• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Kent Regional Justice Center

jddssc121

Regular Member
Joined
May 21, 2008
Messages
282
Location
, ,
imported post

anybody have experience (good or bad) checking a firearm @ the King County RJC in Kent ?
 

911Boss

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2007
Messages
753
Location
Gone... Nutty as squirrel **** around here
imported post

I imagine it is the same as at King Co Courthouse in Seattle.

Advise Deputy you are carrying, they will escort you to the lockers, fill out a form, check the weapon, escort you back to the metal detector and then you go through it.

Shouldn't be any problem, just give yourself a little extra time.
 

Phssthpok

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
1,026
Location
, ,
imported post

911Boss wrote:
I imagine it is the same as at King Co Courthouse in Seattle.

Advise Deputy you are carrying, they will escort you to the lockers, fill out a form, check the weapon, escort you back to the metal detector and then you go through it.

Shouldn't be any problem, just give yourself a little extra time.

Have you personally done this?

If so, did they required you to provide ID in order to check/retrieve your sidearm?
 

911Boss

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2007
Messages
753
Location
Gone... Nutty as squirrel **** around here
imported post

Phssthpok wrote:
911Boss wrote:
I imagine it is the same as at King Co Courthouse in Seattle.

Advise Deputy you are carrying, they will escort you to the lockers, fill out a form, check the weapon, escort you back to the metal detector and then you go through it.

Shouldn't be any problem, just give yourself a little extra time.

Have you personally done this?

If so, did they required you to provide ID in order to check/retrieve your sidearm?
Used to do it every day when I worked in the County Courthouse in downtown Seattle. The RJC is essentially a satellite of the Courthouse, KCSO does security at both.

I would expect ID is required, it's been a few years so I can't say for sure.
 

knight_308

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2008
Messages
173
Location
Renton, ,
imported post

I left mine in the car last time I was there, but had to go through the check-in process with my knives. I can't give you any details on how a firearm would be checked, but they seemed to have their act together.
 

jddssc121

Regular Member
Joined
May 21, 2008
Messages
282
Location
, ,
imported post

I did it yesterday and today. Very easy and everyone was very professional. It was a non-issue
 

Tawnos

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2008
Messages
2,542
Location
Washington
imported post

911Boss wrote:
Phssthpok wrote:
911Boss wrote:
I imagine it is the same as at King Co Courthouse in Seattle.

Advise Deputy you are carrying, they will escort you to the lockers, fill out a form, check the weapon, escort you back to the metal detector and then you go through it.

Shouldn't be any problem, just give yourself a little extra time.

Have you personally done this?

If so, did they required you to provide ID in order to check/retrieve your sidearm?
Used to do it every day when I worked in the County Courthouse in downtown Seattle. The RJC is essentially a satellite of the Courthouse, KCSO does security at both.

I would expect ID is required, it's been a few years so I can't say for sure.
That's interesting, because I would consider required proof of ownership more restrictive than state law, and the wording of 9.41.300 makes no mention of requiring identification. It simply states "the local legislative authority shall provide either a stationary locked box sufficient in size for pistols and key to a weapon owner for weapon storage, or shall designate an official to receive weapons for safekeeping, during the owner's visit to restricted areas of the building"
 

joeroket

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
3,339
Location
Everett, Washington, USA
imported post

Tawnos wrote:
911Boss wrote:
Phssthpok wrote:
911Boss wrote:
I imagine it is the same as at King Co Courthouse in Seattle.

Advise Deputy you are carrying, they will escort you to the lockers, fill out a form, check the weapon, escort you back to the metal detector and then you go through it.

Shouldn't be any problem, just give yourself a little extra time.

Have you personally done this?

If so, did they required you to provide ID in order to check/retrieve your sidearm?
Used to do it every day when I worked in the County Courthouse in downtown Seattle. The RJC is essentially a satellite of the Courthouse, KCSO does security at both.

I would expect ID is required, it's been a few years so I can't say for sure.
That's interesting, because I would consider required proof of ownership more restrictive than state law, and the wording of 9.41.300 makes no mention of requiring identification. It simply states "the local legislative authority shall provide either a stationary locked box sufficient in size for pistols and key to a weapon owner for weapon storage, or shall designate an official to receive weapons for safekeeping, during the owner's visit to restricted areas of the building"
I found it kind of interesting that they tried to use the same argument Nickels has used with his gun ban. The guy in the audio tried the "well it isn't a law, it is a rule" garbage which is exactly the thing that these municipalities are trying to state is one reason their bans are lawful.
 
Top