I paid for my own court reporter for a case that was heard in a court that did not transcribe the testimony - only recorded the verdict. Had very good reason and the written record by a neutral party made all of the difference in the world with follow-up action. Even with this, there were goofs and misquotes but they were not substantive.Just an FYI....that is not accurate at all. There are things that have been completely changed. Not sure why but seeing how I was there and all....it's not even just my own testimony that has been changed (although it's mainly some of my convo with the judge that has been "altered" or outright butchered) but a few other parts that have been altered or omitted all together. *sigh*
I suspect that the court does not allow digital recording equipment; therefore, any objection is going to end up meaningless unless very substansive and meaningful - perceived loss or bearing on another case.Can you not object to the transcript as it says above the court reporter's signature?
+1The transcript reads to me like some pages are missing. Perhaps they were merely omitted when the transcript was assembled.