• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Asked to leave Greenbrier Mall for OC

vtme_grad98

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2006
Messages
385
Location
Virginia Beach, VA, ,
imported post

I hadn't been bothered for open carry for quite a while, so I guess I was due.

For those that don't know me, I'm a pretty clean cut guy, to the point of frequently being mistaken for law enforcement or military, even when not armed. At the time, I was wearing a pair of a jeans and a VT t-shirt.

I entered the mall through Sears, did a little tool browsing, and then decided to check out a couple of other shops before loading up with toys to go with my air compressor. As I was leaving Sears, a security guard happened to be coming down the escalator to my right. Shortly after that, I hear from behind me.

"Sir, excuse me sir. Are you on the job?"

The puzzled look on my face and "uh, on the job?" response made it pretty clear to him that I'm not a cop, at which point he informed me that the mall had a "no guns" policy and that I'd have to leave. Before actually leaving, I took a minute to talk to the guard and the woman at the information desk to find out who I need to contact to complain about the policy. I did enjoy hearing the woman there stating that she and her husband both have CHPs, and that her preference would be to have a number of people like me in the mall, in case something were to happen.

I'm still putting together my email to the head of mall security, and I'll post their response once I get it.

This has made me feel a little more motivated to get a voice recorder, though not for the typical reason. Despite my best efforts to make it obvious that I wasn't arguing about the legality of the mall policy, and that I just wanted to know who to complain to about their policy, it seemed like they weren't perceiving my comments the way I intended. I definitely need to record things like this so I can listen back later to see if I sound more confrontational than I realize.
 

LEO 229

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Messages
7,606
Location
USA
imported post

No real reason to capture this conversation unless the mall does NOT have such a policy.

I think we can all bet that since many malls do... this one does too.

You can let them know that the gang bangers are going to enter the mall with concealed guns. They are not going to follow that policy andthe mall will never know about it.

So what is the point in the policy?

I can assure you that it is not because they are robbed or have so many accidental discharges.

They have customers the do not like guns and feel safe knowing that guns are prohibited and are "magically" removed from everyone that walks in the mall.

Those customers spend money and that is what is all comes down to.
 

Thundar

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Messages
4,946
Location
Newport News, Virginia, USA
imported post

I have never had a problem in Sears.Sears does not have a policy posted. The mall cops are very uptight. They got upset with me last year for open carrying around Santa Claus. They got mad when I told them Santa was going to bring them coal for Christmas if they did not behave.
 

Phssthpok

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
1,026
Location
, ,
imported post

LEO 229 wrote:
No real reason to capture this conversation unless the mall does NOT have such a policy.
I've held my tongue many times before when confronted with your obvious bias and pot-stirring, but this takes the cake.

Do you even read what people are posting or do you just skim the words until you can lock onto a key word or phrase that you can twist into something that it isn't?

This has made me feel a little more motivated to get a voice recorder, though not for the typical reason. Despite my best efforts to make it obvious that I wasn't arguing about the legality of the mall policy, and that I just wanted to know who to complain to about their policy, it seemed like they weren't perceiving my comments the way I intended. I definitely need to record things like this so I can listen back later to see if I sound more confrontational than I realize.

The intention here is self-critique of ones interpersonal relation skills....apparently in an effort to IMPROVE THE IMAGE ONE PRESENTS TO THE PUBLIC WHEN CONFRONTED. Seems commendable to me.

How is this NOT a 'real reason'?:banghead:
 

VCDL President

Centurion
Joined
Jun 22, 2006
Messages
600
Location
Midlothian, Virginia, USA
imported post

I have recommended for some time that when carrying on private property, except restaurants that serve alcohol, to conceal carry if you have a CHP.

Public property is different.

Private property can ban guns at will and the worst track records with 'no guns' bans are at large malls and movie theaters.

What we don't want is to goad malls and movie theaters into posting, which would affect everyone - even those who concealed carry. Better to let them have their private, unwritten policies and to once in a while ask an open carrier to leave, than to post.
 

