Doug Huffman
Banned
imported post
Sheriff wrote:
Sheriff wrote:
But for a useful fool.
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Cop on AR15.com lets you know he is the law!
- Thread starter .40 Cal
- Start date
.40 Cal
State Researcher
imported post
He is. He goes to the forum meetups at the outdoor range not far from Charlotte. Even though some of the guys know him, it doesn't mean they have had to be on the business end of one of his "feelings".
He is. He goes to the forum meetups at the outdoor range not far from Charlotte. Even though some of the guys know him, it doesn't mean they have had to be on the business end of one of his "feelings".
imported post
im not one for f***ing over LEOs since i work very close to them and have only had one negative argument with a cop, but i would be more then happy to get that guy thrown off the force if he ever conducted an unlawful arrest. hopefully karma will swing around and knock him off his high horse.
im not one for f***ing over LEOs since i work very close to them and have only had one negative argument with a cop, but i would be more then happy to get that guy thrown off the force if he ever conducted an unlawful arrest. hopefully karma will swing around and knock him off his high horse.
buster81
Regular Member
imported post
Liko81 wrote:
I'm a big supporter of the 1st ammendment, as long as others don'tsay something stupid.
Liko81 wrote:
The second quote seems to contradict the first one.
I'm a big supporter of the 1st ammendment, as long as others don'tsay something stupid.
sraacke
Regular Member
imported post
buster81 wrote:
buster81 wrote:
Comments like his bring back memories of when pagers and cellphones were first coming on the streets. Some cops saw citizens with pagers and thought that if they didn't look like doctors or lawers then they were probably drug dealers and the pager was enough probable cause to stop and search someone on the street. Now we have replaced pagers with holstered firearms and we have the same mentality to deal with. If we are carrying a gun and don't have a badge displayed then we must be up to no good. Well, that's a load... wait...my pager's going off....let's see...Oh...I have to return this call.....back later.
XD-GEM
Campaign Veteran
imported post
yale wrote:
yale wrote:
Oh, yale, then I am screwed! If you'll recall from our meet-up, I wear a pager, a cellphone AND a pistol.
imported post
Hawkflyer wrote:
funny the first thing we learned at I Take Child Molesters Off The Street Forensics Academy was to spell dependent.
DETECT DETER OBSERVE REPORT
Hawkflyer wrote:
when i approach a civilian... my training kicks in... i become a machine... i don't recognize attitudes... i recognize THE LAW. and the law says don't be suspicious.
funny the first thing we learned at I Take Child Molesters Off The Street Forensics Academy was to spell dependent.
DETECT DETER OBSERVE REPORT
ODA 226
Regular Member
imported post
Sheriff wrote:
Sheriff wrote:
On a Special Forces website that I and a few others here belong to, we DO have a 100% foolproof verification process.
Sheriff
Regular Member
imported post
ODA 226 wrote:
ODA 226 wrote:
So if one of these "others" you speak of let me use their sign in and password, it would still be foolproof?
Citizen
Founder's Club Member
imported post
PaulBlart wrote:
(Buzzer)
'tis unseemly for the satirist to stoop to mere arguing and sarcasm.
Suggested edit:
"The one place we LEOs seem to have trouble is spelling. I admit it. Its a wide-spread failing in the profession. I could only spell dependent correctly because I had to look it up. (It took a little longer than usual because I came across doughnut on the way--notice I spelled that one correctly, to.)"
PaulBlart wrote:
(Buzzer)
'tis unseemly for the satirist to stoop to mere arguing and sarcasm.
Suggested edit:
"The one place we LEOs seem to have trouble is spelling. I admit it. Its a wide-spread failing in the profession. I could only spell dependent correctly because I had to look it up. (It took a little longer than usual because I came across doughnut on the way--notice I spelled that one correctly, to.
)"Doug Huffman
Banned
imported post
Sheriff wrote:
Sheriff wrote:
I'd tell ya but then I'd have to kill ya. Or What, you think a bro would betray a bro?So if one of these "others" you speak of let me use their sign in and password, it would still be foolproof?
deepdiver
Campaign Veteran
imported post
Citizen, you kill me!! :lol:
Citizen, you kill me!! :lol:
marshaul
Campaign Veteran
imported post
Citizen wrote:
Citizen wrote:
Citizen makes a very astute observation and suggestion here, Paul.PaulBlart wrote:
(Buzzer)
'tis unseemly for the satirist to stoop to mere arguing and sarcasm.
Suggested edit:
"The one place we LEOs seem to have trouble is spelling. I admit it. Its a wide-spread failing in the profession. I could only spell dependent correctly because I had to look it up. (It took a little longer than usual because I came across doughnut on the way--notice I spelled that one correctly, to.
imported post
Yes I did have to look it up, in the dictionary... i would use the spell checker we have here at head quarters but it changes every underlined word to "STOP RESISTING, TAZE HIM".
not very practical for me at the moment considering these forums have logs, and another tazer related incident be a disaster. not so much for myself, but LE is so respected it would damage the community to hear it.
Yes I did have to look it up, in the dictionary... i would use the spell checker we have here at head quarters but it changes every underlined word to "STOP RESISTING, TAZE HIM".
not very practical for me at the moment considering these forums have logs, and another tazer related incident be a disaster. not so much for myself, but LE is so respected it would damage the community to hear it.
DocV
Regular Member
imported post
ODA 226 wrote:
ODA 226 wrote:
"What is the combination of the boathouse at Hereford?"
Doug Huffman
Banned
imported post
DocV wrote:
DocV wrote:
Color! Color. Ambushed by a cup of coffee! (In the keyboard?)ODA 226 wrote:"What is the combination of the boathouse at Hereford?"
40s-and-wfan
Regular Member
imported post
I want to know what dictionary displays the word 'doughnut' beforre 'dependent' or were you reading it backwards?(Buzzer)
'tis unseemly for the satirist to stoop to mere arguing and sarcasm.
Suggested edit:
"The one place we LEOs seem to have trouble is spelling. I admit it. Its a wide-spread failing in the profession. I could only spell dependent correctly because I had to look it up. (It took a little longer than usual because I came across doughnut on the way--notice I spelled that one correctly, to.
Doug Huffman
Banned
imported post
Speaking for myself as a heavy and frequent user of dictionaries. Yup, 'backwards' I flip the pages with my left hand and thumb and stop with my more dexterous right hand and fingers.
Speaking for myself as a heavy and frequent user of dictionaries. Yup, 'backwards' I flip the pages with my left hand and thumb and stop with my more dexterous right hand and fingers.