• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Wild West Myth - Debunked

Task Force 16

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
2,615
Location
Lobelville, Tennessee, USA
imported post

I just completed a little experiment today.

We've all heard the anti-gunners whine that "There'll be gunfights in the streets again, it will be the old "Wild Wild West all over again", right? Well, Idecided to prove a theory I have on that. I have a US Firearms "Rebel" .45 cal (Long Colt) SA six shooter w/5.5 inch barrel)that is a clone of the old Colt .45 patended back in 1877. For target practice I use the 225-250 grn Cowboy Rounds (CR) since they are cheaper. Now for those of you that don't know, the CR round is loaded with the same amount of powder as was used back in the era of the "old West". They have quite a bit of recoil, far more than what we see in the movies. Recently, I purchased a box of JHP with the intent of using them as a defensive carry round. I expected them to have more power since they were NOT CR's, but I was surprised as to just how much. The dang gun almost twisted out of my hand. :shock:The CR's are hard enough to hang on to, but this was too much. I also tried fanning off a few rounds with the CR's. Bad idea! I got the hide ripped in the heal of my hand by the bottom of the back strap of the handle, not to mention that I didn't get anywhere's close to the sillawette target I was shooting at that was only 15 ft away. :banghead:

I thought to myself........."There ain't no way that anyone could have done what we see in the movies". I can't remember seeing any recoil of the six shooters in the westerns I've seen. Lots of muzzle flash and smoke, but no recoil. AH, they were using blanks. So I set out to test my theory.

First I looked around for blank cartidges to no avail. Then it dawned on me I can make my own, by extracting the bullets from the ammo I had and replacing them with cotton wads. I started with a few of the CR's. Pulled the bullets, lieving the powder and stuffing a wad of cotten into the casing so the powder wouldn't fall out. Went outside for testing.

The discharges sounded like a toy capgun going off with absolutely no recoil, little if any muzzle flash or smoke. Well that surely wouldn't do for the movies, at least not visually. (Sound can be redubbed in editing )

Back to the workbench.

I tried the same test with one of the JHP cartidges, with no noticable difference.

OK, in order to replicate the visual effect (and maybe the sound) I tried increasing the powder load by pulling the projectile from three cardridges and pouring all the powder into one casing and applying the cotton wad.
Results:
LOUD bang close to that of the live ball JHP round.
Lots of muzzle flash - sort of like that chromed monster Dirty Harry carried.
Recoil: OK i wasn't prepared for the loud bang and I jumped, but the best I could tell, the recoil was about like that of shooting a Colt Frontier Scout .22 magnum.

Went back to the work bench and tried redoing a few cartridges with only 2x powder loads.
Results:
Sounded like a .38 going off.
muzzle flash and smoke looked more like the movies (black pwder would make more smoke)
Recoil - Felt like shooting .22LR, maybe a bit less.

Conclusion:
The movies don't match reality at all. (I think we all knew that already, right?) I can fan a .22 SA six shooter and control it well enough to place 5 out of 6 rounds somewhere in a torsue @ 30ft, but I don't believe I could every do it with this .45 I have. And after getting bit once already from such foolishness I'm not going to try, either.

The fact is, most of what we see donein the movies with handguns simply isn't possible, largely due to the recoil. And I doubt that folks were accustom to doing as much target practice as we do today.


Now, what I want to do make a video recording of the demonstration. Anyone in my area with handguns of the "Wild West" erawant to participate? I think such a video demonstration might dispell some of the myths about "shootouts in the streets" of the old "wild West".

BTW, I've noticed that the semi-autos used in movies/TV don't have realistic recoil either. Like.....almost none.
 

AWDstylez

Banned
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
2,785
Location
, Connecticut, USA
imported post

Task Force 16 wrote:
BTW, I've noticed that the semi-autos used in movies/TV don't have realistic recoil either. Like.....almost none.



Have you seen Hitman?



I lol'd at the whole experiement. Interesting, but man you have way too much free time.
 

Task Force 16

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
2,615
Location
Lobelville, Tennessee, USA
imported post

AWDstylez wrote:
Task Force 16 wrote:
BTW, I've noticed that the semi-autos used in movies/TV don't have realistic recoil either. Like.....almost none.



Have you seen Hitman?



I lol'd at the whole experiement. Interesting, but man you have way too much free time.
No, can't say that I have seen "The Hitman".

So, You find my presentation humorous? Thank you, I try. :)
 

AWDstylez

Banned
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
2,785
Location
, Connecticut, USA
imported post

Task Force 16 wrote:
AWDstylez wrote:
Task Force 16 wrote:
BTW, I've noticed that the semi-autos used in movies/TV don't have realistic recoil either. Like.....almost none.



