• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Selecting a "starter" 1911

Dustin

Regular Member
Joined
May 28, 2008
Messages
1,723
Location
Lake Charles Area, Louisiana, USA
imported post

Lykosis wrote:
If your budget has increased to the $800 - $900 range, and your hand is big enough for a double stack .45, I would suggest a Para Ordnance P14.45.

I love Springfield.

But having a P14 1911 that holds 15 .45 ACP sounds very interesting. :what:
 

RIAShooter

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
173
Location
Florence, Kentucky, USA
imported post

I own a Rock Island 1911 and it is my primary carry weapon, this is by far the best buy for the money, I've put close to 1000 rounds through mine without any type of jam or failure, and I've put just about every ammo from wolf through hydra shocks, and I have yet to find anything it won't eat up.

Guns and ammo put the Rock Island 1911 and 3 others I believe they were Taurus, Springfield and Para Ordiance's and the Rock Island didn't fail even after some test when the Taurus and Para did google it and read for yourself.
 

Evil Ernie

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
779
Location
Castle Rock, Colorado, USA
imported post

Statesman wrote:
Here's my baby with the older Hogue grips:
And we know this is true, because it's sitting on a soft paper towel, and not the hard unfinished wood. A true sign of something valued.
LOL Very true!!! I figure if I trust my life and those of my family with it, it needs to be valued highly, and treated as such. Well that and a paper towel adds good contrast..heh..
 

AbNo

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,805
Location
Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
imported post

Another RIA owner here.

Other than wanting a smooth-faced trigger, I've been quite happy with mine. It does what it was originally designed to do: Place .45 ACP slugs in reasonable group size at pistol distances, and do so even with little to no cleaning if need be.


The other thing I love? it's a low-cost baseline model, and I can stick all the aftermarket parts (like a smooth-faced trigger) in it I like. Then again, I build my own computers and tinker with my Jeep as well, so maybe that's just for me.

Still, I enjoy my RIA, and I carry it often when I go out.

From around the web....
People that gripe about unreliable 1911s are using super-tight race guns, and that was not JMB's original design. The original 1911 was loose, designed to function in horrid conditions, and just keep going.
 

mdguy90

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2008
Messages
51
Location
, ,
imported post

I'm gonna have to throw my vote to SA

not to say that RIA is a bad choice, It's that SA's customer service is among the best.

heres my mil-spec




IMG_2435.jpg
 

JD

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
75
Location
Central Iowa, USA
imported post

I'm going to try and post a series of posts that I've written up into a blog and see if it will fit we'll see....I don't know how the formatting will turn out, so don't be too harsh if it looks odd when posted.

