Gordie
Regular Member
imported post
wrightme wrote:
Maybe it is:
Regardless, this law has way too many chances for abuse built into it. As a veteran myself it scares me. If I was suffering from PTSD, I would think twice before going for the help that I needed. This is hardly the situation that is best for any of us.
wrightme wrote:
[/u]rodbender wrote:Ahhh, the ever so wise NRA strikes again. P#$%ks
Thanks, Gordie.
Or not.......
There are differing viewpoints on HR 2640
I found an article that calls in to question the ambiguous views of 2640.
Doug Huffman wrote:So then this isn't an HR 2640 item at all then.....wrightme wrote:No. Renewal was declined.The letter also indicates that the person was turned down for a CWP.
SC Law Enforcement Division has adopted extra-legal requirements, beyond those addressed in the shall-issue law. IIRC, more than five traffic citations will result in non-renewal as a habitual offender, nowhere addressed in the implementing legislation.
Maybe it is:
Notice that it is because of the diagnosis through the VA that is being given as the reason.I was told that because the VA had me listed as not being able to handle my own funds ( which a local doctor disagrees with) and I'm being treated for PTSD that I was on a FBI list.
Regardless, this law has way too many chances for abuse built into it. As a veteran myself it scares me. If I was suffering from PTSD, I would think twice before going for the help that I needed. This is hardly the situation that is best for any of us.