• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Why Open Carry? -- What Would You Include?

kingmonkey

Campaign Veteran
Joined
May 28, 2008
Messages
38
Location
, ,
imported post

I'm working on a handout that I can give to people as part of my own little educational campaign to drum up support for open carry in Texas. What points would you bring out to help people understand the benefits of open carry?
 

DopaVash

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2008
Messages
313
Location
Graham, Texas
imported post

Well the obvious of course:

Its a constitutional and god-given right.
It deters would-be criminals from acts of violence.
It is very functional for carriers in the Texas heat.



I think the beautiful thing about OC is that it and all of it's benefits are so obvious. I think it would be prudent to include a Frequently Asked Questions of all the common anti's counter-arguments and how we address them. And of course links to this site and TXCDL.org too.
 

DopaVash

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2008
Messages
313
Location
Graham, Texas
imported post

Felid`Maximus wrote:
I heard a police officer say he likes open carry because it allows him to know in advance that someone is armed.


I thought about that too, but I'm not sure that Texans would appreciate that part, not as a selling point anyhow. Texans are typically (and justly, I would say [I'm a Texan haha!]) are atleast somewhat paranoid of their government taking their guns.


I think the probably the FIRST thing to be on the Faq would be "So, what, you want to go back to the 'Old West'? Answer that by saying how the 'Old West' was actually a much, much safer place than modern-day city life, and then go on to say that it's not what we're looking for. Rather that we want to exercise our rights as Americans to Bear the arms that we Keep openly, as a deturrance from crime. Cite how an estimated 2.5 million times a year firearms are used in self defense, most of the time the mere presence of a firearm in the right hands fends off a criminal act, without ever firing!
 

Mokarov_9mm

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2008
Messages
34
Location
Centreville, Virginia, USA
imported post

It's hard to imagine the great state of Texas having an opencarry problem....

One would think it had been taken care of long ago while G.Bush was Gov.

We're all pullin for you folks there to be brought onboard...good luck.
 

icode

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
275
Location
Henderson, Nevada, USA
imported post

Crime deterrant

Public display of a God given right

Statement of having taken on the responsibility for your own safety

2A activism

Crime deterrant

Accessibility to the most useful selfdefense tool
 

Ebeye

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2008
Messages
28
Location
Logan, UT, ,
imported post

Only free men can protect themselves (and other innocents). Slaves aren't allowed to.

Because this is America, not China or Russia.
 

irfner

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Nov 24, 2007
Messages
434
Location
SeaTac, Washington, USA
imported post

I posted this on another thread but it fits. "Thieves and other bad guys will usually size up an opportunity before they act. An openly carried firearm may deter a robbery or assault. Even when armedthemselves bad guys don't like to get shot. So they will just shop elsewhere sincethere is an abundance of sheeple available for the picking. A firearm carried CC only reacts after the assault has begun. To pull or show it sooner is brandishing. CC is great for stopping an assault but it does little in the way of prevention. Then of course not carrying at all leaves you completely at the mercy of the BG. Good luck on that. So you are left with the following three choices. OC for prevention. CC to stop a crime in progress.Don't carry and be a victim. Choose your own comfort level."
 

Phoenixphire

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jun 10, 2008
Messages
396
Location
Battle Creek, Michigan, USA
imported post

I have an issue with the "It's Your Right" line as the primary point on an informational flier.

It tends to imply one should do something because they can, not because they desire to do so.


It is also your right to go stand in front of the local courthouse, and say "hippy biibbity boob-ul-nuts" while dancing Riverdance, as each person walks by. After all, such an action would be protected under the First Amendment.

But just because you can, doesn't mean you do.


My point is this: Think of it from the perspective of the person receiving the flier.

What would you think if a group of four persons were outside the Post Office, two singing "hippy biibbity boob-ul-nuts" while doing the Riverdance, while two others handed out fliers letting you know that it is your natural RIGHT to do so?

My response would be along the lines of: "Ok, then... Thanks for letting me know." But, by no means, would I be convinced that next Tuesday, I need to head on over to the local park, and do some Riverdancing.


A flier should contain, primarily, information about WHY one should carry a firearm.

My favorite is the ole' health insurance / spare tire / seatbelt arguement.

Why do you have/use (insert from above)? Not because you want to pay for it/use it, but it would be foolish not to have/not to use.

Additional information would be local police response times, specific citations of violence in your community where everyone was helpless, information on local clubs and saftey instructors, etc.

The key is MAKE IT PERSONAL. Give the person information that shows the problem, and the solution.

Including information on your local, county, and state laws is helpful. Including information on rights guaranteed by your State Constitution and the Federal Constitution is important. Just don't make it the FOCUS of the flier, but rather a PART of the overall picture.
 

Phoenixphire

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jun 10, 2008
Messages
396
Location
Battle Creek, Michigan, USA
imported post

Also, Mr. Oleg Volk has provided the RKBA community with incredible imagery to support activism.