Part 1
So every now and then (every other week) it seems someone asks for input on which 1911 to buy, or which 1911 is best. This is going to cover most of the bases on 1911s, some of you may be reading this and thinking “Why should I give a hoot what this guy thinks or has to say?” We’ll let me just say it now, I’m no expert, I’m not a gun smith, I’m not a professional shooter, I’m not some ex-Navy seal that’s killed umpteen million people with a 1911 and one arm tied behind my back, I’m just a prior Marine Corps Radio Tech that moderates a gun forum and has had over a dozen 1911s from different makers, some have been good, some great and some horrible, I’ve had (between the wife and I that is): 1 Llama, 2 Colts, 4 Paras, 4 Kimbers, 1 Springfield, 1 Les Baer, 1 Wilson Combat, and one Ithaca that just sits in the safe telling war stories to the other guns in it’s company. I’ve learned a lot about 1911s, shot plenty of other 1911s, and heard many a horror story about them as well has lived my own horror stories, and I’m the last person that will give a rat’s ass what you have to say about what I have to say, so let’s get to it shall we. To say that one 1911 is better than all the others is just not accurate, some are better than others, but there is no "One 1911 to rule them all" Before we get started, let’s take a minute to familiarize ourselves with some 1911 terminology. Series 80: In most terms this refers to the Colt series 80 and mainly it reflects that it has a firing pin safety, most makers of 1911s incorporate this type of firing pin safety in their design. The series 80 firing pin safety incorporates a firing pin block that prevents the firing pin from moving unless the trigger is pulled. Personally, I can’t tell the difference in trigger pull, but that’s just me and I don’t obsess over what my trigger pull is, it’s sweet, that’s all that matters. Here is a picture of the series 80 firing pin system. Kimber uses a different firing pin safety known as the Swartz Safety that was originally used in Colt pistols (briefly) but was abandoned, this design is actuated by the depressing of the grip safety and care must be used in assembly that the grip safety is not depressed as that will cause the lifter to protrude from the frame and can be damaged by the installation of the slide. Of the two, I prefer the Colt series 80 design as removal of it does not require the removal of the rear sight like the Swartz safety, not that I would ever advocate the removal of a safety device. Sizes: Government Model: This now a days generally refers to any 5” 1911 in standard configuration, it has the full 5” non bushing barrel and full frame which will hold with modern magazines 8 rounds of ammunition. Commander model: The original Commander model has a 4.25” bbl with bushing and full frame, several makers do not use the bushing barrel, but instead have a 4” bull barrel instead with a full frame, for Kimber this is the Pro model, and Springfield refers to it as the Champion. CCO: This was the Concealed Carry Officers model since discontinued by Colt; this was the 4.25” upper from a Commander mated to the compact frame of the Officers model which with modern magazines hold 7 rounds. For Kimber this is the Compact model, several others make guns in this configuration or a similar variation and their nomenclature differs. Officers: Originally this was a 3.5” barrel on a compact frame which is .5” shorter than the full frame of the Gov’t model and Commander. With modern magazines this will hold 7 rounds of ammunition. Springfield refers to this size as the “Compact” model. Defender: This is a 3” upper on a compact frame, these models in most if not all cases will have a 3” bushing-less bull barrel. Kimber refers to this as the “Ultra”, while Springfield refers to it as the Micro, other makers have different nomenclature for guns of similar size.
I know that there are 1911 pistols with 3 inch, 4 inch , and 5 inch barrels available. Which length is the best choice for a balance of reliability, accuracy, proper ballistics performance, and concealment?
Looking at the factors you have listed:
A 5" gun will have the most accuracy and ballistic performance, but the least amount of concealment. A 4" will have better accuracy and performance than a 3" gun, and is moderately easier to conceal. A 3" Has the least amount of accuracy and terminal performance of the sizes, but generally is the easiest of the 3 to conceal. Now looking at my statements, please understand that concealing a 5" gun is not a hard thing to do, as you can see above, a great number of members here (myself included) do it every day, as a matter of fact I'm doing it right now. So to answer your question, a new in the box, 4"-4.25" 1911 will most likely be the balance of what you desire without being currently familiar with the 1911. The Commander sized guns are the happy man in the middle so to speak, they are not as long as the 5" so they will clear the holster more quickly, and still offer more recoil absorbing mass, while still maintaining a longer barrel and sight radius. So here's where it gets tricky, the hardest thing to conceal on any gun, is the grip area of the firearm. While the smaller Officers size gun have a shorter grip to ease concealment, you're cutting your slide mass, sight radius, and barrel length. While some have no problem concealing the grip (see my bit on the 5" guns) some do. So if you want the benefits of a Commander sized gun (4"-4.25"), but also want the benefits of an Officer's size gun (3") you need to get a gun with the Commander length slide and barrel, but has the officers size frame like the Colt CCO, and the Kimber Compact. There are other makers of this style 1911, but I'm not going to list them all for you.:bier: Regarding magazines: The original mags for the Government held 7 rounds, while the Officers model held 6 rounds, so how do you get 8 rounds in a 7 round mag? You chop the skirt of the follower. Generally I prefer the Tripp Research Cobra mags, Wilson 47D mags, or the newer version of Chip McCormick mags, I could probably do a whole other Blog on 1911 magazines, and probably will so I won’t go into detail, all I’m going to say in this piece is in most cases, you’re better off ditching the mags that come with your thousand dollar shooter and spend about $100 on good magazines… …that kind of sucks doesn’t it?:thinking:
 