Have you seen Hitman?



I lol'd at the whole experiement. Interesting, but man you have way too much free time.
No, can't say that I have seen "The Hitman".

So, You find my presentation humorous? Thank you, I try. :)




It sucks in youtube quality, but it's one of the best shootout scenes in any movie I've seen. Every shot taken in that movie had realistic recoil.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-xuRg_KMeE


This part is good too... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ey3ETgUO8w
 

PT111

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2007
Messages
2,243
Location
, South Carolina, USA
imported post

I do find it funny that anyone would even suggest or try to prove or disprove the "Old West" shown in the movies. Why not try to see if a car going off a cliff will explode before it hit the ground or even when it hits the ground. How about the building blowing up and the hero escapes just in time only to be thrown 500' by the explosion and the only scratch is covered by a band-aid on his forehead. Better yet the A-Team getting shot at with 5,000 rounds, the car rolling over three times and everyone walks away without a scratch.

I have just about quit watching movies due to the stupidity of the plots behind most of them or the idiotic special effects and social statements. If you are going to make a movie about something either make it real or enertainment, don't try to mix the two. The only movie in quite a while that I really enjoyed was "Men in BlacK". pure entertainment, whereas "Independence Day" sucked. As a child I watched Marshall Dillon draw against the BG every week and the BG always drew first and shot first but never hit Marshall Dillon. :)
 

Hawkflyer

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Messages
3,309
Location
Prince William County, Virginia, USA
imported post

While humorous, I hardly see how this disproves the myth of old west gun fights. The fact is that historians are now fairly universal in the view that gun fights were rather rare, and that they never involved two guys standing in the street facing each other. I suppose that you might be able to show people that real guns react in ways that would actually prevent gun fights from happening the way a lot of folks think they happen, but even that does not disprove the myth of a high number of gunfights in the old west.

Interestingly, according to research done by John Lott and others, when adjusted for population, there are more gunfights in Washington DC in a year now, then there were in ANY old west town in the 1800's.

Regards
 

Gator5713

Lone Star Veteran
Joined
Sep 28, 2008
Messages
591
Location
Aggieland, Texas, USA
imported post

For some help with your experiment and some good ideas on how to make your loads, check out the Single Action Shooters Society (http://www.sassnet.com/). These guys are 'cowboy action shooters' and everything is done with period correct everything!
Otherwise I am with the historians on disproving the 'Wild West Shootouts'... They just didn't happen! Most 'revenge shootings' were shot in the back! Nobody wanted to risk getting shot first! The british were the ones that were stupid enough to 'pace off' and 'duel'...
 

2a4all

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
1,846
Location
Newport News, Virginia, USA
imported post

PT111 wrote:
I do find it funny that anyone would even suggest or try to prove or disprove the "Old West" shown in the movies. Why not try to see if a car going off a cliff will explode before it hit the ground or even when it hits the ground. How about the building blowing up and the hero escapes just in time only to be thrown 500' by the explosion and the only scratch is covered by a band-aid on his forehead. Better yet the A-Team getting shot at with 5,000 rounds, the car rolling over three times and everyone walks away without a scratch.

I have just about quit watching movies due to the stupidity of the plots behind most of them or the idiotic special effects and social statements. If you are going to make a movie about something either make it real or enertainment, don't try to mix the two. The only movie in quite a while that I really enjoyed was "Men in BlacK". pure entertainment, whereas "Independence Day" sucked. As a child I watched Marshall Dillon draw against the BG every week and the BG always drew first and shot first but never hit Marshall Dillon. :)
Deputy US Marshall Dillon should serve as a model for every LEO who wears a badge today. He was tough, fair, compassionate and respected.

Wyatt Earp never sustained a single gunshot wound.
 

Task Force 16

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
2,615
Location
Lobelville, Tennessee, USA
imported post

Hawkflyer wrote:
While humorous, I hardly see how this disproves the myth of old west gun fights. The fact is that historians are now fairly universal in the view that gun fights were rather rare, and that they never involved two guys standing in the street facing each other. I suppose that you might be able to show people that real guns react in ways that would actually prevent gun fights from happening the way a lot of folks think they happen, but even that does not disprove the myth of a high number of gunfights in the old west.

Interestingly, according to research done by John Lott and others, when adjusted for population, there are more gunfights in Washington DC in a year now, then there were in ANY old west town in the 1800's.

