IanB
Regular Member
imported post
Ya know, the Brady clan have always claimed something to the effect of "We don't have issues withlawful gun owners, even the open carry types. Our mission is to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and those ineligible to posses firearms".
But...
Ya know, the Brady clan have always claimed something to the effect of "We don't have issues withlawful gun owners, even the open carry types. Our mission is to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and those ineligible to posses firearms".
But...
So, what have we here? How does this free legalassistance offerfor DeLeo further the Brady goals of keeping firearms out of the hands of criminals? How does defending the criminal revocation of Mrs. Haine's permit further ANY of Brady's stated goals? It doesn't. This is just another example of the gun control crowd saying one thing and meaning another.Last week, the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence offered to defend DeLeo and the county for free.
"This is a case that calls out for common sense and sanity," said Daniel Vice, the center's senior attorney. "It's an incredible risk to bring a loaded semi-automatic weapon to a children's soccer game."