JD

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
75
Location
Central Iowa, USA
imported post

Part 2

So first let’s look at some of the different companies making 1911s, this is a really long list and it's not even complete. I group the manufacturers in to three tiers by overall cost of their average gun.
Auto Ordnance
Charles Daly
Llama/Firestorm
Norinco
Rock Island / Armscor
Taurus

Colt
Dan Wesson
Kimber
Para Ordnance
Sig Sauer
Smith&Wesson
Springfiled
STI

Ed Brown
Fusion Firearms
Les Baer
Nighthawk
Rock River Arms
Wilson Combat

Pending on what you want, there are MANY fine providers of 1911s out there, of this list the only one's I would suggest to totally stay away from are the Charles Daly models, the Llama/Firestorm or any "home brew" 1911 that you may come across unless you know a thing or two about 1911s, there are many home gun smiths that can make what looks like a great 1911 that may or may not be worth the money. To keep things simple, I'm not going into buying used, all the following info is based on the assumption that items being purchased are new in the box from a reputable dealer. So you want a 1911? What exactly do you want? Do you want a "Government" size all steel frame, or how about carbon steel, not stainless? Do you want a light weight frame? Compact? Sub-compact? Micro? There's a ton of different options out there regarding which size you even want and pending on what size and options you want will greatly influence the opinions given regarding what kind of 1911 you want or should buy. If you want a basic 1911 like your Grandpa use to carry in WWII, you don't go to Kimber, if you want a 4" bushing-less bbl, on a compact frame, you don't go to Colt. So looking at the list of manufactures above, and starting at tier 1, we'll go over some of the options.

1: Auto Ordnance
AO makes mainly GI model 1911s, and one Custom Stainless, that's not alot of options if you want a carry gun, as they are 5" guns, and if you don't want stainless, why invest in refinishing an Auto Ordnance? I have heard few complaints on the AO line and have had absolutely ZERO experience with them, most of the time they don't even get brought up when people ask for advice on which 1911 to buy, why this is I don't know, but if I recall correctly, I've only met one guy who carries one and he was very happy with it. But looking at the Custom Stainless with it's MSRP of $813, I'm not surprised that one would look elsewhere. My pick from AO would probably be a GI model, as there’s no way I’d pay the $700ish for the Custom AO, I’d rather have the GI and put about $300 into work and probably end up with a better gun than their custom, there’s just not enough value in the AO line to justify spending over $600 IMHO.

2: Rock Island Armory
These are probably the best low budget 1911s out there IMHO, but again I don't have one, but everyone that does have one seems to love it, they do come in more than one size, and they offer a GI style model, a Tactical Model with Novak or Novak style sights, an ambi-safety, and a nice beavertail, all for on average less than $550. They also offer a compact model. Alot of the misgivings about the RIA guns is that there is no "Company" website to view the models, the guns are associated with ArmsCor and some info can be found on the ArmsCor website listed above, oddly enough the most info on RIA guns I've found as been on M1911.org and the SARCO Inc. website, which unfortunately isn't working right at the moment, but usually they have a nice lay out where you can see some of the different RIA models. If I had only $500-$600 to spend and I wanted a 5" 1911 with some of the "needed" add-ons, the RIA Tactical would probably be the gun I would buy if I didn't want to buy a used gun, as the case is I managed to find an older, used, Springfield Loaded back when they still came with a blued finish for $450 and that was my first "Real" 1911. My pick from RIA would have to be the Rock Island Tactical, this puts you pretty close to a Springfield Loaded at a lower cost than the PT1911, all you need is some night sights and you have a damn good 1911.

