• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

John Lott: 'Well Respected Law Professor Predicts that the Heller Decision will be Overturned'

mkl

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
387
Location
arlington,va, ,
imported post

MI-copperhead wrote:
Interesting conclusion.  Liked the last line.

"Policymakers who continue to, press legislation grounded on supply-side ideal while disclaiming the goal of prohibition are  deluded or pandering."

Does anyone understand why Lott made the subject "Well Respected Law Professor Predicts that the Heller Decision will be Overturned"?
I don't see such a prediction in the attached pdf. Certainly, if it is mentioned that isn't the overall theme of the document.
 

Doug Huffman

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
9,180
Location
Washington Island, across Death's Door, Wisconsin,
imported post

Dr. Lott corresponds comfortably and easily. Ask him.

Scanning for your concern I found this...
Two things are foreseeable. First, supply regulations on the edges of Heller will have only symbolic effect because Heller plainly bars laws intended to cut supply to zero. Second, because Heller formally blocks the supply-side ideal, its trajectory will be the focus of political and constitutional warfare. Underlying this will be the mistaken perception that, with sufficient political shift and Heller nullified, supply controls still might work in America. Understanding the structural barriers to supply controls will help us avoid that mistake.
 

TFred

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
7,750
Location
Most historic town in, Virginia, USA
imported post

I read the entire piece and while I didn't see him specifically state that he thought it would be overturned, a large portion of his premise is that it very well might be overturned at some point in the future, especially if any new Supreme Court justices are appointed by a more liberal President who takes a "living Constitution" view.

I found most of his ideas to already be in line with my thinking, namely that handgun confiscation could never work in the US because there are simply too many of them, and too many people who would not comply.

I found this paragraph (page 37 in the .pdf file) on the timing of registration with respect to Heller and it's potential reversal to be the most interesting thought in the entire article:

The analysis [of registration] is complicated by the constitutional protection of the individual right to bear arms in Heller. For this exercise, we have assumed that Heller is nullified or explained away. But for this discrete point, the timing of that nullification makes a difference. If the individual right were extinguished before the registration attempt, the analysis remains the same. People should defy registration on fear of confiscation. However, if registration is attempted during a temporary period of individual right protection, and then Heller is nullified, things change dramatically. Under that scenario, potentially large numbers of people will comply with registration, trusting that the Constitution bars confiscation. A large segment of no-paper guns might be brought within the system. Confiscation that follows, aided by the registration records gathered under the protection of Heller, should more effectively confront the remainder problem. [The remainder problem being the fact that there are a large number of handguns in the United States for which there is no government paperwork, and therefore would likely not be collected during a national confiscation effort.]
Very interesting article, thanks again for posting it here.

TFred
 

Armed4Life

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
164
Location
Pinal County, AZ, ,
imported post

Very thorough analysis. He seems to assume though that, should a national confiscation effort commence, the remainder owners will comply.
 
Top