MetalChris
Regular Member
imported post
tarzan1888 wrote:
Mike...John?
tarzan1888 wrote:
How about killing the troll.
Mike...John?
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Our new VP?
- Thread starter ed
- Start date
XD-GEM
Campaign Veteran
imported post
TheMrMitch wrote:
Very likely true. As I said on the other version of this thread, we now have a Liberal-Liberal ticket versus a Moderate-Conservative ticket. The Moderate-conservative will win this one.
And as gun enthusiasts, who can resist an "M & P" ticket?
TheMrMitch wrote:
McCain just cinched the presidency with his VP choice.
Very likely true. As I said on the other version of this thread, we now have a Liberal-Liberal ticket versus a Moderate-Conservative ticket. The Moderate-conservative will win this one.
And as gun enthusiasts, who can resist an "M & P" ticket?
Dustin
Regular Member
imported post
DreQo wrote:
I'll add that my family follows the Bible as close as we can. This too is against women leading men in the setting of the Presidency.
ANY FURTHER discussion you'd like to have on this issue can be donebelow,
http://p-o-o-p.org/
I will leave this though. Do I think that there are women who would be far better leaders than some of those punks in suit in the White House. YES I DO. I just believe it is not their responsibility. Same with the Military/Infantry.
DreQo wrote:
To be simple, I'll quote my wife.
I'll add that my family follows the Bible as close as we can. This too is against women leading men in the setting of the Presidency.
ANY FURTHER discussion you'd like to have on this issue can be donebelow,
http://p-o-o-p.org/
I will leave this though. Do I think that there are women who would be far better leaders than some of those punks in suit in the White House. YES I DO. I just believe it is not their responsibility. Same with the Military/Infantry.
MetalChris
Regular Member
imported post
Dustin wrote:
I've been out of the church "scene" for over 8 years now though so I'm a little rusty.
Dustin wrote:
Interesting...I've never heard this interpretation before. From what I understand (depending on what Scripture you're basing this on) women are not to be in leadership positions in the church.
I've been out of the church "scene" for over 8 years now though so I'm a little rusty.
Dustin
Regular Member
imported post
MetalChris wrote:
Like I said, if someone feels the need to challenge my own personal views, they can do so here - http://p-o-o-p.org/
Just create a topic.
MetalChris wrote:
Like I said, if someone feels the need to challenge my own personal views, they can do so here - http://p-o-o-p.org/
Just create a topic.
rodbender
Regular Member
imported post
MetalChris wrote:
MetalChris wrote:
You're right MetalChris, All it refers to is leadership positions over men in the church. I'll look it up and post it later.Dustin wrote:Interesting...I've never heard this interpretation before. From what I understand (depending on what Scripture you're basing this on) women are not to be in leadership positions in the church.
I've been out of the church "scene" for over 8 years now though so I'm a little rusty.
unreconstructed1
Regular Member
imported post
they may have actually suckered me into voting republican with this one...
they may have actually suckered me into voting republican with this one...
Dustin
Regular Member
imported post
rodbender wrote:
Eitherway, like I said, I'd be more than willing to debate this on the site i've mentioned earlier.
My wife's got some interesting points on the issue as well.
rodbender wrote:
Why do you guys insist on going OFF TOPIC ?MetalChris wrote:You're right MetalChris, All it refers to is leadership positions over men in the church. I'll look it up and post it later.Dustin wrote:Interesting...I've never heard this interpretation before. From what I understand (depending on what Scripture you're basing this on) women are not to be in leadership positions in the church.
I've been out of the church "scene" for over 8 years now though so I'm a little rusty.
Eitherway, like I said, I'd be more than willing to debate this on the site i've mentioned earlier.
My wife's got some interesting points on the issue as well.
rodbender
Regular Member
imported post
Dustin wrote:
Dustin wrote:
As for me, I'm on enough forums already and don't want to join another.rodbender wrote:Why do you guys insist on going OFF TOPIC ?MetalChris wrote:You're right MetalChris, All it refers to is leadership positions over men in the church. I'll look it up and post it later.Dustin wrote:Interesting...I've never heard this interpretation before. From what I understand (depending on what Scripture you're basing this on) women are not to be in leadership positions in the church.
I've been out of the church "scene" for over 8 years now though so I'm a little rusty.
Eitherway, like I said, I'd be more than willing to debate this on the site i've mentioned earlier.
My wife's got some interesting points on the issue as well.
imported post
Dustin wrote:
Dustin wrote:
It's NOT off topic. The topic of the thread is the woman whom McCain choose for the vice presidential candidate. It would be natural to discuss our opinions on whether she would fill the position well. If her gender influences someone's decision, then we should most definitely discuss it.
KBCraig
Regular Member
imported post
TipsyMcStagger wrote:
TipsyMcStagger wrote:
Sadly, the electoral college was forsake for mobocracy when we switched to the direct election of senators.
Dustin
Regular Member
imported post
DreQo wrote:
Here's the following Criteria for this thread.
Use this topic to discuss issues regarding the ongoing fight to preserve the right to keep and bear arms.
Can you show me how religion will fit into this ?
Eitherway, I've given my answer.
DreQo wrote:
Here's the following Criteria for this thread.