3: Taurus Taurus began making 1911 models about 2 years ago, boasting that they gave all the great smith work that the highend gun makers charge you more for. Personally, I think that's a load of crap because all those options minus the checkering are almost standard on the center piece gun of the major players, you look at the Springfield Loaded models, the Kimber Pro Carry II or Custom II, the SIG GSR, or the S&W 1911s, and all those things are standard. It doesn't change the fact that Taurus' just cost less than any other major gun maker, if you compare a Beretta 92FS and a Taurus PT92, or a Taurus revolver and a S&W revolver and you'll see why there's a price difference, the same can be said of the PT1911. I'm not bashing the gun, I think it's great that there's a lower cost 1911 out there filling the gap between the bare bones GI models and the other 1911s out there, but it's not the end all, be all of the 1911 world that some make it out to be. It is what it is, a well priced 1911 that isn't quite as nicely fit or finished compared to the other guns, and the price is climbing on them. Think of it this way, if they are giving you all these options for free, how are they making a profit? The PT1911 currently only comes in 5" configurations, and a railed version is also available which you won't find on a Rock Island. At this time, the PT1911 is only available in .45ACP My pick for Taurus would have to be the Stainless Pt1911 as the blued finish reportedly doesn’t hold up for squat and I’d hate to have the gun refinished for almost half if not more than half of what I paid for the gun.
 

JD

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
75
Location
Central Iowa, USA
imported post

Part 3

4: Colt Call me crazy, but I'm just not impressed with Cot's current options from the factory, I find them to be too edgy, and not equipped with the same features that I can get on a similarly priced gun from the other major players. HOWEVER, if you're looking for a 1911 to take to the range, or just want a 1911 that won't loose value, or want something that you plan to have smithed to your liking, I would greatly advise getting a Colt Series 70 reproduction, if you plan on spending in the $1300+ range and want a 5" gun, the Colt Special Combat should be an item on your list of prospective purchases, after all Colt is the original maker, and they've been doing it a LONG time. If you’re looking for a base gun for custom work, you can’t beat the Series 70 reproduction guns. Colt has offerings in .38 Super, .45ACP and one the Delta Elite is reissued, 10mm. They have been previously offered in .40 and 9mm as well. My pick from Colt: XSE Combat Commander

5: Dan Wesson If you want a bobtail from the factory (most makers will consider hacking of a corner of the frame grounds to void a warranty, or so I would think) costing less than $1K, a Dan Wesson Classic Bobtail Commander is just the thing for you. I have not heard one complaint on a CBOB yet, and if I had an endless budget, I would buy one in a heart beat, but as it is I have several guns that fill the bill as a compact carry gun but if I were to want another commander sized 1911 for under $1k, this would most likely be it. Dan Wesson also offers several 5" guns in varying calibers, .45ACP, .40S&W, and 10mm My Pick from Dan Wesson: Dan Wesson Classic Commander Bobtail in .45ACP

6: Kimber
Here's where I catch a little hell every now and then. Kimbers are the guns that I hate to love, I want a Tactical Pro in 9mm, I want a TLE Pro RL in stainless, I want a CDP Pro, I want a Warrior, I want a Gold Combat RL...hell, I want one of them all. But I won't be buying another Kimber for a while if not ever, but that's subject for another blog. Kimber has a vast offering of different models in all manner of sizes and different calibers. Kimber does have a bit of an on-line history of having issues with QC and guns not functioning properly, and horror stories of customer service. I'm just stating the fact that such a history and opinions exist. There are literally thousands of people that have Kimbers that work 100% and never have an issue, and rant about great customer service. All I'm going to say is don't let the majority over ride the minority, take both sides into account before making your decision to buy. The one thing that did drive me nuts about our Kimbers is that for some reason the ends of the barrel near the muzzle had a tendency to rust, I’ve NEVER had that issue with any other 1911 including my Llama. If you get a Kimber and it runs 100% it’s hard to find a 1911 that you will like better. If it doesn’t run and you get a raw deal, don’t say I didn’t warn you. Kimber does have something that not all the makers offer, and that is a CCO sized gun offered in the Kimber compacts. That’s a 4” upper on a compact frame. Several calibers are available pending on exact package. My pick from Kimber: SIS Pro, as much as I hate the cocking serrations on this gun, I love the fact that it’s a steel framed 4” gun, does not have the series II firing pin safety, and has the other things I like having on a 1911, those being some nice wood grips, night sights and the 30lpi checkering.

