Palouse
Regular Member
imported post
I have a USP 40, and I found the stock, 14 lb. hammer spring to be too stiff, so I replaced it with a Wolff 10 lb. hammer spring. The result is the double-action pull is much smoother, and I can stay on target much easier. I carry decocked and safety off.
I've read about courts finding fault in SD situations where people have modified their pistol. Does anyone know of any case law here in WA that in some way addresses the stock v. modified issue?
I have a USP 40, and I found the stock, 14 lb. hammer spring to be too stiff, so I replaced it with a Wolff 10 lb. hammer spring. The result is the double-action pull is much smoother, and I can stay on target much easier. I carry decocked and safety off.
I've read about courts finding fault in SD situations where people have modified their pistol. Does anyone know of any case law here in WA that in some way addresses the stock v. modified issue?