Bear 45/70 wrote:
It's an attack on a moronic idea, if it is his idea, that's his problem not mine. Besides he is an affront to all gun owners with his attitude.
So an attorney, that is also a gun guy who's on our side, opinion means nothing to you? Gee, who the hell you going to get to defend you when you have a problem then?
You must not read my post's... I told you that I am a gun owner. At one time I owned a G20/21, RSRH .480, SA Loaded .45acp, Ruger #1 SS .375 H&H Magnum, Remington 700BDL w/composite stock .338 RUM & K&D Muzzle Break, .308 Winchester Stealth Bull Barrel Varmint Rifle and last but not least a Browning .270 WSM. I have sold them all off cause of financial difficulties due to medical issues. I currently own a P220, SP101 .357mag and looking to purchase a Kahr K40 or P229 in .40 cal.
I myself just have a tendancy to vote the party looking at the whole picture instead one issue like you seem to do, you are so narrow minded!
As also I have posted before. You think that Gun Ownership is just for the CON
servatives? Again as usual you are wrong.
I really don't know why you post these recent political threads? You want to post your thoughts/opinions you ought to go to faux newsor Doc Savage and post on their blogs. I come to this forum to learn about issues pertaining to Open Carrying not discussing the campaigns of either party.
You are not going to change my views and neither am I going to change yours so we should just move on, thats the American way right? Isn't democracy grand...