imported post
After doing some reading today and consulting with a constitutional law professor at my university I realized that the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution only applies to the Federal Government and not the states themselves. So my question is why do people often claim they have a right under the 2nd Amendment to keep and bear arms when referring to state and local laws? I do know that the Washington State Constitution does protect our right so would it a not ctually be correct to quote that and not the US Constitution?
After doing some reading today and consulting with a constitutional law professor at my university I realized that the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution only applies to the Federal Government and not the states themselves. So my question is why do people often claim they have a right under the 2nd Amendment to keep and bear arms when referring to state and local laws? I do know that the Washington State Constitution does protect our right so would it a not ctually be correct to quote that and not the US Constitution?