• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Lubbock, TX council votes down effort to ban gun carry at council meeting!

Mike

Site Co-Founder
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
8,706
Location
Fairfax County, Virginia, USA
imported post

I wonder how open carry at Texas meetings will go over ? :)

--

http://www.kcbd.com/Global/story.asp?S=9308060&nav=menu69_1_3

11/6/08
Guns Still Allowed at City Hall After Vote To Ban Them



pxl_trans.gif


9308060_BG1.jpg


pxl_trans.gif


9308060_BG2.jpg


pxl_trans.gif


9308060_BG3.jpg


pxl_trans.gif






Guns are still allowed at Lubbock City Hall. This comes after the city council rejected a resolution that would ban concealed weapons at public meetings. Two council members proposed to post a standing sign prohibiting concealed handguns just outside council chambers. The onlyexceptionwould be commissioned peace officers.

The idea to ban guns at public meetingscomes from council members, Floyd Price and Linda DeLeon. DeLeon tells NewsChannel 11she has seen one council member with a gun in these chambers. "Iam very uncomfortable knowing that other than commissioned peace officers, there are guns in our meetings as we speak," DeLeon said. NewsChannel 11 asked,"today there are people with guns?" "Oh yeah," DeLeonadded.We asked if they weresitting on the dais? "Possibly," DeLeon said.

DeLeonargued under the state's penal code councils can ban concealed weapons during public meetings. "It's something very important for us to honor with a sign and I've seen it at other buildings and we need to protect our employees here from those other than commissioned peace officers," DeLeon said.

Floyd Price added, "We get some pretty heated people while we are doing business for the city of Lubbock. SoI don't think this is unnecessary. I think this is a necessary thing we need to look at."

But not all council members agree. Councilman John Leonard says approving a gun ban notice would work against Texas law. "If we were to post these notices and made that requirement and then enforced that through a ticket or other process it would be defensible and would not be enforce," Leonard said.

Councilman Paul Beane followed and argued concealed handguns make the chamber a safer place. "If this passes this chamber will become a far more dangerous place than it is right now,"Beane said.

After Leonard and Beane both publicly spoke out against the ban, NewsChannel 11 asked if they carry concealed guns during council meetings. "Iam not going to comment onwhether I'm a concealed permit holder. That would negate the purpose of being a concealed permit holder," Leonard said.

"No," Beane said. NewsChannel 11 asked, "You don't?"I do not," he replied. "ButI do have a concealed carry permit."

The vote was two to five against the resolution. Price and DeLeon voted in favor.Todd Klein, Paul Beane, John Leonard, Jim Gilbreath and Mayor Tom Martin voted against it.





Tell us what you think...
KCBD.com Message Boards




Sound off on news or current events on our message boards!
 

Cowboy_Rick

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2008
Messages
233
Location
, ,
imported post

Since they are not allowed in "COURT" then why not have a "VALET" stationed near the door to the Chamber to receive the firearms and re-issue them when the person leaves the chamber same as the system that was used in the days of "YESTERYEAR". That way you have your firearm when you enter the building and when you leave the building-just not in the Meeting Chamber. Seems feaseable! Also go with "OPEN CARRY"(STATE WIDE, of course)that way you know who forgot to leave it at the door!!! This could serve multiple situations.
 

SA-TX

Centurion
Joined
Feb 12, 2008
Messages
275
Location
Ellis County, Texas, USA
imported post

No valet and no posting of 30.06 is better. Carry if you want to. I wish all councils were as wise as Lubbock's. Most here in D/FW *DO* post an enforcable 30.06 sign as they are allowed to do under the penal code. Many city hall buildings also contain the municipal court, so many cities purport to ban carry in the whole building on those grounds. Grrr!
 

Mike

Site Co-Founder
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
8,706
Location
Fairfax County, Virginia, USA
imported post

SA-TX wrote:
No valet and no posting of 30.06 is better. Carry if you want to. I wish all councils were as wise as Lubbock's. Most here in D/FW *DO* post an enforcable 30.06 sign as they are allowed to do under the penal code. Many city hall buildings also contain the municipal court, so many cities purport to ban carry in the whole building on those grounds. Grrr!

But do those jurisdictions posting signs have to have an ordinance to back it up?

If so, do they all have ordiances to back it up?
 

ixtow

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2006
Messages
5,038
Location
Suwannee County, FL
imported post

OK, someone has to say it.

How can "thirty aught six' be the identifer of the posting ban statute?

Oh, the irony....

I guess the only way it could be more ironic, is if the town's name were Springfield...
 

KBCraig

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
4,886
Location
Granite State of Mind
imported post

ixtow wrote:
How can "thirty aught six' be the identifer of the posting ban statute?

Oh, the irony....

My next favorite, if only it weren't off by one digit, is the federal law against violating someone's civil rights under color of law: 49 USC 1983.

If only it were 1984...
 

SA-TX

Centurion
Joined
Feb 12, 2008
Messages
275
Location
Ellis County, Texas, USA
imported post

Mike wrote:
But do those jurisdictions posting signs have to have an ordinance to back it up?

If so, do they all have ordiances to back it up?

No. The penal code makes no such requirement that I can find. Originally, meetings of government bodies were off limits by statute. Then, it was changed so that they have to post 30.06 (as well as churches, hospitals, and amusement parks). Finally, the Legislature stripped government bodies of the ability to post 30.06 signs in most cases, but most who have opined on this think that this is a case where they legally can.

In short, they MUST post to legally ban CHL holders but no ordinance or any other action is required of them.
 
Top