Chkultr

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
236
Location
Virginia Beach, Virginia, USA
imported post

Thundar wrote:
I have never had a problem in Sears.Sears does not have a policy posted. The mall cops are very uptight. They got upset with me last year for open carrying around Santa Claus. They got mad when I told them Santa was going to bring them coal for Christmas if they did not behave.
:D:lol::cool::p:celebrate:monkey:quirky:);):dude:
 

LEO 229

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Messages
7,606
Location
USA
imported post

Phssthpok wrote:
LEO 229 wrote:
No real reason to capture this conversation unless the mall does NOT have such a policy.
I've held my tongue many times before when confronted with your obvious bias and pot-stirring, but this takes the cake.

Do you even read what people are posting or do you just skim the words until you can lock onto a key word or phrase that you can twist into something that it isn't?

This has made me feel a little more motivated to get a voice recorder, though not for the typical reason. Despite my best efforts to make it obvious that I wasn't arguing about the legality of the mall policy, and that I just wanted to know who to complain to about their policy, it seemed like they weren't perceiving my comments the way I intended. I definitely need to record things like this so I can listen back later to see if I sound more confrontational than I realize.

The intention here is self-critique of ones interpersonal relation skills....apparently in an effort to IMPROVE THE IMAGE ONE PRESENTS TO THE PUBLIC WHEN CONFRONTED. Seems commendable to me.

How is this NOT a 'real reason'?:banghead:
I got some pie to go along with that cake!!! Eat up!!!
 

Thundar

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Messages
4,946
Location
Newport News, Virginia, USA
imported post

VCDL President wrote:
I have recommended for some time that when carrying on private property, except restaurants that serve alcohol, to conceal carry if you have a CHP.

Public property is different.

Private property can ban guns at will and the worst track records with 'no guns' bans are at large malls and movie theaters.

What we don't want is to goad malls and movie theaters into posting, which would affect everyone - even those who concealed carry. Better to let them have their private, unwritten policies and to once in a while ask an open carrier to leave, than to post.

1) A right exercised is a right lost. That is the motto on this forum.

2) The premise that OCing will ruin it fo CCres on private property is a false flag. What legal difference does a sign make to the CCer?A no firearmssign is a private conduct rule, just like a no chewing gum sign and has no legal effect.

3) There is a practical side to what you say, as it is the path of least resistance. The path of the OC activist, however, is often harder.The mirror, however,is easier for theOC activist to stare into when shaving in the morning.
 

hsmith

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2007
Messages
1,687
Location
Virginia USA, ,
imported post

What I have long recommended is (since they are apparently posted no carry sign/policy already) is to write the managers of your favorite stores as well as their district managers and inform them that due to mall policy, you will no longer be spending your money there. That, in this down economy, they must be doing pretty well to turn people away from spending money! Be sure to include the mall management on EVERY letter you send out.

Money talks.
 

richarcm

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
1,182
Location
Richmond, VA
imported post

Thundar wrote:
VCDL President wrote:
I have recommended for some time that when carrying on private property, except restaurants that serve alcohol, to conceal carry if you have a CHP.

Public property is different.

Private property can ban guns at will and the worst track records with 'no guns' bans are at large malls and movie theaters.

What we don't want is to goad malls and movie theaters into posting, which would affect everyone - even those who concealed carry. Better to let them have their private, unwritten policies and to once in a while ask an open carrier to leave, than to post.

1) A right exercised is a right lost. That is the motto on this forum.

2) The premise that OCing will ruin it fo CCres on private property is a false flag. What legal difference does a sign make to the CCer?A no firearmssign is a private conduct rule, just like a no chewing gum sign and has no legal effect.

3) There is a practical side to what you say, as it is the path of least resistance. The path of the OC activist, however, is often harder.The mirror, however,is easier for theOC activist to stare into when shaving in the morning.

Its a right UNexercised.

But I see his point....to an extent at least. It's not good for the image of guns if every store you go into has a no guns allowed decal. If you are a kid and everytime you walk into a store you see the equivelence of the poison label on every store...you may grow up thinking guns are bad and should be banned.

However, at the same time, maybe we should only CC in public as well. The more we OC the more agressive the anti's may become and the more likely that government may see more and more of a need to appease those who are 'offended'.

It's a tight rope to walk. But I tend to see more employees excited about me carrying, interested, asking questions, surprised, etc....those are positive interactions with people who would normally have no clue.

I would be more apt to agree with a middle ground. Continue OCing where it isn't posted that you can not but cool off on the emails and phone calls complaining. Its like calling me complaining because I won't let you wear shoes in my house. I'm still not going to let you wear them. I just might remember next time to warn you before you come in because we talked about it on the phone.
 