7: Para Ordnance I've had 4 Para models, both single stack and double stack, some single actions, some Light Double Action models (LDA) I only have a few complaints on the Para family of pistols, one being that the Parakote finish on their pistols is not the equal of other "baked on" finishes, such as that of Kimber’s Kimpro finish. My other issue is that the double stack mags cost around $50.00 ea. However, if you want either of the following, a ramped barrel, a double stack hi-cap 1911, a single stack 1911, a double action only 1911, or a combination of the above, Para is the gun maker for you. I will also add that if you do go with a double stack 1911, that you get a good belt and a holster with off set mounting attachments to better offset the weight of the heavier gun. Para offers guns in .38 Super, 9mm, .40 and .45. My pick from Para: Tac 4 LDA, I hate the ParaKote finish, and 13+1 of .45ACP is nice thing to have, but as they only offer that in the “Carry” line of Paras, I’d remove the bobbed grip safety for an upswept model as the bobbed one was not comfortable for long periods of shooting.

8:Sig Sauer
Sig has been making fine guns for many a year, when the GSRs started hitting the line there were some issues that were accredited to a bad batch of either slides or frames, They have an impressive line up of 1911 models including 5" target guns, standard 5" guns, 4.25" Commander variants with an honest to goodness bushing barrel, compact guns with officer size frame and 4.25" bbls. The main issue with the Sig GSR line is that the countours of the slide that scream Sig, will not fit in most 1911 holsters, I have tried squeezing a GSR into my Galco Avenger OWB hoslter and it could be done provided I loosened up the tension scew, most holster makers that I've researched don't have a listing for GSRs speciffically, so if you go the GSR route, do your holster research beforehand, make some calls, send some emails and see what's what with the holster selection for a GSR. Sig is not offering the GSR in other calibers than .45ACP My pick from Sig: GSR Carry in black Nitron.

9: Smith&Wesson:
S&W came out with their 1911 line a few years ago and they have a pretty impressive line up, they are the only ones to my knowledge offering a scandium alloy framed 1911. Personally, I think the scandium framed guns will be too light for enjoyable prolonged shooting, but that's just a thought as I've never had one or fired one. My one gripe with S&W is that they do not offer a steel framed Commander sized gun. S&W 1911s are only available in .45ACP My pick from S&W: Gunsite Commander

10: Springfield Armory
: In my personal opinion, Springfield is the best option out of this category of 1911s and even has a good bit of overlap into the custom section with their custom shop guns, the "Professional" models from SA are extraordinary guns and I lust after them almost as much as I do for a NHC built to my specs. Springfield has different categories based on package options. GI: This is just your basic no frills 1911A1 pattern pistol, it has that GI look of your Grandpa’s issue pistol and generally sells in the $450 range on up. MILSPEC: Take your basic GI, and slant the cocking serrations, and beef up the sights a bit and this is what you get, it is available in stainless steel or a parkerized version. Loaded: The loaded line is a bread and butter 1911, it has everything that is general considered a must on the 1911, it has you're night sights, beaver tail grip safety, good fit and finish, and ambi safety. The Loaded comes in different sizes as does the above mentioned GI, the loaded can be found the following sizes: Loaded Full Size = 5" bbl, full frame Loaded Champion = 4" bushing-less bbl, full frame available in stainless steel, or two tone black over OD w/ alloy frame. Loaded Compact = 3.5" bushing-less bbl, compact frame, available in stainless only. Loaded Micro = 3" bbl, compact frame, two tone stainless over black alloy frame. Then you have you're Operators, which is Springfield’s name for their railed guns. These come in several variants and sizes. Springfield as has the TRP which is the top end of their guns without going to the custom shop. The 5" loaded can be found in 9mm, as well as the Springfield EMP which has been redesigned to work better with shorter cartridges, the EMP also comes in .40S&W IMHO, a Springfield Loaded in any configuration is the best "Starter 1911" out there, you're not spending over 1K for a loaded if you shop around, and if you decide that the 1911 is not for you, you have something with some retail value. My pick from Springfield Armory: Parkerized Loaded model.
 

