is readily clear you are wearing a handgun or holster, you are OK.

You may OC a longgun, too, but it must be in a scabbard designed for the carrying of weapons, and also be "wholly or partially visible".

Loaded guns in cars (without CCW) must be either 1) in plain sight; 2) in a holster; 3) in a glovebox/center console box.

Per Yavapai Tribal PD, you can carry onTribal Lands (Frontier Village strip mall, specifically).

If a private business posts 'no weapons' or 'no guns' (any similar wording) at entrances, you are technically trespassing, and may be asked to leave. Refusal is then trespassing.

You cannot carry in a bar or a restaraunt that serves alcohol. You cannot carry at a public event that serves alcohol.

You cannot carry at a polling place, school (K-12), nuclear or hydroelectric plant.

The usual federal buildings are also victim zones.

If you go to a public establishment (town hall, etc) or public event (street fair, etc, where alcohol is not being served), and they deny you carrying there, they must provide you a secure place to store your gun that is readily available to you when you choose to leave.
 

Dahwg

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2008
Messages
661
Location
Tucson, Arizona, USA
imported post

AZkopper wrote:
You may open carry, fully loaded, with 1 in the chamber. If OC with no CCW permit, the handgun must be in a belt holster, and the holster must be "wholly or partially visible". Basically, if it is readily clear you are wearing a handgun or holster, you are OK.

You may OC a longgun, too, but it must be in a scabbard designed for the carrying of weapons, and also be "wholly or partially visible".

Loaded guns in cars (without CCW) must be either 1) in plain sight; 2) in a holster; 3) in a glovebox/center console box.

Per Yavapai Tribal PD, you can carry onTribal Lands (Frontier Village strip mall, specifically).

If a private business posts 'no weapons' or 'no guns' (any similar wording) at entrances, you are technically trespassing, and may be asked to leave. Refusal is then trespassing.

You cannot carry in a bar or a restaraunt that serves alcohol. You cannot carry at a public event that serves alcohol.

You cannot carry at a polling place, school (K-12), nuclear or hydroelectric plant.

The usual federal buildings are also victim zones.

If you go to a public establishment (town hall, etc) or public event (street fair, etc, where alcohol is not being served), and they deny you carrying there, they must provide you a secure place to store your gun that is readily available to you when you choose to leave.
About the best summation of AZ OC laws I've seen posted yet. :dude:
 

azcdlfred

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2006
Messages
901
Location
Tucson, Arizona, USA
imported post

WhiteDingo wrote:
My question is, what is the state of Arizona's definition of a "loaded" firearm?
In Arizona it makes no difference if your gun is loaded or unloaded - a firearm is a deadly weapon with or without ammo.

Fred
 

sddutch

New member
Joined
Jun 4, 2008
Messages
2
Location
, ,
imported post

AZkopper wrote:
You may OC a longgun, too, but it must be in a scabbard designed for the carrying of weapons, and also be "wholly or partially visible".

Just one comment: I don't think that a long gun "must" be carried in a scabbard designed for the carrying of weapons. I think a scabbard is just another method of carry that is available to an individual who wants to openly carry a long gun.

I have openly carried my AK-47 slung over my shoulder while riding my mountain bike out to the desert to go shooting and I put the ammunition and spare mags ina backpack; I havedone thismany times and it wasn't a problem.
 

Alec411

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2008
Messages
230
Location
PHX AZ, ,
imported post

Once again AZKOPPER is correct. TO THE LETTER OF THE LAW! However, many will

look the other way at OC if he can reasonably assume that you are 'jus' goin shootin"

None of this:banghead:in AZ gun laws, just be courtieous!
 

protector84

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
624
Location
Arizona, U.S.
imported post

No, AZKopper like many others here on this issue is NOT correct. Either people here are incapable of reading a simple document or are imagining that the law says things that simply aren't there. I guess I have to spell it out for the 100th time:
A. A person commits misconduct involving weapons by knowingly:

1. Carrying a deadly weapon without a permit pursuant to section 13-3112 except a pocket knife concealed on his person; or

It is clear here that this statute refers soley to concealed carry of weapons which is authorized by the section 13-3112 if one holds a valid permit according to that section. It doesn't say anything about "carrying a deadly weapon" in general but simply carrying one without the required permit that is relevant to the said section of the statute. Please take note of the bold print that I emphasized.
2. Carrying a deadly weapon without a permit pursuant to section 13-3112 concealed within immediate control of any person in or on a means of transportation; or
Same as above. This refers to concealed carry without a permit. Both of these statutes specifically refer to carry without a concealed weapons permit issued by DPS in the statute. Nothing here is said or makes any reference at all to "open carry" of weapons.

F. Subsection A, paragraph 1 of this section shall not apply to a weapon or weapons carried in a belt holster which holster is wholly or partially visible, or carried in a scabbard or case designed for carrying weapons which scabbard or case is wholly or partially visible or carried in luggage.

This is where people for some strange reason continue to get confused. This is still talking about concealed carry as that is what Subsection A, paragraph 1 is about. If it wasn't about concealed carry, it wouldn't have said "pursuant to section 13-3112" which is about the DPS-issued concealed weapons permit. This section F contains exemptions to certain types of concealed carry. If a gun is in luggage, then it is naturally concealed. If a gun is in a case, it is concealed. If aweapon is in a holster or scabbard, naturally part of the weapon is going to be concealed (the part that is inside the holster or scabbard). This exemption is designed most likely to avoid technicalities over open carry where part of the weapon is indeed concealed. No where does this statute mandate that open carry must be done in this fashion. Again, it allows certain types of concealed carry. For one, the entire weapon can be concealed as long as the holster, scabbard, or case it is in is visible. If it was required that you had to have the gun in some type of case or holster at all times, it would say so. Show me where it says "must have in case/holster" because I don't see it there. You can stand right on the street corner passing your firearms around to your friends showing each other your pieces but as long as you are not handling them in a dangeorus or reckless manner, it is legal. If you can finda statute showing me you cannot do that, please post it here. Luggage, I assume, would refer to things like suitcases and backpacks. Not so sure about purses. This says you can carry concealed without the concealed permit if the gun is inside your luggage. Not rocket science to figure out.

Subsection A, paragraph 2 of this section shall not apply to a weapon or weapons carried in a case, holster, scabbard, pack or luggage that is carried within a means of transportation or within a storage compartment, map pocket, trunk or glove compartment of a means of transportation.

Again, paragraph 2 is specifically about the DPS-issued concealed weapons permit and this part of section F provides further exemptions. This is where the "two action" concept comes forth. Notice how this portion says absolutely nothing about the gun or other weapon having to be visible. It says nothing about visible weapons here. All it says is that the gun has to be inside of some type of "case." If your gun is under the seat and not in a holster, you will need to have a CCW permit. If the gun is under the seat but in a holster, it is exempted by this section. If a gun is in some type of "case" such as a holster, it would require "two actions" to use it--uncasing it and firing it vs. one action--simply grabing it and firing it. They teach you in the CCW permit class, that state law considers a holstered gun for the purposes of this section as "cased." Now one can reasonably assume that this exemption does not apply to to a gun that is actually on one's person while in the vehicle as paragraph 1 refers to that portion. So if the holstered gun is being worn by you while you are driving, paragraph 1 would apply but if the gun was somewhere else in the car and not on anyone's person, paragraph 2 applies.

You can read the entire weapons and explosives section up and down, and you won't find anything about open carry which means that open carry is legal here. You can walk around all you want with an AK-47, shotgun, sword, bow and arrows, etc. Just don't conceal them unless you either have the permit or at least have the "case" visible if they are in a type of case (such as a holster) and don't point them at other people or display them in a reckless, threatening, or dangerous manner. Unless you can prove otherwise with actual quotes from the statutes, I rest my case.
 