VCDL President

Centurion
Joined
Jun 22, 2006
Messages
600
Location
Midlothian, Virginia, USA
imported post

Thundar wrote:
VCDL President wrote:
I have recommended for some time that when carrying on private property, except restaurants that serve alcohol, to conceal carry if you have a CHP.

Public property is different.

Private property can ban guns at will and the worst track records with 'no guns' bans are at large malls and movie theaters.

What we don't want is to goad malls and movie theaters into posting, which would affect everyone - even those who concealed carry. Better to let them have their private, unwritten policies and to once in a while ask an open carrier to leave, than to post.

1) A right exercised is a right lost. That is the motto on this forum.

2) The premise that OCing will ruin it fo CCres on private property is a false flag. What legal difference does a sign make to the CCer?A no firearmssign is a private conduct rule, just like a no chewing gum sign and has no legal effect.

3) There is a practical side to what you say, as it is the path of least resistance. The path of the OC activist, however, is often harder.The mirror, however,is easier for theOC activist to stare into when shaving in the morning.
Let's be clear - on PRIVATE property you don't have a lot of your rights. If someone stepped into your home with a shirt with profanity written on it and you had a ten-year old around, you might decide that person's free speech rights don't exist. Someone who doesn't like you or your guns can ask you to leave their private property with impunity.

Saying that carrying on PRIVATE property is exercising a right, is simply wrong. You don't have a right to bear arms on private property.

Remember - I don't make the laws, I'm just the messenger.

You CAN exercise that right, which you do have, in a public building, on a public sidewalk, or on your own property or on the property of someone who doesn't care or is sympathetic to the right. Just remember that on private property, the owner can decide what rights you have and can exercise and which you don't and can't.

Also, I wish it were a false flag about signs going up. The problem is with some gun owners, who when asked to leave private property based on a policy, written or not, DEMAND that a sign go up with the stated policy. Stupid, stupid, stupid.

If you want to open carry at a mall or theater, go right ahead. If you get kicked out, you most certainly can boycott the stores if you wish. That is one piece of leverage you have to make them reconsider. But your ability to exercise the right to carry ends at the beginning of their property.

I don't consider a store that bans only a certain type of carry (either no open carry or no concealed carry) to be anti-gun as long as they allow one or the other. The problem, and associated campaign to correct the problem, comes when all carry is disallowed. Some malls don't post a policy because they don't carry about CC, but don't want OC. Oh, well.

If the mall has nothing posted, but do have a 'no guns' policy and you are carrying concealed, you don't know about their rule and they don't know about your gun. No harm, no foul, no trespass.

If the law were to be changed where public accommodations (hotels, malls, stores) had to allow all forms of legal carry (which would be cool from my point of view), THEN we could talk about exercising a right on that property.
 

GLENGLOCKER

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2007
Messages
558
Location
VA Beach, Virginia, USA
imported post

Greenbrier Mall is posted. When you enter through the main entrance there's a sign with over 20 rules for the mall posted. Rule number 20 reads "no firearms or dangerous weapons allowed" The sign is on the left wall so you really have to go out of your way to see it. At the end of the rules list there a sentence that reads "if you feel any of the above rules violate your rights please contact mall management" Funny thing about rule 20 is, after you enter the mall there's a knife store called the Baer Edge that has battle axes and swords for sale.
 

VCDL President

Centurion
Joined
Jun 22, 2006
Messages
600
Location
Midlothian, Virginia, USA
imported post

GLENGLOCKER wrote:
Greenbrier Mall is posted. When you enter through the main entrance there's a sign with over 20 rules for the mall posted. Rule number 20 reads "no firearms or dangerous weapons allowed" The sign is on the left wall so you really have to go out of your way to see it. At the end of the rules list there a sentence that reads "if you feel any of the above rules violate your rights please contact mall management" Funny thing about rule 20 is, after you enter the mall there's a knife store called the Baer Edge that has battle axes and swords for sale.
If the rule is that well hidden, they would most probably have to give a verbal notice to anyone they see before a trespass charge could stick.
 

darthmord

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2008
Messages
998
Location
Norfolk, Virginia, USA
imported post

Even better is Lynnhaven Mall.

They don't have their 'rules of themall' sign (which includes the line 'no firearms or dangerous weapons') at all entrances.