Use this topic to discuss issues regarding the ongoing fight to preserve the right to keep and bear arms.
Can you show me how religion will fit into this ?
Eitherway, I've given my answer.
deepdiver
Campaign Veteran
imported post
KBCraig wrote:
I do agree however that 17th Amendment was a bad idea and should have long ago been repealed.
KBCraig wrote:
Senators were never elected by the electoral college. Per Article 1, Section 3 of the Constitution, "The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each state, chosen by the legislature thereof, for six years; and each Seantor shall have one vote." In 1913 the 17th Amendment changed "chosen by the legislature thereof" to "elected by the people thereof".
I do agree however that 17th Amendment was a bad idea and should have long ago been repealed.
imported post
Looks like a few Dems are going to be voting for Palin / McCain...
http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=26197
McCain / Palin looks like a winning combination to protect and restore our 2A rights Alaska style!
Looks like a few Dems are going to be voting for Palin / McCain...
http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=26197
McCain / Palin looks like a winning combination to protect and restore our 2A rights Alaska style!
Dustin
Regular Member
imported post
jdoe wrote:
Is it alaska that doesn't charge for CC ?
jdoe wrote:
Is it alaska that doesn't charge for CC ?
Doug Huffman
Banned
imported post
deepdiver wrote:
The popular election of U.S. Senators is a major step in the rule of the demos, the vulgar masses (the definition of demos). Democracy is the rule of fools by fools.
deepdiver wrote:
Hear hear!
The popular election of U.S. Senators is a major step in the rule of the demos, the vulgar masses (the definition of demos). Democracy is the rule of fools by fools.
Deanimator
Regular Member
imported post
The Democrats are so scared of her, they're peeing themselves. Even the official Obama campaign reaction was so shrill that "The One" himself had to personally retract it. Last night on CNN, Jack Cafferty was so hysterical, he was the spitting image of "Baghdad Bob", railing incoherently about how her appointment was a "joke". Well gee, Jack, if it were such a "joke", why aren't you WELCOMING it the way a lot of McCain voters welcomed Biden? Obama was caught totally flat-footed and even his most servile fawning sycophants know it.
Predictions:
1. The Daily KOS people are barely one step up from NAMBLA and the Aryan Nations. If some of them haven't already, some of them WILL mock her Down's Syndrome kid. It's just not in them NOT to. If McCain has two braincells to rub together he'll be watching for that stuff like a hawk and rub Obama's nose in it at EVERY opportunity. O'Reilly's already got a grudge against the KOS and Huffington Post. The second anything like that appears, you can bet he'll make sure MILLIONS of people know about it.
2. Biden is an ass, PERIOD. He can no more NOT try to bully Palin than Rosie O'Donnell can not be morbidly obese and psychotic. THAT will sure win over a lot of female voters for Obama...
3. Palin's an NRA life member. Biden's a malicious, fanatical anti-gunner. Let's see, WHICH ticket are Ohio gun owners more likely to vote for...? Obama probably lost enough Ohio gun owners by picking Biden to lose the election. McCain picking Palin only made things worse for Obama.
The Democrats are so scared of her, they're peeing themselves. Even the official Obama campaign reaction was so shrill that "The One" himself had to personally retract it. Last night on CNN, Jack Cafferty was so hysterical, he was the spitting image of "Baghdad Bob", railing incoherently about how her appointment was a "joke". Well gee, Jack, if it were such a "joke", why aren't you WELCOMING it the way a lot of McCain voters welcomed Biden? Obama was caught totally flat-footed and even his most servile fawning sycophants know it.
Predictions:
1. The Daily KOS people are barely one step up from NAMBLA and the Aryan Nations. If some of them haven't already, some of them WILL mock her Down's Syndrome kid. It's just not in them NOT to. If McCain has two braincells to rub together he'll be watching for that stuff like a hawk and rub Obama's nose in it at EVERY opportunity. O'Reilly's already got a grudge against the KOS and Huffington Post. The second anything like that appears, you can bet he'll make sure MILLIONS of people know about it.
2. Biden is an ass, PERIOD. He can no more NOT try to bully Palin than Rosie O'Donnell can not be morbidly obese and psychotic. THAT will sure win over a lot of female voters for Obama...
3. Palin's an NRA life member. Biden's a malicious, fanatical anti-gunner. Let's see, WHICH ticket are Ohio gun owners more likely to vote for...? Obama probably lost enough Ohio gun owners by picking Biden to lose the election. McCain picking Palin only made things worse for Obama.
MetalChris
Regular Member
imported post
DreQo wrote:
DreQo wrote:
Besides, you're (dustin) the one that went off topic in the first place.
Nelson_Muntz
Campaign Veteran
imported post
Wow. The next VP is quite the datable picture of womanhood! (sorry, don't know how to insert a picture)
http://kodiakkonfidential.blogspot.com/2007/12/sarah-in-vogue.html
ETC: Edited for the PC Police, although, like Jimmuh, they are likewise "lusting in their hearts"
Wow. The next VP is quite the datable picture of womanhood! (sorry, don't know how to insert a picture)
http://kodiakkonfidential.blogspot.com/2007/12/sarah-in-vogue.html
ETC: Edited for the PC Police, although, like Jimmuh, they are likewise "lusting in their hearts"