Neplusultra
Regular Member
imported post
Repeater wrote:
Repeater wrote:
Gee, that would be easy to get around. I bet the promoter would be willing to do so too. All they would have to do is set up a few tables for free available for use by anyone not a licensed dealer and has a gun to sell. The promoter would lose a little money but it sure would be a stick in the eye of the antis. Can't say they're a "vendor" if they haven't paid a fee for a table.SaltH2OHokie wrote:The timing is no accident.http://www.stategunlaws.org/pdf/2009-Advocacy-Day-Flyer.pdf
I'm new to the whole "activist" thing, but would it be productive to try to be there next Monday to oppose their "advocacy day"?
Senate Courts of Justice will decide on Marsh's Gunshow "loophole" bill that same morning.
Senate Courts of Justice Docket
Senate Committee on Courts of Justice
Chairman: Henry L. Marsh III
Clerk: Angi Murphy
Staff: J. French, M. Felch, K. Stokes
Date of Meeting: January 26, 2009
Time and Place: January 26, 2009 9:00 AM, Senate Room A
S.B. 1257
Patron: Marsh
Transfer of firearms; criminal records check; penalties. Adds a definition of "firearms show vendor" and requires that a criminal history record information check be performed on the prospective transferee before the vendor may transfer firearms at a gun show. Under current law, only licensed dealers must obtain such a check. The bill also adds a definition of "promoter" and requires that the promoter of a gun show provide vendors with access to licensed dealers who will conduct the criminal background check.