codename_47
Regular Member
imported post
I am still kinda at a loss as to why you are surprised by all this.
What I'm afraid of is CPRB will say "there is nothing unlawful being done here since open carry is illegal".
And? So what. The CPRB is not a legislative agency, nor are they a court of law. They don't make laws or interpret them.
No matter what happens, the officers involved will be vindicated by their own fellow officers.
I don't want unlawful behavior to go unrecognized. I will solve this.
I got a solution for ya: 42 usc 1983. Complaints about that statute don't go to the CPRB, though.
If you are serious, why don't you contact the city attorney, tell them that you have a 1983 lawsuit typed up and tell them that you just need one stupid officer to make an example out of, unless of course they want to properly train their officers on open carrying being illegal.
You can't MAKE them follow the law, all you can do is punish them when they don't.
I am still kinda at a loss as to why you are surprised by all this.
What I'm afraid of is CPRB will say "there is nothing unlawful being done here since open carry is illegal".
And? So what. The CPRB is not a legislative agency, nor are they a court of law. They don't make laws or interpret them.
No matter what happens, the officers involved will be vindicated by their own fellow officers.
I don't want unlawful behavior to go unrecognized. I will solve this.
I got a solution for ya: 42 usc 1983. Complaints about that statute don't go to the CPRB, though.
If you are serious, why don't you contact the city attorney, tell them that you have a 1983 lawsuit typed up and tell them that you just need one stupid officer to make an example out of, unless of course they want to properly train their officers on open carrying being illegal.
You can't MAKE them follow the law, all you can do is punish them when they don't.
