Seigi
Regular Member
imported post
What part of "boycott" don't you understand?
The legality and morality of a party controlling who is allowed onto their own private property does not preclude the legality or morality of a second party attempting to convince the first to change their stance through civil dialogue, boycott, or requests for clarification of policy.
It also does not preclude us from forming, and expressing, opinions regarding the merit, or lack thereof, of their policy.
What part of "boycott" don't you understand?
The legality and morality of a party controlling who is allowed onto their own private property does not preclude the legality or morality of a second party attempting to convince the first to change their stance through civil dialogue, boycott, or requests for clarification of policy.
It also does not preclude us from forming, and expressing, opinions regarding the merit, or lack thereof, of their policy.