Man arrested trying to check into hotel in denver for carrying his gun case on a hunting trip

DENVER—House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was briefly evacuated from her downtown Denver hotel on Saturday when a man carrying two hunting rifles and two pistols tried to check in to the hotel.

Secret Service spokesman Malcolm Wiley said 29-year-old Joseph Calanchini of Pinedale, Wyo., faces a charge of unlawful carrying of a weapon after police officers at the Grand Hyatt hotel noticed him carrying a rifle-type case while checking in. Calanchini did not have a concealed weapons permit, said Lance Clem, spokesman for the Colorado Department of Public Safety.
Wiley said authorities were not releasing information about whether the weapons were loaded because the case remained under investigation. Wiley said the charge is the same whether the weapons were loaded or unloaded.
Pelosi and other guests briefly evacuated the hotel but were never in danger, Pelosi spokesman Brendan Daly said.
Calanchini told KUSA-TV it was bad timing.
"I didn't even know the DNC was in town. I don't watch the news," Calanchini told the station from jail before he was released on $10,000 bond. "If I had known, I would have done things differently. It was a simple mistake."
Calanchini told KUSA he had the weapons because he was getting ready for a hunting trip Aug. 28.
Authorities were investigating a report that Calanchini was in town on business and had had the weapons worked upon, including mounting of site scopes, to prepare for the trip.
"The speaker was never in any danger and she appreciates the quick and professional response of the police," said Daly.

Click to expand...

Hopefully the follow up story will be about this guy sueing Denver back into the stone age.

Click to expand...

thorvaldr wrote:

Hopefully the follow up story will be about this guy sueing Denver back into the stone age.

Click to expand...

I hope a good lawyer finds out about this and contacts him, sounds from here like he's taking their word for it that he is in the wrong.

Click to expand...

It always amazes me that just 'because' a politician is involved, somehow the laws change.



It isn't against the law to have empty (or even loaded) firearms in a locked case. It isn't 'carrying concealed' to have empty handguns in a locked suitcase. It isn't against the law to carry these cases in your motor vehicle...or carry them into a hotel.



It isn't against the law to come into a hotel to register for a room without having a reservation.



Seems like the only laws broken in this whole event were civil rights laws broken by the Denver police.

Click to expand...

Denver's controversial gun laws will remain in effect thanks to a divided Colorado Supreme Court that upheld the ordinances on a 3-3 vote.
The tie vote means a lower court ruling upholding Denver's laws will stand.

But the tie vote failed to give the state, cities and gun groups what they wanted most - a clear ruling from the state high court on whether uniform state law overrides local gun ordinances passed by home-rule cities such as Denver.

"It makes a good law in Denver but leaves unresolved how these issues are dealt with elsewhere," said Assistant City Attorney David Broadwell.

"We were hopeful we would get a definitive ruling one way or the other," he said, noting that a number of Denver ordinances regulating a variety of firearms were at issue. "Although it's a relatively favorable ruling for the city, we now have to analyze the situation and figure out where we go from here."

Among the issues, Broadwell said, is when to resume enforcement of Denver's laws that have been in hiatus during the court case.

The legal battle began when state lawmakers passed legislation in 2003 that barred cities such as Denver from enacting ordinances more restrictive than state law. The idea was to bring uniformity to the variety of local gun laws across the state.

Denver, which has some of the strictest firearm laws in the metro area, challenged the state legislation as a violation of its authority as a home-rule city.

Two Denver district judges ruled that while the state legislation overrode some ordinances, Denver still had the right to regulate assault weapons, so-called "Saturday night specials" and the open carrying of firearms in public.

Denver District Judge Joseph E. Meyer ruled in 2004 that Denver's dense population and violent crime rate outweighed the state's need for uniformity in gun laws.

Although the Supreme Court's tie vote upheld the lower court ruling, Colorado still has no clear direction from the court on when or whether home-rule cities can enact gun ordinances that override state statues.

The unusual tie vote resulted when newly appointed Justice Allison Eid, a former Colorado solicitor general, abstained because she argued the case on behalf of the state when she worked for the attorney general's office.

Spokeswoman Kristin Hubbell said the attorney general's office will not appeal the ruling further.

"We were obviously hopeful the court would agree on the arguments we made," she said.

"Overall, we're glad that statewide concealed carry is still in place," she said, referring to uniform statewide criteria established for issuing concealed carry permits under a law passed in 2003. "I think that today's ruling may leave issues that have yet to be resolved."

Broadwell agreed.

"We filed the case to have the courts provide clarity and certainty," he said. "We had hoped we would get a more definitive ruling on these issues so we would know where we stand in the state. We hoped the court would rule in a way that would become the law of the land one way or the other. We didn't achieve that."

He said he expects further challenges to the laws in Denver or other municipalities.

A challenge on a more narrow issue could result in a different vote, Broadwell said.

In Monday's rulings, Justices Mary Mullarkey, Alex Martinez and Gregory Hobbs voted to uphold the rulings of the Denver judges. Justices Michael Bender, Nancy Rice and Ben Coats said the decisions should be overturned.

It is unclear whether Eid will have to continue to abstain from any new cases involving the issue.

Attorney Anne Gill, who represented Aurora Gun Club member John Sternberg in his challenge to Denver's gun laws, said they are evaluating what to do next.

"Our reaction is deep disappointment that we didn't get a ruling out of it," Gill said. "Mr. Sternberg basically wants to have clarification on the state law, and we are hoping that the ultimate ruling is that uniform state law will prevail. We are trying to figure out how to get to that point."

Tony Fabian, president of the Colorado State Shooting Association, said his group and National Rifle Association experts are evaluating the situation to decide what to do next.

"We're just disappointed," he said. "The court was unable to give us a final opinion on the law in this area and leaves this issue up in the air. We're left waiting and wondering what is the law when it comes to this matter."

Denver gun laws that remain in effect

• Assault weapons: A ban on assault weapons and cheap Saturday-night specials.

• In public: A ban on openly carrying firearms in public.

• Storage: Safe storage of all firearms required.

Click to expand...

Whatever happen to this case?

Click to expand...

Rattrapper wrote:

Whatever happen to this case?

Click to expand...

Found at http://www.tom-hanna.org/?p=1522 using google. If he hasn't found a lawyer by now chances are he doesn't intend to:

#20. Joe Calanchini
7 months and 18 days ago
The case was dismissed today. Thanx for all the support everyone. Now it's just the challenge of getting my personal property back.
#21. Joe Calanchini
7 months and 18 days ago
Still haven't received my property back including my guns. It seems that the DPD is doing everything that can to make this more difficult for me. Charges were never filed, the arrest is on my record, and the only way to get my property back is by a judges/DA's order. Then it has to go to the investigating officer for him to ok the release. The officer is working the 4 pm to 12:00 am shift, so timing is terrible. I never even received a reciept for the stuff that was taken out of my truck. I have a good idea of what was in there, but no official list of what they took.
#22. Joe Calanchini
1 month and 7 days ago
Just incase anyone is interested on the latest on my case. The Denver Police and other agencies that searched my truck were able to steal quite a bit of personal belongings. I pod, radar detector and grandfathers ring from WWII just to name a few items. I did finaly get my rifles and pistols back from the DPD after about 2 months. I contacted the ACLU about going after the DPD to get either my stuff from my truck back or replacement value. They turned down my case saying that due to their high work load and low funding they don't have the resources to pursue my case. I guess that the protestors from the DNC are taking up the most of their time. So as is stands now I did get my guns back, had my truck robbed by law enforcement and have an arrest for unlawful carrying of firearms on my record.

Click to expand...