A copy of my correspondence, by email, with him:


My initial letter:

Dear Mr. Volk:

I would like to find out about obtaining permission to use some of your very compelling imagery as educational materials.

I am active in the right to keep and bear arms fight, and I love the simple way your work conveys a point, much more effectively than I can.


Please let me know what I need to do to use your materials.


Thank you.

Sincerely,

(Name Removed For Forum Purposes)


His reply:

As long as you are using them to promote RKBA, you are welcome to use any of the posters and gun-related illustrations. Only commercial uses require a discussion because of a few images that have restrictive model releases.
 

Tess

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2006
Messages
3,837
Location
Bryan, TX
imported post

kingmonkey wrote:
I'm working on a handout that I can give to people as part of my own little educational campaign to drum up support for open carry in Texas. What points would you bring out to help people understand the benefits of open carry?
More rapid access to the firearm in the unthinkable event it was needed.

Deterrent. Criminals choose the weak and defenseless. The fact they can see you are neither keeps them away.

Concealment is difficult or impossible in some circumstances, seasons, or clothing.
 

Loneviking

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2008
Messages
344
Location
Carson City, Nevada, USA
imported post

I'll add another one thats not on the list---safety! A gun in a belt or a shoulderholster is about the safest way to carry. With a deep concealment or IWB rig, there is always the chance of an accidental discharge, which can do considerable damage to you!
 

Diver_59

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2008
Messages
48
Location
, ,
imported post

DopaVash wrote:
Well the obvious of course:

Its a constitutional and god-given right.
It deters would-be criminals from acts of violence.
It is very functional for carriers in the Texas heat.



I think the beautiful thing about OC is that it and all of it's benefits are so obvious. I think it would be prudent to include a Frequently Asked Questions of all the common anti's counter-arguments and how we address them. And of course links to this site and TXCDL.org too.
I wouldn't go so far as to say it was a "GOD" givin right....but it is a right of ours in the constitution.
 

icode

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
275
Location
Henderson, Nevada, USA
imported post

Diver_59 wrote:
DopaVash wrote:
Well the obvious of course:

Its a constitutional and god-given right.
It deters would-be criminals from acts of violence.
It is very functional for carriers in the Texas heat.



I think the beautiful thing about OC is that it and all of it's benefits are so obvious. I think it would be prudent to include a Frequently Asked Questions of all the common anti's counter-arguments and how we address them. And of course links to this site and TXCDL.org too.
I wouldn't go so far as to say it was a "GOD" givin right....but it is a right of ours in the constitution.
You don't think that God has given you the right to protect the very life that he gave you?
 

DanM

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2008
Messages
1,928
Location
West Bloomfield, Michigan, USA
imported post

icode wrote:
Diver_59 wrote:
I wouldn't go so far as to say it was a "GOD" givin right....but it is a right of ours in the constitution.
You don't think that God has given you the right to protect the very life that he gave you?
I don't think Diver is saying that God gave you life, but not necessarily the right to protect it. I think Diver is saying to leave the "God" premise completely out of the argument.

From a logical and practical standpoint, I think leaving God out has more merit than leaving him in.

Logically, by leaving God in as a premise, you open up your argument tomore avenues of attack. Opponents may argue against your gun rights byarguing that you must substantiate yourpremises:

1)God exists.

2)God gave man life.

3)God gaveman the right to defend the life given in #2 (yes, this is a separate step you would have to substantiate, if challenged).

From a practical standpoint, leaving God out broadens the appeal of the argument to those who don't believe that gods exist. Without God, the argument for gun rights is still solid and encompassesnot onlythe religious but the non-religious as well.
 

icode

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
275
Location
Henderson, Nevada, USA
imported post

DanM wrote:
icode wrote:
Diver_59 wrote:
I wouldn't go so far as to say it was a "GOD" givin right....but it is a right of ours in the constitution.
You don't think that God has given you the right to protect the very life that he gave you?
I don't think Diver is saying that God gave you life, but not necessarily the right to protect it. I think Diver is saying to leave the "God" premise completely out of the argument.

From a logical and practical standpoint, I think leaving God out has more merit than leaving him in.

Logically, by leaving God in as a premise, you open up your argument tomore avenues of attack. Opponents may argue against your gun rights byarguing that you must substantiate yourpremises:

1)God exists.

2)God gave man life.

3)God gaveman the right to defend the life given in #2 (yes, this is a separate step you would have to substantiate, if challenged).

From a practical standpoint, leaving God out broadens the appeal of the argument to those who don't believe that gods exist. Without God, the argument for gun rights is still solid and encompassesnot onlythe religious but the non-religious as well.
Understood, I believe this is why many have begun using the term "nature given right". Even if "you" don't believe in God "you" must believe that we have certain "natural" rights. Of course if "you" don't then the argument is pointless :banghead:
 
Top