• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

OCing in a restaurant with my weapon side toward the wall

baronfitz

New member
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
4
Location
, ,
imported post

If this has already be covered in detail elsewhere, I apologize in advance...I wasn't sure how to phrase it for the search engine.

I was curious as to whether anybody had any insight on whether one could be charged for a concealed handgun in a place where booze is served if the seat you're in happens to position your weapon on the wall side of a booth. I usually prefer to sit that way to cut down on scrutiny (not that my spare mags and surefire on the other side aren't a giveaway), but after reading some VA case law last night, I started to think that I could get in trouble if my weapon isn't to the outside for God and everybody.

Case law that I read is here -> Modern Law on Keeping and Bearing Arms

Anybody have more experience/insight than I?

Thanks in advance
 

marshaul

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
11,188
Location
Fairfax County, Virginia
imported post

Well, I don't have a cite handy but the general consensus here is that a firearm becoming obstructed from a certain angle of view during normal activities is quite different from actively concealing a firearm.
 

ProShooter

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2008
Messages
4,663
Location
www.ProactiveShooters.com, Richmond, Va., , USA
imported post

marshaul wrote:
Well, I don't have a cite handy but the general consensus here is that a firearm becoming obstructed from a certain angle of view during normal activities is quite different from actively concealing a firearm.
+1 Your seated position does not alter the fact that you are carrying the gun openly.
 

kd4hvz

New member
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
8
Location
Bedford, Virginia, USA
imported post

Reference VA law 18.2-308
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+18.2-308

If you were to walk down the road someone would not be able to see the weapon if they were on the opposite side of you as your weapon. There is no way to ensure it is always viable unless perhaps you were to have it holstered above your head.

So long as it is not "concealed" on you, or "of such deceptive appearance as to disguise the weapon's true nature" then you are fine.

-Michael
 

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
imported post

kd4hvz wrote:
Reference VA law 18.2-308
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+18.2-308

If you were to walk down the road someone would not be able to see the weapon if they were on the opposite side of you as your weapon. There is no way to ensure it is always viable unless perhaps you were to have it holstered above your head.

So long as it is not "concealed" on you, or "of such deceptive appearance as to disguise the weapon's true nature" then you are fine.

-Michael
(emphasis mine)


Welcome to OCDO!!!!!

I hate to "correct" a new guy; but this is really important.

The statute, 18.2-308--linked in the quote, does not discuss '"concealed" on you'. Here is theapplicable text:

A. If any person carries about his person... (emphasis mine)

This does not change the above discussion about "can't always be visible from every angle" and so forth.

Separately, I would like to chip in that how the police officer interprets the statute will be the most important element during a police encounter, especially if he is someone who doesn't like guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens or strongly disagrees with OC.
 

Marco

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2007
Messages
3,905
Location
Greene County
imported post

:
firearm becoming obstructed from a certain angle of view during normal activities is quite different from actively concealing a firearm.
+1 Your seated position does not alter the fact that you are carrying the gun openly.

Agreed!!


Think of it this way.
If you take kittens and place them in a oven do they now become biscuits???
No, their still kittens.

No animals were harmed to prove this point.
 

Pa. Patriot

State Researcher
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
1,441
Location
Just a "wannabe" in Mtn. Top, Pennsylvania, USA
imported post

Is it concealed because people in the next town can not see it?

Ans: No. You do not have to walk around with your hip perched up in the air and a sign pointing to your sidearm.

OC is not an announcement. OC means you are not concealing the firearm, with clothing, hand bag, etc. IE: You are not "hiding" it. Someones ability to see your un-hidden firearm is irrelevant.
 

AbNo

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,805
Location
Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
imported post

If someone were sitting between you and the wall (maybe one of those ugly-skinny girls from Hollywood?), they would be able to see if just fine.
 