JD

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
75
Location
Central Iowa, USA
imported post

Part 4
11: STI STI spans all three tiers, they have an excellent lower cost gun that is the STI Spartan, this gun offers alot of perks and only has an MSRP of $660, in the lower tier guns, this one is hard to beat, but as STI is mainly higher priced guns, not many first time buyers are familiar with it and may overlook it. It's features are listed as:
Crafted with classic 1911 design, the STI International Spartan is a traditional 1911 pistol with high-end standards at an affordable price. The Spartan is built on a steel, government length, standard width frame. The grip includes a checkered mainspring housing to provide a sure grip. The controls are an STI International single sided thumb safety and high-rise beavertail grip safety. The slide features traditional 1911 styling with front and rear cocking serrations, and the barrel is 5.0" with a match grade fitted bushing. This excellent firearm comes standard with an STI square hammer, patented STI trigger system, and STI sear and disconnector for smooth, reliable function. The Spartan has a Parkerized finish and is available in .45 ACP
STI has a great amount of mid to high tier guns as well such as the Lawman, Legacy, and Ranger II. STI also offers several double stack variants in varying calibers. My pick from STI: Ranger II or Tactical 4.15

That pretty much sums of the first two tiers of 1911s, I'm not going to go into much detail on the third tier, as generally speaking, you're looking at a minimum of $1200 on up. These are your custom makers, they turn out less guns than the big players listed above, but what they turn out is usually grade A awesomeness and perfection. Generally, you can call them and get what ever you want on the gun with not too much of fuss, before we purchased Lima’s Wilson, we were looking into a Nighthawk Custom, she called them up and basically any change she wanted they were willing to do. I will go on about Fusion Firearms as they are relatively new and taking the 1911 world by storm, I don’t frequent the 1911 forums as much as I did as we don’t have the budget that we used to and seeing all those fine guns kills us…any way. Fusion Firearms is run by Bob Serva former owner of Dan Wesson, they are turning out some fantastic guns at prices lower than the other makers in the third tier. Currently, the word is to buy one now before prices go up. From what I’ve been reading they are worth every penny and those that have them seem to like them. Regarding the high end guns, I’m not saying that you should rule these out due to price, but $1200 is a big chunk of change, if you are buying your first 1911 and you have the money, buy whatever you want, we have 1911s from Les Baer and Wilson, and while I can tell the difference in fit and finish between them and the 1911s I’ve either got in the safe or have had and sold, the guns themselves do not make me a better shooter, we have those guns because we love 1911s and we could afford them at the time. I took my Colt XSE along to a two day class with Insights Training and my groups did not magically get better when I was shooting my Baer, or vice a versa. I’m not saying that a better quality gun doesn’t shoot better than a lower quality gun, I;’m just saying that I’m not a good enough shooter to make the gun perform to it’s maximum performance level. If I were to take my Baer and Springfield to a range using a ransom rest, I think I’d see a difference, maybe one of these days I’ll get the chance to test that theory. Well, that’s pretty much it, there are a lot of 1911 makers out there, and some are better than others. Regarding which one should you buy, that’s all up to you. Each maker and model can have it’s positives and negatives. Two guns from each maker can run totally different, and the $450 used Springfield I have can run just as good as the $1300 used Les Baer that I have, it all depends on the EXACT gun in question, I do think you can cut potential head aches by staying in the mid tier, but that’s just my opinion. One thing I did not go into detail about is warranty, before you buy check out the warranty program of the manufacturer in question, something just bothers me about a maker that doesn’t warranty their work for the life of the gun.
 

