ixtow
Founder's Club Member
imported post
I'm curious.
Why is it considered brave, patriotic, and courageous to kill an enemy wearing a uniform in a war?
Any group fighting an unjust and oppresive regieme in power, will obviously be killing uniformed and 'offical' agents of that state. It is the nature of the circumstance.
Why is the notion so looked down upon here, to the point of censorship?
It is, after all, how our nation was formed. And justly so. "When in the course of human events..."
Why is it that whenever I talk about the inevitable end to which all goverments press themselves and their subjects, it is immediately deleted and I am slandered and insulted into oblivion for it?
I suppose the Jews shouldn't have fought back in Poland either? God forbid, talk about it on an internet forum, had it existed at the time....
Think long and hard about what you're censoring, and which side of the Constitution and Basic Human Rights you're putting yourself on for doing it.
Death threat against the state/cops/soldiers? Hello? The Second ammendment is all about puting the government on notice, that we the people WILL shoot back when they cross the line.
Too easily do the propagandists jump from 'put on notice' to 'death threat' in spite of the lack of any connection. I've not threatened anyone. Just underscored what is already written in the highest law of the nation, exactly as intended.
I wonder what others think of it? Share with me your agreement or flames....
I'm curious.
Why is it considered brave, patriotic, and courageous to kill an enemy wearing a uniform in a war?
Any group fighting an unjust and oppresive regieme in power, will obviously be killing uniformed and 'offical' agents of that state. It is the nature of the circumstance.
Why is the notion so looked down upon here, to the point of censorship?
It is, after all, how our nation was formed. And justly so. "When in the course of human events..."
Why is it that whenever I talk about the inevitable end to which all goverments press themselves and their subjects, it is immediately deleted and I am slandered and insulted into oblivion for it?
I suppose the Jews shouldn't have fought back in Poland either? God forbid, talk about it on an internet forum, had it existed at the time....
Think long and hard about what you're censoring, and which side of the Constitution and Basic Human Rights you're putting yourself on for doing it.
Death threat against the state/cops/soldiers? Hello? The Second ammendment is all about puting the government on notice, that we the people WILL shoot back when they cross the line.
Too easily do the propagandists jump from 'put on notice' to 'death threat' in spite of the lack of any connection. I've not threatened anyone. Just underscored what is already written in the highest law of the nation, exactly as intended.
I wonder what others think of it? Share with me your agreement or flames....