dirtykoala
Regular Member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2009
- Messages
- 644
imported post
edit!
edit!
The idea of having some "third party" videotaping from a distance, is for those cases (rare though they may be)where a LEO might not "appreciate" being taped, and either confiscate the recording equipment as "evidence" which then mysteriously gets erased before it gets to the station. It might seem paranoid, but, if we don't protect ourselves from out of control LEOs, who will.Marshaul, please forgive me for not picking up on got sarcastic tone in your font. (that was sarcastic)
What I'm saying is while I agree that having a video cammera there to prove that leo screwed up, if they do that is, wouldnt be a bad idea, but setting it up with a third party is such a hysterical liberal thing to do. We could keep a cammera with us to document our day of community service and upload the video to YouTube to help educate public, and it could help our defence if leo shows up. But I feel like if we use a third party to "catch the police" and main stream media uses it, most of the ignorant public will see us as a threat, as main stream media generally portrays guns as a threat. I've never heard a news report about a man with a gun, and then nothing happened.
Marshaul, you come of as a liberal that is pro gun, with a stance of "I'm protecting my right and f the big man" take a step back and try looking at your rights from a more conservative point of view.
Ironic, since the only rights 'the right' recognizes are guns and religion. Perhaps you should take a step back and try looking at your rights from a more liberal point of view....take a step back and try looking at your rights from a more conservative point of view.
The acts of few do not mean they represent the many.Maybe I should have said to take a step back and try demonstrating your rights im a more conservative way. Or maybe you have a point, let's do this like liberals do, we can handcuff ourselves together, block traffic, prevent people from getting to work, and yell some chants on a megaphone, that will show the public that all we want is our rights. Let's go all out and have a gun pride parade, we can give eachother hand jobs in public, just like the gay pride parade, we can do it while OCing, the public will then see that we are just normal people doing what our legal rights say we can, maybe that's too extreme, we can just OC and lay in the middle of 101 silently in protest. Wait, let's try a conservative stance, we could just OC over dinner, we could be calm and collective, and wear normal clothes, not yell, not inturupt peoples lives, and maybe people will see that we are just living normal lives, but we carry guns.
I guarantee there are 100 times as many women wearing g-strings at the beach as you will find assless pants in SF. Yet this is acceptable in our culture. Why? Because it's not gay.I'm not against the rights of the gay community, however I think I should have the right to walk down the street and not worry about seeing what goes on at their parades. Drive around San francisco for a while and I promise you will see at least 1 guy walking around with assless pants, and no underwear. I really shouldn't have to be subjected to indecent exposure on streets that my money goes to.
Don't just leave your weapon in your car because you think the police might be edgy. Leave it in your car because open carrying in a government building is illegal. It might be a good idea to brush up on the laws before you accidentally break one of them.Oh yeah and one last thing. Call it cowardly, but when I go to the police station and/or I see a LEO I will keep my holster for my weapon and my magazines, and my loaded magazines on, but I will leave my pistol in my vehicle in a locked container.
171b. (a) Any person who brings or possesses within any state or
local public building or at any meeting required to be open to the
public pursuant to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 54950) of Part
1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of, or Article 9 (commencing with Section
11120) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of, the
Government Code, any of the following is guilty of a public offense
punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one
year, or in the state prison:
(1) Any firearm.
Don't just leave your weapon in your car because you think the police might be edgy. Leave it in your car because open carrying in a government building is illegal. It might be a good idea to brush up on the laws before you accidentally break one of them.
I knew this was coming. And this is why the CA boards here accomplish nothing.but setting it up with a third party is such a hysterical liberal thing to do.
+100dirtykoala wrote:Ironic, since the only rights 'the right' recognizes are guns and religion. Perhaps you should take a step back and try looking at your rights from a more liberal point of view....take a step back and try looking at your rights from a more conservative point of view.
Better still, adapt a libertarian point of view.
I can't remember who the quote should be attributed to, but it goes something like this: "The problem with gun rights is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights."
I found this, it's a start:Anybody have any idea how to draft a petition?