Mike
Site Co-Founder
imported post
Robert Butler wrote:
The cannon of statutoryconstruction to try to give meaning to every word of a statute applies to the text of the statute,not the bill or bills that got it there - I see no problem with removing the currently superfluous CWP exception for vehicle carry - in fact, leaving exceptions in a statue where none need to be there often causes other problems - in this case, looking at the code as a whole post H. 3003, keeping the CWP exemption for vehicles could actually call into question the right of open carriers to open carry in vehicles without any permit.
These are just my constructive thoughts - I agree with your other concerns and conclusions and agree that leaning forward in the saddle on this bill is important.
Robert Butler wrote:
I understand your concerns, and agree with most of the analysis in the link above, but disagree with the conclusion that under H. 3003, "gun owners give up something (i.e., vehicle carry for CWP holders[)]."Unfortunately, H. 3003 is not as clean a bill as one would want it to be. There are some very negative aspects to this bill, which are detailed in the GrassRoots analysis of H. 3003.
Please read the GrassRoots analysis before committing to full support of H. 3003. Unless this bill gets amended to fix the identified problems, it is not deserving of our support.
Rob
*** GrassRoots Legislative Watch ***
H. 3003
This is a Legislative Watch announcement from GrassRoots GunRights of SC.
This email is sent for information purposes only. No immediate action
is required. If immediate action becomes needed on a gun-related bill,
GrassRoots will send out a GrassRoots Action Alert email with
information and instructions on what to do.
15 January 2009
The following gun-related bill has been sponsored in the South
Carolina General Assembly!
Bill H. 3003 sponsored by Representative Cooper (R-Anderson).
A full GrassRoots analysis of the bill can be found at:
http://scfirearms.org/Legislative/H3003.html
Bill Rentiers
Executive Officer
GrassRoots GunRights of SC
The cannon of statutoryconstruction to try to give meaning to every word of a statute applies to the text of the statute,not the bill or bills that got it there - I see no problem with removing the currently superfluous CWP exception for vehicle carry - in fact, leaving exceptions in a statue where none need to be there often causes other problems - in this case, looking at the code as a whole post H. 3003, keeping the CWP exemption for vehicles could actually call into question the right of open carriers to open carry in vehicles without any permit.
These are just my constructive thoughts - I agree with your other concerns and conclusions and agree that leaning forward in the saddle on this bill is important.