• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Concealing stun gun?

eyesopened

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
731
Location
NOVA, Virginia, USA
imported post

I found this news story:

http://www.insidenova.com/isn/news/crime/article/police_briefs_for_nov._22/25086/

Man charged with concealing stun gun

An Alexandria man was charged with pubic intoxication and possession of a concealed weapon.

Police were called to investigate a fight in the 12400 block of Dillingham Square in Lake Ridge on Nov. 13 around 10:40 p.m., Officer Erika Hernandez, Prince William police spokeswoman said.

William Addison Clark III, 30, of 5800 Quantrell Ave. in Alexandria, was charged after police found a stun gun on him. He was held on a $5,000 bond and has a court date of Dec. 1.

I didn't know that concealing a stun gun was illegal. Anyone have a cite for it? I know of this cite about concealing weapons (http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+18.2-308), but it doesn't mention a stun gun.

I found this cite:

http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+18.2-308.2but that talks about convicted felons. What about citizens that want to carry a stun gun for self protection?
 

John Pierce

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 5, 2006
Messages
1,777
imported post

I do not believe the charge is valid unless he meets the requirements laid out in 18.2-308.2 which would include having a particular juvenile history.

Having said that, if this person does not have counsel or has a public defender, the Commonwealth can graciously offer to "reduce" the charge in exchange for a guilty plea.

There are two lesson here. 1) Stop drinking and doing drugs! and 2) Always hire the best attorney you possibly can.



eyesopened wrote:
I found this news story:

http://www.insidenova.com/isn/news/crime/article/police_briefs_for_nov._22/25086/

Man charged with concealing stun gun

An Alexandria man was charged with pubic intoxication and possession of a concealed weapon.

Police were called to investigate a fight in the 12400 block of Dillingham Square in Lake Ridge on Nov. 13 around 10:40 p.m., Officer Erika Hernandez, Prince William police spokeswoman said.

William Addison Clark III, 30, of 5800 Quantrell Ave. in Alexandria, was charged after police found a stun gun on him. He was held on a $5,000 bond and has a court date of Dec. 1.

I didn't know that concealing a stun gun was illegal. Anyone have a cite for it? I know of this cite about concealing weapons (http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+18.2-308), but it doesn't mention a stun gun.

I found this cite:

http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+18.2-308.2but that talks about convicted felons. What about citizens that want to carry a stun gun for self protection?
 

rod

New member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
6
Location
Crozet, VA, ,
imported post

§ 18.2-308.2. Possession or transportation of firearms, stun weapons, tasers or concealed weapons by convicted felons; penalties…
A. It shall be unlawful for (i) any person who has been convicted of a felony or (ii) any person under the age of 29 who was found guilty as a juvenile 14 years of age or older at the time of the offense of a delinquent act which would be a felony if committed by an adult, whether such conviction or adjudication occurred under the laws of this Commonwealth, or any other state, the District of Columbia, the United States or any territory thereof, to knowingly and intentionally possess or transport any firearm or stun weapon or taser as defined by § 18.2-308.1 or to knowingly and intentionally carry about his person, hidden from common observation, any weapon described in subsection A of § 18.2-308. However, such person may possess in his residence or the curtilage thereof a stun weapon or taser as defined by § 18.2-308.1. Any person who violates this section shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. However, any person who violates this section by knowingly and intentionally possessing or transporting any firearm and who was previously convicted of a violent felony as defined in § 17.1-805 shall not be eligible for probation, and shall be sentenced to a minimum, mandatory term of imprisonment of five years. Any person who violates this section by knowingly and intentionally possessing or transporting any firearm and who was previously convicted of any other felony shall not be eligible for probation, and shall be sentenced to a minimum, mandatory term of imprisonment of two years. The minimum, mandatory terms of imprisonment prescribed for violations of this section shall not be suspended in whole or in part and shall be served consecutively with any other sentence. Any firearm, stun weapon or taser as defined by § 18.2-308.1, or any concealed weapon possessed, transported or carried in violation of this section shall be forfeited to the Commonwealth and disposed of as provided in § 18.2-310.
C. Any person prohibited from possessing, transporting or carrying a firearm, stun weapon or taser under subsection A, may petition the circuit court of the jurisdiction in which he resides for a permit to possess or carry a firearm, stun weapon or taser…



Looks like you can CC a stun gun as long as you don't have any felonies (for the most part).
 

TFred

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
7,750
Location
Most historic town in, Virginia, USA
imported post

So I guess this means that either the charge is bogus, or the guy has a prior felony record.

I'm no lawyer, but isn't each criminal case supposed to be tried without regard to previous crimes? It would seem that if a person is charged with the crime of concealing a stun weapon, it would imply that the jury is aware of prior felony convictions.

And yes, I'm just blabbing... Feel free to tell me where I'm wrong. :D

TFred
 
Top