-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Moms Against Guns
- Thread starter Grapeshot
- Start date
imported post
mjf wrote:
mjf wrote:
You mean it's not a add for the special olymicsThat's just plain silly... they are calling the PA state legislature irresponsible.
Hmm, here's a photo of champions....
What could be cooler than wearing a "hey everyone, I'm unarmed shirt?" Well, I suppose when you have protection by the police and other armed guards it doesn't matter if you're armed.
marshaul
Campaign Veteran
imported post
deepdiver wrote:
I agree. These days, "Mothers Against..." is pretty much shorthand for "government-funded overemotional, reactionary lobby group with the primary function of abrogating your rights." I like the idea of uniting them as "Mothers Against Freedom." It's honest, unlike the rest of the "mad mothers."
deepdiver wrote:
I agree. These days, "Mothers Against..." is pretty much shorthand for "government-funded overemotional, reactionary lobby group with the primary function of abrogating your rights." I like the idea of uniting them as "Mothers Against Freedom." It's honest, unlike the rest of the "mad mothers."
Thundar
Regular Member
imported post
You could put heat onClearchannel by sending in letters to other advertisers threatening to boycott their product because of their economicsupport ofa known anti-civil rights business (Clearchannel).
If this letter were followed up by some petitions a few days later you might get some traction. Clearchannel may not back down this time, but if there were financial repercussions from customers, then maybe they would not do that sort of thing again.
You could put heat onClearchannel by sending in letters to other advertisers threatening to boycott their product because of their economicsupport ofa known anti-civil rights business (Clearchannel).
If this letter were followed up by some petitions a few days later you might get some traction. Clearchannel may not back down this time, but if there were financial repercussions from customers, then maybe they would not do that sort of thing again.
TheMrMitch
Regular Member
imported post
mjf wrote:
The female has loose Efferdent.
The black has to pee.....bad.
The one on the right doesn't think we know he's pinching the black's butt.
**I'm a professional face reader. Yeah...I am. Sure.:what:
mjf wrote:
The one on the left wants to giggle.That's just plain silly... they are calling the PA state legislature irresponsible.
Hmm, here's a photo of champions....
What could be cooler than wearing a "hey everyone, I'm unarmed shirt?" Well, I suppose when you have protection by the police and other armed guards it doesn't matter if you're armed.
The female has loose Efferdent.
The black has to pee.....bad.
The one on the right doesn't think we know he's pinching the black's butt.
**I'm a professional face reader. Yeah...I am. Sure.:what: