imported post
dlofton wrote:
Now, as to how the above paragraph fits into open carrying of firearms. Peace officers are taught from day one at the academy that the person who has the potential to exact the most amount of danger is the person we want to deal with first.This person is the one who has the "proximate capacity" to do the most damage at any one time. A person who has a fireman on their person is the one who our training tells us is the one we should deal with first. To most people on this board this would seem to say that anyone who has a gun displayed openly on their hip, whether or not it is lawfully carried, is target of police. The reality is that this is mostly true. No one left on planet Earth is alive today from the Old West where firearms were only worn without issue. Because of this and the training they receive at the academy, firearms set off some type of alert in our minds as to a perceived danger. I know people view this as unfair when people are openly carrying firearms but it is just a reality that one must face. Most of traditional America is not used to people openly carrying arms. I know this is a hard pill to swallow but it is just true.
By this capacity, what 'threat level' am I for knowing how to build a nuclear weapon?
We have no trouble swallowing this pill. Several people here have experienced it first-hand. It is the prejudice, hate, and ignorange that you've described, which we are attempting to eliminate.
Just because it is incommon, does not make it a bad thing. One who 'bears the capacity' is NOT an actual threat. YOU carry a weapon when on duty. It doesn't make you a threat. The badge or the uniform don't make you into a magically different person, you've described that yourself already.
Having been through the Police Academy myself, I know there really isn't a lot of 'training' with firearms. Most people here have an absolutely HUGE 'advantage' over the people I was in class with, when it comes to demeanor, attitude, and actually hitting what they aim at if/when they need to. The majority of what I experienced at the Academy was just a repeated expresion of hate for the Bill of Rights and an encouragement to be a bully and get away with anything you can. That's why I left, and why I have no interest in being a 'peace officer.'
In an actual crime/tactical situation, you'd be right. But some guy strolling through the mall does not need 'to be dealt with first' because he's not doing anything wrong. In a circumstance where there is no crime, there is no determinable threat either.
I 'bear the capacity' to drive my car through a bunch of kids at a bus stop. That certainly wouldn't be 'normal' behavior either. But you can't tell what I might do just by my possession of a car. My intentions are as concealed as your CCW, even if the tool is not.
The whole point is that the perception of 'danger' by the mere presence of an object is ignorant prejudice. Just because the car is 'normal' does not negate it's deadly possibilities, nor convince one of imminent danger. Why the hate for guns? It's absolutely no different. The more common OC becomes, the less effective the propaganda-deriven prejudice against it will become. Maybe, someday, people will see how ridiculous it really is to act like cars aren't a threat, but a gun is.