Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: [Article] Washington Gun Ownership to Go Through One Man

  1. #1
    Founder's Club Member - Moderator longwatch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Northern Fauquier Co, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    4,297

    Post imported post

    Washington Gun Ownership to Go Through One Man
    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/01/wa...ns.html?ref=us

    By WILL BARDENWERPER Published: August 31, 2008 WASHINGTON — Residents here who buy a gun to keep legally at home, now that the Supreme Court has overturned the city’s ban on handguns, will find that a bureaucratic maze leads them to an unmarked door on Good Hope Road Southeast where Charles W. Sykes Jr. does business.
    Mr. Sykes does not sell guns, but on Tuesday he is expected to become the only federally licensed dealer in Washington to serve as the transfer agent for the carefully controlled transactions that will put guns in the hands of district residents.
    There are no gun stores here, and a resident who buys a gun elsewhere must have the weapon shipped to a licensed dealer in the district. Mr. Sykes’s permit will allow him to receive the weapon and, for a transaction fee of $125, he will ensure that the requisite paperwork is prepared for approval by federal and district officials before handing over the weapon to its new owner.
    Mr. Sykes has been handling this kind of transaction since 1994 for security firms, police officers and the like. His enterprise, CS Exchange Limited and located in the southeast Washington neighborhood of Anacostia, is not listed in the telephone book, and he does not advertise. But his name is commonly known in local gun circles, and he can be found on the Internet.
    Mr. Sykes said his firearms work was a sideline — he would not name his full-time employer — and he had no thoughts of selling guns.
    “I don’t know of any firearms dealer in the greater metropolitan area that hasn’t been broken into,” he said. “I don’t want the headache of having to secure a stockpile of weapons.”
    There may be a few other holders of federal firearms licenses in the city, but according to the police, he will soon be the only one to offer this service.
    There was a surge of people contacting him after the Supreme Court’s ruling, but Mr. Sykes said some people had lost interest upon learning how long it was taking him to receive the necessary approval. As of Tuesday, however, if all goes according to plan, a resident of the District of Columbia who purchases a gun should expect to receive the weapon within three weeks of purchase.
    Mr. Sykes relocated his business in February; the new location was certified by the federal firearms agency in July. He applied for an annual license from the District Police Department, and that is the license he should receive Tuesday, said Traci Hughes, a police spokeswoman.
    At that point, prospective new gun owners will for the first time be able to obtain weapons from out of state and have them duly licensed in the district.
    Mr. Sykes said that so far only about 10 district residents had approached him for the transfer of newly purchased weapons. Still, there are indications that business may pick up eventually.
    Dale Metta, the manager of Atlantic Guns in nearby Silver Spring, Md., said he had received “lots of interest from D.C. residents, but the problem has been that Mr. Sykes was not yet ready for business.”
    Mr. Metta said in the weeks after the Supreme Court’s ruling he received at least 10 visits a day from Washington residents interested in buying a gun.
    Also, the District Police Department has provided 412 firearms applications to the public, Ms. Hughes said.
    Mr. Sykes, meanwhile, is counseling patience. “You’ve waited for 33 years,” he said. “What is another month or two?”




  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Granite State of Mind
    Posts
    4,508

    Post imported post

    longwatch wrote:
    Mr. Sykes’s permit will allow him to receive the weapon and, for a transaction fee of $125
    :shock::shock::shock::shock:



    Holy guacamole, Batman!

    I know some FFLs charge up to $50; my local guy charges $10, but $25 is probably common. But a hunnert-an-twenny-five smackers just to receive a package and do about five minutes worth of paperwork? Jeezey creezey!



  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Huntsville, Alabama, USA
    Posts
    255

    Post imported post

    Simple economics of supply and demand until Congress passes a bill that allows DC residents to purchase handguns in VA and MD...

  4. #4
    Founder's Club Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    DFW, Texas, USA
    Posts
    429

    Post imported post

    My first response is to ask, why on earth would the good citizens of D.C. put up with this bureaucratic nonsense? But I'm from Texas and the truth is the good citizens of the great state have allowed the unlawful prohibition of open carry of arms for over a century. So I must accept some of my own indignation.

    My thoughts, prayers and gun rights activism are with you citizens of D.C. Best wishes for the future. May we all walk in a free state.

  5. #5
    Centurion
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ellis County, Texas, USA
    Posts
    275

    Post imported post

    cccook wrote:
    My first response is to ask, why on earth would the good citizens of D.C. put up with this bureaucratic nonsense? But I'm from Texas and the truth is the good citizens of the great state have allowed the unlawful prohibition of open carry of arms for over a century. So I must accept some of my own indignation.

    My thoughts, prayers and gun rights activism are with you citizens of D.C. Best wishes for the future. May we all walk in a free state.
    And the prohibition of concealed carry for nearly the same century plus. Yes, it is truly shocking how bad the state of affairs has been in Texas for handguns. If it weren't for the traveling provision that let rural folks carry (because the country LEOs used good judgement and discretion and/or the ole boy "I know Charlie; he's meant no harm") while empowering city police to keep the reins tight in urban areas it might have been changed long ago. In that sense, Texas was very "may carry": if you lived in the right place, kept it quite, and knew the right people, you were OK. If not, so sorry. Sounds like the PRNJ, no?

    We even had a Connecticut-style ("we don't care what the law says [or doesn't say], keep it concealed or ELSE") bureaucrat-knows-best situation with DAs/CAs over car carry. It wouldn't surprise me if even today some are ringing people up for UCW though the Legislature has CLEARLY (this time) expressed its will. They are certainly doing so on banning CHL holders from entire building simply because a court or court office occupies one part of it. That will very likely change this session however. More on that later.

  6. #6
    Regular Member Sonora Rebel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Gone
    Posts
    3,958

    Post imported post

    Washington DCCity Government should recieve a visit by Federal Marshalls and the lot of them arrested for blatantConstiutional violations and deprivation of citizens rights. This is the only way this continued tryanny will end.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Cincy area, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    888

    Post imported post

    Sonora Rebel, for some reason the thought of RICO statute violations crossed my mind in regards to that article.

  8. #8
    Regular Member Sonora Rebel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Gone
    Posts
    3,958

    Post imported post

    RICO might fit... So would a rope. Whatever works.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •