2a4all
Regular Member
imported post
It's good to see the D/P take a stand for enforcing the existing laws that proscribe illegal gun use. We certainly don't need MORE anti-gun laws.
http://www.dailypress.com/news/opinion/dp-ed_guns_edit_0812aug12,0,6492865.story
It would help Law Abiding Gun Owners a great deal if the D/P would support an effort to get rid of "foolish" gun laws. Open carry only in restaurants that serve alcohol is a prime example.
Not only do Concealed Handgun Permit (CHP) holders undergo background checks when they buy their firearms, they have also submitted themselves to additional checks when they applied for their CHPs. Why are they considered more of a risk when carrying concealed in a restaurant than individuals carrying openly who don't have a CHP (who perhaps bought his/her gun from an "unlicensed dealer")?
It's good to see the D/P take a stand for enforcing the existing laws that proscribe illegal gun use. We certainly don't need MORE anti-gun laws.
http://www.dailypress.com/news/opinion/dp-ed_guns_edit_0812aug12,0,6492865.story
It would help Law Abiding Gun Owners a great deal if the D/P would support an effort to get rid of "foolish" gun laws. Open carry only in restaurants that serve alcohol is a prime example.
Not only do Concealed Handgun Permit (CHP) holders undergo background checks when they buy their firearms, they have also submitted themselves to additional checks when they applied for their CHPs. Why are they considered more of a risk when carrying concealed in a restaurant than individuals carrying openly who don't have a CHP (who perhaps bought his/her gun from an "unlicensed dealer")?