I can in fact walk into the mall and exit the mall USING PUBLIC ENTRY / EXIT points without ever seeing a sign that indicates what the rules are.

So is a half-stated policy like this really enforceable from the doorway? I would say no.
 

VCDL President

Centurion
Joined
Jun 22, 2006
Messages
600
Location
Midlothian, Virginia, USA
imported post

darthmord wrote:
Even better is Lynnhaven Mall.

They don't have their 'rules of themall' sign (which includes the line 'no firearms or dangerous weapons') at all entrances.

I can in fact walk into the mall and exit the mall USING PUBLIC ENTRY / EXIT points without ever seeing a sign that indicates what the rules are.

So is a half-stated policy like this really enforceable from the doorway? I would say no.
No - they would have to verbally tell you in that case and could only charge you if you refused to comply.
 

GLENGLOCKER

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2007
Messages
558
Location
VA Beach, Virginia, USA
imported post

VCDL President wrote:
GLENGLOCKER wrote:
Greenbrier Mall is posted. When you enter through the main entrance there's a sign with over 20 rules for the mall posted. Rule number 20 reads "no firearms or dangerous weapons allowed" The sign is on the left wall so you really have to go out of your way to see it. At the end of the rules list there a sentence that reads "if you feel any of the above rules violate your rights please contact mall management" Funny thing about rule 20 is, after you enter the mall there's a knife store called the Baer Edge that has battle axes and swords for sale.
If the rule is that well hidden, they would most probably have to give a verbal notice to anyone they see before a trespass charge could stick.
I never knew it was there until someone told me where to look for it, and the font is about this big on the sign. No Firearms
 

Thundar

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Messages
4,946
Location
Newport News, Virginia, USA
imported post

VCDL President wrote:
GLENGLOCKER wrote:
Greenbrier Mall is posted. When you enter through the main entrance there's a sign with over 20 rules for the mall posted. Rule number 20 reads "no firearms or dangerous weapons allowed" The sign is on the left wall so you really have to go out of your way to see it. At the end of the rules list there a sentence that reads "if you feel any of the above rules violate your rights please contact mall management" Funny thing about rule 20 is, after you enter the mall there's a knife store called the Baer Edge that has battle axes and swords for sale.
If the rule is that well hidden, they would most probably have to give a verbal notice to anyone they see before a trespass charge could stick.
Open or concealed carry on private property is a rule violation, not trespassing.Nowhere in the Virginia Code is there asection that provides for aprivate rule violationbeing a trespass.

Think of it this way: If rule # 47 was no gum chewing, then would a person that was chewing gum be trespassing? No, he was breaking a private rule. The owner can ask him to leave, and if he refuses, then he is trespassing. It is the same for firearms.
 

VCDL President

Centurion
Joined
Jun 22, 2006
Messages
600
Location
Midlothian, Virginia, USA
imported post

Thundar wrote:
VCDL President wrote:
GLENGLOCKER wrote:
Greenbrier Mall is posted. When you enter through the main entrance there's a sign with over 20 rules for the mall posted. Rule number 20 reads "no firearms or dangerous weapons allowed" The sign is on the left wall so you really have to go out of your way to see it. At the end of the rules list there a sentence that reads "if you feel any of the above rules violate your rights please contact mall management" Funny thing about rule 20 is, after you enter the mall there's a knife store called the Baer Edge that has battle axes and swords for sale.
If the rule is that well hidden, they would most probably have to give a verbal notice to anyone they see before a trespass charge could stick.
Open or concealed carry on private property is a rule violation, not trespassing.Nowhere in the Virginia Code is there asection that provides for aprivate rule violationbeing a trespass.

Think of it this way: If rule # 47 was no gum chewing, then would a person that was chewing gum be trespassing? No, he was breaking a private rule. The owner can ask him to leave, and if he refuses, then he is trespassing. It is the same for firearms.
It has been argued that if there is a posting and it is predominant enough, you could be charged. In practice, I don't think that really happens.
 

Darylvb

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2008
Messages
36
Location
, ,
imported post

What if you, conceal carrying,go into a mall with a no firearms policy and while there a bad guy comes in and starts shooting people and you pull your gun and shoot and kill the bad guy. What could they do to you? Alsoyou could be mistaken for the bad guy when the police arrive afterwards.
 
Top