Dahwg

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2008
Messages
661
Location
Tucson, Arizona, USA
imported post

We can read the statue until we're blue in the face, we can all come to some conclusion as to what the statute means, and we can alsob be unanimous in our opinion. But that means squat! We can't really read the statute without knowing the case law. We need to know what the court says the statute means, so we can continue to pick over the statute, but at best we're parsing words and engaging in a pissing contest. If you want to know the full score, you need to have the case law plain and simple.
 

Alec411

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2008
Messages
230
Location
PHX AZ, ,
imported post

HAVING LOOKED AT "PROTECTOR'"S PRESENTATION OF THE TOTAL OF APPLICABLE STATUTES; HIS CONCLUSION CAN NOT BE REFUTED. BY NOT ADDRESSING "OPEN CARRY" THE LEGISLATURE CLEARLY "DOES NOT" PROHIBIT CARRY IN THE MANNER DESCRIBED IN THE ORIGINAL STATUTE.

PROTECTOR -- THANKS FOR ALL YOUR EFFORTS & WORK

RETIRED FED GS-1811
 

Sonora Rebel

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,956
Location
Gone
imported post

ARMS... in general. There is no provion I know of that permits a concealed large sheath knife... but you can wear one on yer hip (visible) any length. Sword too if ya wanna.

'The right of the people to keep and bear arms indefense of themselves or the state shall not be impaired" Art 26 AZ Constitution

Justice Scalia: (Heller vs DC)

"The Second Amendment applies prima facie to all instruments constituting bearable arms. " That blew right past the talkin' heads.
 

azcdlfred

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2006
Messages
901
Location
Tucson, Arizona, USA
imported post

Sonora Rebel wrote:
ARMS... in general. There is no provion I know of that permits a concealed large sheath knife... but you can wear one on yer hip (visible) any length. Sword too if ya wanna.

'The right of the people to keep and bear arms indefense of themselves or the state shall not be impaired" Art 26 AZ Constitution

(1). It is a "concealed weapons" permit and is not limited to guns. You probably need a concealed weapons permit to conceal a large knife. Onemy fellow CCW instructors had a student who wanted to carry a sword under his coat.

(2). Dano v. Collins in 1990 determined that "shall not be impaired" in Article 2, Section 26 of the Arizona Constitution does not apply to the carrying of concealed weapons. That's why we have a CCW permit process.

(3). State v. Adams in 1994 determined that even "open carry"can be considered concelaed carry subject to the point of view ofthe observer.

Fred
 

like_the_roman

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2008
Messages
293
Location
Tucson, Arizona, USA
imported post

azcdlfred wrote:
(1).  It is a "concealed weapons" permit and is not limited to guns.  You probably need a concealed weapons permit to conceal a large knife.  One my fellow CCW instructors had a student who wanted to carry a sword under his coat.

What is considered "large"? The ARS says it's illegal conceal a deadly weapon except a "pocket knife," but there is no definition of length or even what a "pocket knife" looks like. I suppose if one could find a way to safely (though probably not comfortably) carry a bowie knife in one's front pocket, you wouldn't be violating the statute though I certainly wouldn't want to be the test case.
 

Sonora Rebel

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,956
Location
Gone
imported post

I dunno case law... I don't conceal nuthin'... other than when I have my slicker on. But... I do have a CCW. 'Never thought of concealing a knife (why?). I wear one now 'n then on my gunbelt...
 

Sonora Rebel

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,956
Location
Gone
imported post

Some places... (most places) just say 'No Weapons'. That'd include knives.
 

like_the_roman

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2008
Messages
293
Location
Tucson, Arizona, USA
imported post

Sonora Rebel wrote:
Some places... (most places) just say 'No Weapons'.  That'd include knives.

My credit union says "no firearms" not "no weapons."

Additionally, you can take knives into restaurants that have a liquor license.
 
Top