cREbralFIX

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
378
Location
, ,
imported post

Colt...just make sure you inspect the gun first.

Check out the 1911forum.com/forums.

You may want to look at Dan Wesson (cz-usa.com). They have some excellent values going right now.

A friend of mine reports good results with two S&W 1911's (60k+ rounds through them). He did have some issues at the beginning, but S&W took care of him.
 

Chaingun81

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
581
Location
Centreville, Virginia, USA
imported post

Thaks for so much input guys - really a lot of info and food for thought! I was at my local gun store today and was basically told to forget about both Springfields (zero avaliablility) and Taurus (bad quality). When i asked the manager there the same question - which 1911is priced under $800 and hasreally good quality and reliability record and readily avaliable, he toldme to geta Kimber Custom IIor Pro Carry II. Seems like a nice option - i just never knew that there are Kimbers for this price range out there - i thought that everything that Kimber makes is 1000+ guns. Does anyone have any first handexperience with those?
 

.40 Cal

State Researcher
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
1,379
Location
COTEP FOREVER!, North Carolina, USA
imported post

Loaded question (pun intended :p). Kimber has good and bad models, just like any manufacturer. There was a time that Kimber tried to implement an external extractor (like on the sig 1911 and S&W) that produced many ftf issues. Overall, their fit and finish tends to be much better than a Rock Island's (at twice the price, it should be), but the reliability and end result tends to be the same.Keep in mind there are a lot of options for 1911's. Shoot deferent onesif you can so that you can determine what you need to have on yours. Don't pay for crap that someone else decided was a must have. For example, of my favoriteguns is my Springfield Mil-Spec in stainless steel. It is bone stock and perfect! Ambi safeties mean jack squat to me since
I'm a right handed shooter,full length guide rods are more of a pain in the ass for field stripping than any help incontrollingmuzzle flipand front cocking serrations are just a cosmetic feature that offers no shoot-ability value (though they been great at eating up my leather holsters :banghead:). A beaver tail, good trigger job and lowered and flared ejection are items that would be much better additions than the afore mentioned, but may not be necessary to you. Best would be to get a stock RIA, master it and then buy the upgraded 1911 with the bells and whistles you choose. I promise you'll go back to that Rock Island more often than you think.

Just my .40
 

45-ACP

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
130
Location
PhenixCity, Alabama, USA
imported post

taurus bad quality? did the guy even stock taurus?

I don't know where he got his information but taurus is not a bad quality product now days.

I stake my life on mine evey day
 

RaidersRule

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2008
Messages
23
Location
Lubbock, Texas, USA
imported post

I bought a .45 ACP Springfield GI version mil-spec. It's awesome. I own a Sig P2022 and a Glock 26, I think that the .45 is easier to shoot with a significant less amount of noticable recoil. I know how crazy that sounds, but I really felt that way.
 

Chaingun81

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
581
Location
Centreville, Virginia, USA
imported post

45-ACP wrote:
taurus bad quality? did the guy even stock taurus?

I don't know where he got his information but taurus is not a bad quality product now days.

I stake my life on mine evey day

What he meant about Taurus is more incosistant quality. Some of them are great and some are crappy - it's really a question of luck which one you gonna end up with. And quality remark was specifically related to their1911 - same guy said that their revolvers are fine guns for a great price.

Anyhow, any other opinions on Kimbers?
 
Top