Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: ACLU Being blasted...

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Battle Creek, ,
    Posts
    559

    Post imported post

    From http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.p...p;pageId=68695 World Net Daily
    Hundreds of comments have been posted in just the first few days of July, almost uniformly condemning the ACLU's explanation of its position on gun rights, which is that individuals don't have them.

    "The ACLU interprets the Second Amendment as a collective right. Therefore, we disagree with the Supreme Court's decision in D.C. v. Heller," the page started. "While the decision is a significant and historic reinterpretation of the right to keep and bear arms, the decision leaves many important questions unanswered that will have to be resolved in future litigation, including what regulations are permissible, and which weapons are embraced by the Second Amendment right that the Court has now recognized."
    http://blog.aclu.org/2008/07/01/hell.../#comment-1619" ACLU Blog in case you want to add your twe cents worth.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Memphis, Tennessee, USA
    Posts
    104

    Post imported post

    WOW...I just read the whole comments section, even the Liberals are ******* pissed. The ACLU is taking an assfucking on this one big time :celebrate

    They are losing members and contributions left and right if one is to believe the comments left on their blog :celebrate

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Tennessee, ,
    Posts
    695

    Post imported post

    crotalus01 wrote:
    They are losing members and contributions left and right if one is to believe the comments left on their blog :celebrate
    good. quite frankly, they need to be shut down.

  4. #4
    Founder's Club Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Fairfax Co., VA
    Posts
    18,766

    Post imported post

    unreconstructed1 wrote:
    crotalus01 wrote:
    They are losing members and contributions left and right if one is to believe the comments left on their blog :celebrate
    good. quite frankly, they need to be shut down.
    Or, taken over by someone who can use the name correctly.
    I'll make you an offer: I will argue and fight for all of your rights, if you will do the same for me. That is the only way freedom can work. We have to respect all rights, all the time--and strive to win the rights of the other guy as much as for ourselves.

    If I am equal to another, how can I legitimately govern him without his express individual consent?

    There is no human being on earth I hate so much I would actually vote to inflict government upon him.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    62

    Post imported post

    The ALCU is a mouthpiece for the left, nothing more. The people have spoken, time and time again. We want the federal government to leave us alone and we want our firearms. This is non-negotiable! If you're going to take us on, you're going to catch hell for it.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
    Posts
    3,806

    Post imported post

    Serves those bastages right.

    (Picture swiped from http://patriotshop.us )


    Hey, you guys should trust the ACLU’s decision to go against DC v. Heller.

    I mean, after all, only the government should be allowed to speak, and you should only have protection from search and seizure when you’re out in public, right?

    Right?
    Why open carry? Because 1911 > 911.

  7. #7
    Campaign Veteran deepdiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Southeast, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    5,974

    Post imported post

    Reinterpreted the 2A? I am not surprised that a collectivist organization sees it as a collectivist right. However, I am surprised that an organization which sees so many things not in the constitution as "rights" that they so easily dismiss the 2A as an individual right.
    Bob Owens @ Bearing Arms (paraphrased): "These people aren't against violence; they're very much in favor of violence. They're against armed resistance."

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Yorktown VA
    Posts
    110

    Post imported post

    AbNo wrote:
    (Picture swiped from http://patriotshop.us )
    The http://patriotpost.us/is a fantastic organization. I've been reading them for many years - back when they were "The Federalist"

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    4 hours south of HankT, ,
    Posts
    5,121

    Post imported post

    AbNo wrote:
    Serves those bastages right.

    (Picture swiped from http://patriotshop.us )
    Isn't "enemy of the state" considered a badge of honor? Isn't that what communists called people who opposed them? What nazis called people who opposed them? What Sean Hannity calls people who opposed Bush? What Hillary thinks of those who opposed Bill?

    As far as I can tell, ACLU is a FRIEND OF THE STATE.

    Let them burn down. Like someone else said, it's time for a house-cleaning and a newer, more sensible guard for our liberties.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •