opusd2
Regular Member
imported post
http://www.wsaw.com/home/headlines/34147274.html#
Once again, the protectors of society make us wonder how they are supposed to enforce right when they can't prove they know what it is.
Of course not all of the facts are listed in the article, but we do know that the officer is allowed to keep his job and pay until he is proven in the wrong. I just think using all of the measures to stop someone considered a suspect is a bit on the rough side. After all, isn't force to be considered a last resort? And it is not even known whether or not the dead suspect was even carrying a weapon.
No matter what, it just leaves a person wondering what is considered excessive force and why there isn't the whole issue of entrapment anymore (although slightly off topic, still a concern to me).
http://www.wsaw.com/home/headlines/34147274.html#
Once again, the protectors of society make us wonder how they are supposed to enforce right when they can't prove they know what it is.
Of course not all of the facts are listed in the article, but we do know that the officer is allowed to keep his job and pay until he is proven in the wrong. I just think using all of the measures to stop someone considered a suspect is a bit on the rough side. After all, isn't force to be considered a last resort? And it is not even known whether or not the dead suspect was even carrying a weapon.
No matter what, it just leaves a person wondering what is considered excessive force and why there isn't the whole issue of entrapment anymore (although slightly off topic, still a concern to me).