Sheriff

Regular Member
Joined
May 19, 2008
Messages
1,968
Location
Virginia, USA
imported post

Citizen wrote:
I would like to chip in that how the police officer interprets the statute will be the most important element during a police encounter, especially if he is someone who doesn't like guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens or strongly disagrees with OC.

Well, this of course dependson what you classify as a police encounter when dealing with a "guns-are-for-cops-only" type law enforcement officer. If a police encounter includes the trip to the magistrate's office, I think the magistrate's interpretation of the law is the only one that counts. I have personally stood in our local magistrate's office on more than one occasion and watched ascops were refusedarrest warrants.

This leaves the cop and his agency wide open, but that isn't the magistrate's problem. :lol:
 

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
imported post

Sheriff wrote:
Citizen wrote:
I would like to chip in that how the police officer interprets the statute will be the most important element during a police encounter, especially if he is someone who doesn't like guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens or strongly disagrees with OC.
SNIP If a police encounter includes the trip to the magistrate's office, I think the magistrate's interpretation of the law is the only one that counts. I have personally stood in our local magistrate's office on more than one occasion and watched ascops were refusedarrest warrants.

This leaves the cop and his agency wide open, but that isn't the magistrate's problem.

Well, yes. If one doesn't mind the trip to the magistrate's.

But, its good to be reminded of the next step in the sequence.

However, are not LEOs in VA required to issue a summons for misdemeanors unless one of several exceptions applies--can't stop the offense, refuses to stop the offense, LEO thinks misdemeanant won't appear, etc?
 

Sheriff

Regular Member
Joined
May 19, 2008
Messages
1,968
Location
Virginia, USA
imported post

If a cop is falsely arresting me, I'm not signing anything andI am going to the magistrate's office. If I am 100% sure I am being falsely arrested, I feel sure the magistrate will think so too and cut me free. Then the real fun begins.
 

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
imported post

Sheriff wrote:
If a cop is falsely arresting me, I'm not signing anything andI am going to the magistrate's office. If I am 100% sure I am being falsely arrested, I feel sure the magistrate will think so too and cut me free. Then the real fun begins.

I appreciate your fire for thuggish LEOs.

Can we focus on realitiesand likelihoods for a bit? I'd like to weigh things out and see how it would affect tactics.
 

Sheriff

Regular Member
Joined
May 19, 2008
Messages
1,968
Location
Virginia, USA
imported post

Citizen wrote:
Can we focus on realitiesand likelihoods for a bit? I'd like to weigh things out and see how it would affect tactics.
Realities and likelihoods? Thread after thread here on the Open Carry forums prove that the reality is people are constantly being falsely arrested for firearms violations all over the nation. The likelihood remains very high that it will continue. I was discussing tactics.... if I am pumping gas into my vehicle and a cop stops and falsely arrests me for openly carrying a firearm in Virginia, I will refuse to sign any summons and let the magistrate explain the legality of open carry in Virginiato the arresting officer. Once the magistrate refuses to issue a criminal warrant and sets me free...... the cop, his superviser and his agencywill be sued. If other officers had stopped and participated in the false arrest at the gas station, they will also be named in the lawsuits.
 

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
imported post

Sheriff wrote:
Citizen wrote:
Can we focus on realitiesand likelihoods for a bit? I'd like to weigh things out and see how it would affect tactics.
Realities and likelihoods? Thread after thread here on the Open Carry forums prove that the reality is people are constantly being falsely arrested for firearms violations all over the nation. The likelihood remains very high that it will continue. I was discussing tactics.... if I am pumping gas into my vehicle and a cop stops and falsely arrests me for openly carrying a firearm in Virginia, I will refuse to sign any summons and let the magistrate explain the legality of open carry in Virginiato the arresting officer. Once the magistrate refuses to issue a criminal warrant and sets me free...... the cop, his superviser and his agencywill be sued. If other officers had stopped and participated in the false arrest at the gas station, they will also be named in the lawsuits.
I'm sorry. I now understand what you meant. Thank you for elaborating.
 
Top