• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

2A Incorporation

WCrawford

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Messages
592
Location
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
imported post

I see the term "2A Incoporation" and I really have no idea what this means. Can anyone explain what the term means in non-legalese. I'm a very intelligent guy, but I don't speak/read foreign languanges. :)



So, what is it and why should I want it? Give me all the gritty details.
 

Slayer of Paper

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
460
Location
Phoenix, Arizona, USA
imported post

I agree, always verify for yourself.

Here it is in a nutshell. The 14th amendment, among other things, denies the States the ability to deny certain rights that are protected by the U.S. constitution. Note that it does not do this for ALL rights in the constitution, just those that the Supreme Court of the US (SCOTUS) has ruled should be "incorporated" into the 14th amendment. For example, the right to be secure against unlawful search and seizure is incorporated, so no state can pass a law that allows for warrant-less searches.

As it pertains to the 2nd amendment, the SCOTUS recently ruled that the 2nd amendment protects an INDIVIDUAL right to keep and bear arms. However, the 2nd amendment only forbids the FEDERAL government from infringing upon the right to keep and bear arms. Until the 2nd is "incorporated" into the 14th, then there is nothing that prevents state governments from infringing upon our right to keep and bear arms (except our votes).

It should also be noted that many states (more than half, IIRC) already have a keep and bear arms clause in their own state constitution. Incorporation would simply be redundant for those states.
 

Doug Huffman

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
9,180
Location
Washington Island, across Death's Door, Wisconsin,
imported post

Slayer of Paper wrote:
I agree, always verify for yourself.

It should also be noted that many states (more than half, IIRC) already have a keep and bear arms clause in their own state constitution. Incorporation would simply be redundant for those states.
Quibble. Wisconsin has Section I Article 25 amended to its constitution in 1997 and gutted by its Supreme Court. Wisconsin will benefit from incorporation of the 2A.
 

Evil Ernie

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
779
Location
Castle Rock, Colorado, USA
imported post

Colorado's Constitutions Article II Section 13 is almost perfect:

Right to bear arms. The right of no person to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person and property, or in aid of the civil power when thereto legally summoned, shall be called in question; but nothing herein contained shall be construed to justify the practice of carrying concealed weapons.

Aside from the last clause about CCW, it's a good one!

In addition to section 13, is Section 2:

Inalienable rights. All persons have certain natural, essential and inalienable rights, among which may be reckoned the right of enjoying and defending their lives and liberties; of acquiring, possessing and protecting property; and of seeking and obtaining their safety and happiness.

I freakin love this state!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Top