So called assault weapons ban

ianto94 · Dec 3, 2008

imported post

The city council last night passed the first reading of the long awaited rewrite of its firearms control bill. It contains among other things a ban on so-called assault weapons. It appears the Brady folks essentially wrote this bill. I am attaching a copy for everyone's information. They will vote on final passage later this month I am told.

SIGguy229 · Dec 3, 2008

imported post

Holy carp!...It's the AWB all over again...to include banning the evil .50BMG round, and the idiotic microstamping provision. :banghead:

So who is going to throw a BS flag on this? Do they not yet understand this will NOT prevent anything? "...shall not be infringed."...sounds familiar. I see nothing but infringements on this POS legislation.

45-ACP · Dec 3, 2008

imported post

OK now im blind,and only read 1/3 of that lol.:what:

:banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:they will never learn crooks don't follow the law .

What happens to these people when the hit DC do the have some thing there that kills brain cells of politicians?

suntzu · Dec 3, 2008

imported post

ianto94 wrote:

The city council last night passed the first reading of the long awaited rewrite of its firearms control bill. It contains among other things a ban on so-called assault weapons. It appears the Brady folks essentially wrote this bill. I am attaching a copy for everyone's information. They will vote on final passage later this month I am told.

After reading a portion of that bill I realize yet again how totally INEPT and utterly ignorant and stupid politicians are.

I would absolutely NEVER spend a day in the district of columbia, let alone live there--I would rather live in China than in D.C.

SlackwareRobert · Dec 4, 2008

imported post

Well only one good line in the whole bill....

"private persons may prohibit or restrict the possession of firearms on their
property;"

This says to me I can tell the gun grabbing police they can't touch the gun when it
is on my property, and there is nothing they can do about it, except arrest themseves.

Grapeshot · Dec 6, 2008

imported post

SlackwareRobert wrote:

Well only one good line in the whole bill....

"private persons may prohibit or restrict the possession of firearms on their
property;"

This says to me I can tell the gun grabbing police they can't touch the gun when it
is on my property, and there is nothing they can do about it, except arrest themseves.

Wha????

Yata hey

cccook · Dec 7, 2008

imported post

Grapeshot wrote:

SlackwareRobert wrote:

"private persons may prohibit or restrict the possession of firearms on their
property;"

This says to me I can tell the gun grabbing police they can't touch the gun when it
is on my property, and there is nothing they can do about it, except arrest themseves.

Click to expand...

Wha????

I think SlackwareRobert is suggesting that he may prohibit the police from possessing their firearms on his property. Or maybe, thathe may prohibit police frompossession ofhis firearm on his property.

mlands · Dec 9, 2008

imported post

The DC council and company still believe that banning guns reduces crime. They always have and always will. Hell will freeze over before you see all of the Bill or Rights respected there. Pass an anti gun bill and you saved the world and accomplished something magical. Hey, lets ban war zones too. I avoid socialist occupied DC as much as possible, where the good citizens are denied the right to self defense.

So called assault weapons ban

ianto94

Regular Member

SIGguy229

Regular Member

45-ACP

Regular Member

suntzu

Regular Member

SlackwareRobert

Regular Member

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior

cccook

Founder's Club Member

mlands

Regular Member