Regards

I know that historians have reported that gun fights were rare. I was interested in showing the technical reasons guns fights, as portrayed in movies, could not have occured. Most of the openly carried handguns of that period were in .41, .44, and .45 cal SA. Many still carried ball and cap that take awhile to reload, unless they had extra cylinders preloaded in their pockets.

My idea was to create a visual aid for those sheeple that might still be on the fence, to help them draw the same conclusion that we have, that the old "Wild West" was not about gun fights in the streets.
 

Flintlock

Regular Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
1,224
Location
Alaska, USA
imported post

Task Force 16 wrote:
I thought to myself........."There ain't no way that anyone could have done what we see in the movies". I can't remember seeing any recoil of the six shooters in the westerns I've seen. no recoil, little if any muzzle flash or smoke. Well that surely wouldn't do for the movies, at least not visually. (Sound can be redubbed in editing )


The only movie I have seen with realistic recoil is the movie Tombstone. You notice obvious muzzle flip during the shooting scenes. Collateral may be another one.
 

FogRider

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
1,412
Location
Centennial, Colorado, USA
imported post

Shoot Em Up was a fun movie. If you ignore the near superhuman accuracy of the hero, most of the firearms seemed to obey the laws of physics as we know them. Well ok, perhaps not, but they did come closer to real than anything else.
 

Hawkflyer

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Messages
3,309
Location
Prince William County, Virginia, USA
imported post

Flintlock wrote:
Task Force 16 wrote:
I thought to myself........."There ain't no way that anyone could have done what we see in the movies". I can't remember seeing any recoil of the six shooters in the westerns I've seen. no recoil, little if any muzzle flash or smoke. Well that surely wouldn't do for the movies, at least not visually. (Sound can be redubbed in editing )


The only movie I have seen with realistic recoil is the movie Tombstone. You notice obvious muzzle flip during the shooting scenes. Collateral may be another one.
The .454 Casull in Alien Nation had a fairly accurate recoil.
 

marshaul

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
11,188
Location
Fairfax County, Virginia
imported post

I couldn't stand the smug tone of Shoot 'Em Up. Not to mention that describing the anti-gun propaganda as "in your face" would be a laughable understatement. I gave it a solid "F", which is rare because I consider it a semi-vocational obligation to find redeeming qualities in every film (if indeed any exist).

At any rate, in response to TF16:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9AJzv8gb2A
:p
 

Task Force 16

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
2,615
Location
Lobelville, Tennessee, USA
imported post

marshaul wrote:

I'd like to see him try that with live ball ammo. You do realize that he was using blanks in his demonstration, don't you? And using blanks to shoot balloons is like shooting a sawed off shotgun, with less range.

My point is, that due to lack of recoil, the six shooters are easy to handle when they're loaded with blanks. Put live ball in them and you have a hand full of bear that is tough tohang on to.
 

marshaul

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
11,188
Location
Fairfax County, Virginia
imported post

Yeah, I was the person who made the comment to that effect, seeing as nobody seemed to have mentioned that. I was trying to give you a hard time. ;)

Edit: notice the user name and time of the comment. :p
 

KansasMustang

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2008
Messages
1,005
Location
Herington, Kansas, USA
imported post

I like both the movies "Tombstone" and "Wyatt Earp". Truth is as some of you know 1. There were rarely any gunfights at "High Noon" and most of the weapons that were being used at the time were Civil War leftovers or blackpowder loads. Up until the OK corral gunfight, which of course didn't take place IN the OK corral but a side lot, Wyatt Earp had only killed one man. Afterwards He and the boys did clear out "The Cowboys"
 

Gordie

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2008
Messages
716
Location
, Nevada, USA
imported post

KansasMustang wrote:
Truth is as some of you know 1. There were rarely any gunfights at "High Noon" and most of the weapons that were being used at the time were Civil War leftovers or blackpowder loads.

Wait a minute!:what:

Are you saying that in the old west:

1. that the blood didn't flow in the streets from all of the gunfights, and

2. that there were not just military style arms, but actual military arms in common use by the average person?

That isn't what they say on the tv news.:shock:
 

KansasMustang

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2008
Messages
1,005
Location
Herington, Kansas, USA
imported post

It's the God's honest truth man. It was actually a very polite society. Course there were killings and such, but truth is it had a lower crime rate than Chicago and DC today. And also the truth is, that per capita there are less homicides in Iraq than DC and Chicago right now, maybe we should pull out of those places?
 

AWDstylez

Banned
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
2,785
Location
, Connecticut, USA
imported post

KansasMustang wrote:
Course there were killings and such, but truth is it had a lower crime rate than Chicago and DC today.

Having 1/500,000 of the population might have something to do with that... just a thought.
 
Top