joeroket
Regular Member
imported post
jbone wrote:
jbone wrote:
That scenario is exactly why the anticipatory laws are worded the way they are. You must take a substantial step towards commiting the crime. Just speaking the words "I could have...." does not fall under it.peekaboo wrote
Not to incite anything as I’m PRO LEO, father’s a retired COP. But let’s say a non-LEO walk’s up to a complete stranger and says:
"I could have taken your gun from you, and put a bullet in your head just now."
The stranger feels his life has been threatened and calls 911. Police respond. What next? Will that person be arrested? Stranger wants to file charges on the fact they have implied to commit harm buy the words spoken.
Introduce that person speaking the words carrying a gun; has this person violated any law by implying they could have committed murder while in possession of a gun? My not being a legal mined person or LE savvy is why I ask.
LEO or not, any person needs to exercise common sense and sound judgment when dealing with others, and choose their words wisely. Would be my guess the Officer’s were packing and failed to handle the encounter wisely as fellow citizens sense you say “No police powers were exercised