• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Did Obama just overturn National Parks Carry?

fryfrye

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
40
Location
Arlington, Virginia, USA
imported post

Link:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090121/pl_nm/us_obama_regulations

Text:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President Barack Obama's new administration ordered all federal agencies and departments on Tuesday to stop any pending regulations until they can be reviewed by incoming staff, halting last-minute Bush orders in their tracks.

"This afternoon, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel signed a memorandum sent to all agencies and departments to stop all pending regulations until a legal and policy review can be conducted by the Obama administration," the White House said in a statement issued just hours after Obama took office.

The review is a tool commonly used by a new administration to delay so-called "midnight regulations" put in place by a former president between the election and Inauguration Day.

Midnight regulations have been heavily used by recent former presidents, including the Democrat Bill Clinton, Republican George H. W. Bush, and most recently, the Republican George W. Bush.

Controversial late rules by the outgoing Bush administration include allowing the carrying of concealed weapons in some national parks and prohibiting medical facilities from receiving federal money for discriminating against doctors and nurses who refuse to assist with abortions or dispense contraceptives based on religious grounds.

Federal law requires a 60-day waiting period before any major regulatory changes become law, so some presidents try to publish new major regulations to ensure they go into effect before the new president's inauguration on January 20.
 

TFred

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
7,750
Location
Most historic town in, Virginia, USA
imported post

That is a horribly written news story. Good grief what has happened to the journalism industry? It leaves out the details about how far along in the process a new rule has to be before this order applies, and it clearly implies that the National Park rule change is one of those under review, even though it has already been implemented, and is therefore not.

Horrible excuse for a news report.

I guess if you don't like a new rule, you can just write a news story saying it is under review and no longer in effect, and many people will just blindly believe you. End result is the same as if it were under review and not in effect!

TFred
 

Dutch Uncle

Campaign Veteran
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
1,715
Location
Virginia, USA
imported post

The new rules went into effect before Jan 20th, so Obama can't change them with an executive order. If the socialists really want to spend the time and political capital on such a quest, it will require new hearings and another period of soliciting opinions from the citizens, etc. I'm not saying it can't be done eventually, but if they try, there will be many thousands of us making the process very difficult for them, and by then, the fact that mayhem didn't occur in National Parks in the interim will further weaken any lame argument they might bring up.

Obama is opposed to CC (in fact, all private ownership of firearms according to John Lott) but does anyone think the entire 20+ year hx of CC could be undone by some radical socialists? I don't think so.
 

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
imported post

TFred wrote:
SNIP I guess if you don't like a new rule, you can just write a news story saying it is under review and no longer in effect, and many people will just blindly believe you. End result is the same as if it were under review and not in effect!

Jus' zactly what I was thinkin'.

But not quite yet, I wouldn't think. Unless somebody is really, really ambitious.
 

fryfrye

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
40
Location
Arlington, Virginia, USA
imported post

Well, you have to admit the way the article is written it would lead one to believe the title of my post. I live in Arlington, now being able to drive on the GW is a big deal...
 

GWRedDragon

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
252
Location
Arlington, Virginia, USA
imported post

fryfrye wrote:
I live in Arlington, now being able to drive on the GW is a big deal...
I agree. Realistically the George Washington Memorial Parkway National Park is the only national park I will be visiting within the foreseeable future.
 

Puddin99

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
394
Location
Scappoose, Oregon, USA
imported post

http://www.politickerco.com/4181/obama-punts-11th-hour-oil-shale-park-gun-rules-salazar

Obama punts 11th-hour oil shale, park gun rules to Salazar
By Wendy Norris, Colorado Independent


View the original


Environmentalists and unarmed national park enthusiasts got a bit of a reprieve Tuesday when the new Obama administration issued a memo halting further progress on a series of controversial midnight regulations pushed through in the waning days of a lame-duck Bush White House.



New West.net has the details on the last-minute rules that would have short-changed states on commercial oil shale royalties, de-listed the gray wolf as an endangered species and allowed loaded guns in national parks, among other measures:

Tuesday’s memo from Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel calls for a withdrawal of any regulation yet to be published, a ban on new regulations and a request that departments wait 60 days to implement any regulations that have been published and reopen public comment periods.

-------------------------------

http://coloradoindependent.com/19894/obama-punts-11th-hour-oil-shale-park-gun-rules-to-salazar



National park visitors hoping for a peaceful stroll through natural wonders sans pistol-packing may not have a friend in Salazar. The proposed rule to roll back a Reagan-era ban on loaded guns in national parks was supported by then-Sen. Salazar before being tapped by Obama to lead the Interior Department.
 

TFred

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
7,750
Location
Most historic town in, Virginia, USA
imported post

Puddin99 wrote:
http://www.politickerco.com/4181/obama-punts-11th-hour-oil-shale-park-gun-rules-salazar

Obama punts 11th-hour oil shale, park gun rules to Salazar
By Wendy Norris, Colorado Independent


View the original


Environmentalists and unarmed national park enthusiasts got a bit of a reprieve Tuesday when the new Obama administration issued a memo halting further progress on a series of controversial midnight regulations pushed through in the waning days of a lame-duck Bush White House.

New West.net has the details on the last-minute rules that would have short-changed states on commercial oil shale royalties, de-listed the gray wolf as an endangered species and allowed loaded guns in national parks, among other measures:

Tuesday’s memo from Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel calls for a withdrawal of any regulation yet to be published, a ban on new regulations and a request that departments wait 60 days to implement any regulations that have been published and reopen public comment periods.

-------------------------------

http://coloradoindependent.com/19894/obama-punts-11th-hour-oil-shale-park-gun-rules-to-salazar

National park visitors hoping for a peaceful stroll through natural wonders sans pistol-packing may not have a friend in Salazar. The proposed rule to roll back a Reagan-era ban on loaded guns in national parks was supported by then-Sen. Salazar before being tapped by Obama to lead the Interior Department.
This article references a NewWest.net article, which I could not find quickly from their main page. But Google popped it out here:

http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/obamas_first_days_bring_change_to_west/C41/L41/

It does state:

Tuesday’s memo from Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel calls for a withdrawal of any regulation yet to be published, a ban on new regulations and a request that departments wait 60 days to implement any regulations that have been published and reopen public comment periods.
The National Park rule has already been implemented. Maybe this refers to those that are in the time period between publication and implementation?

TFred
 

TFred

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
7,750
Location
Most historic town in, Virginia, USA

wylde007

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
3,035
Location
Va Beach, Occupied VA
imported post

Let's see if we can count them out... he's been "president" (small "p") for almost 72 hours and he's committed the following Constitutional infractions:

No certificate of live birth
Flubbed oath of office on first try. Repeated SANS Bible.

And now he wants to take the lead of an UNELECTED person and further infringe upon the 2nd Amendment?

Way to go Mr. Soetoro... if that IS your real name.:monkey
 

GWRedDragon

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
252
Location
Arlington, Virginia, USA
imported post

wylde007 wrote:
Flubbed oath of office on first try. Repeated SANS Bible.

Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

The Constitution says nothing about a Bible. In fact, if you read article 6, it is clear that requiring the use of a Bible is not Constitutional:

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
 

riverrat10k

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
1,472
Location
on a rock in the james river
imported post

Just hope I am reading correctly. Please verify anyone.

The reg. is published and in effect so should not be subject to Rahmbo's request. Correct?

But methinks they are trying to include everything they can.

Will buy even more ammo tonight.

Riverrat
 

Tomahawk

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
5,117
Location
4 hours south of HankT, ,
imported post

wylde007 wrote:
We knew we were going to have a Godless, secular humanist come to power...

Withdrawn.

Still not a legal citizen, and that precludes anything else that the magic mulatto may edict.
Is there really any call for this kind of stuff on OCDO?
 
Top